Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

How does an open setup change the course rating?


Note: This thread is 5290 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Does anyone know roughly how much an open setup makes the course and slope rating go up?  Everyone knows it's tougher, but how tough is it exactly?

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Posted

An interesting question, but probably really hard to answer with a general answer as there aren't many courses that host both a US Open and a regular Tour event.     A couple venues to look at are Pebble Beach and Torrey Pines which host both.

Instead of looking at total score, I tried looking at the final round scoring averages and see how they compare since both the ATT and Farmers tournaments also include different courses which impact the winning scores.     So looking at just the final rounds, at Pebble Beach the 2010 US Open played to 74.9 average on Sunday, while the 2011  ATT played to a 73.2 average, suggesting that the Open setup added about 1.7 strokes for the pros.     It is probably slightly more than that as the ATT was played in unusually dry conditions this year so the fairways and greens were already drier than normal and playing more like Open conditions.

Doing the same for Torrey Pines with the 2008 US Open and the 2011 Farmers yielded a different answer.    The final round of the 2008 US Open at Torrey had a scoring average of 72.9 while the final round of this year's Farmers was 72.8.     I do know that this year they set up the Farmers to be tougher than normal by creating much more narrow fairways than in the past, so that probably contributed to the closeness between the Open and normal Tour event scoring.


Posted


Originally Posted by bunkerputt

Does anyone know roughly how much an open setup makes the course and slope rating go up?  Everyone knows it's tougher, but how tough is it exactly?



I am interested to know and I am sure someone at the USGA could answer. I was estimating that the rating would be in the high 70s with slope in the mid to high 150s.  Again, just a guess based on what I see as some of the regular tour events are rated at 75 with slopes approaching 150.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Note: This thread is 5290 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.