Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5311 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys,

Just wanted to share a quick thought. I am a high handicapper and didn't think I would use blades until I greatly improved my game (my rounds are still peppered with occasional nasty slices, chunks etc.). Till a week ago, I had a set of Burner 1.0s in the bag, but to be honest the fat top line of the clubs has always bothered me a little.

A week ago, I saw a used set of Ben Hogan APEX PC with a #3 shaft irons in a golf store for 50 bucks. Its was a full set, and apparently these forged irons had been made in the mid-80s and at the time were the hottest thing one the market. In fact, an elderly gentleman in the store was telling me about how they were the best clubs he has ever hit. Intrigued, I decided to give them a try on the launch monitor. The first thing I noticed was what a work of art these things were. Beautiful look at address, and just a gorgeous, timeless finish. I pulled out a 8 iron, and to be amazement, striped a shot to 2 feet of the par 3 hole projected on the screen. Mind you, it was the first time I had felt that "buttery" feeling of hitting the sweet spot on a blade. After about 10 swings I was sold and picked up the set. At worst, I figured it would be a cool little nostalgia piece to keep around or even better a good set of practice irons with little forgiveness so I could improve my ballstriking. Long story short, my Burners are now in the closet and I've been playing my best golf in a long time.

For those of you interested in a classic set of clubs that wont run in the $800 range, I strongly suggest looking for a set of forged Ben Hogans (pre-Callaway takeover). I've been snooping around and there are sets available on eBay etc. Even though they have been around for ever, they are far from antiquated and the combination of looks and underrated forgiveness are hard to match, from what I've seen.

Anyway, just thought I would share the experience because I know a bunch of y'all are looking for a new set of sticks for this season.

  • Upvote 1

Driver 10.5 G10 Aldila NV Fairway:  15* Speedline Fast 10 Matrix Ozik

Hybrids 909H 19*,  SQ Machspeed 24*

Irons:  MP-53 5-PW PX5.5

Wedges Tw9 50.08  Rac Black 56.12,  Vokey 60.04

Putter Scotty Cameron Newport 2  Ball: One Tour


Posted


Originally Posted by vikramraju

Hey guys,

Just wanted to share a quick thought. I am a high handicapper and didn't think I would use blades until I greatly improved my game (my rounds are still peppered with occasional nasty slices, chunks etc.). Till a week ago, I had a set of Burner 1.0s in the bag, but to be honest the fat top line of the clubs has always bothered me a little.

A week ago, I saw a used set of Ben Hogan APEX PC with a #3 shaft irons in a golf store for 50 bucks. Its was a full set, and apparently these forged irons had been made in the mid-80s and at the time were the hottest thing one the market. In fact, an elderly gentleman in the store was telling me about how they were the best clubs he has ever hit. Intrigued, I decided to give them a try on the launch monitor. The first thing I noticed was what a work of art these things were. Beautiful look at address, and just a gorgeous, timeless finish. I pulled out a 8 iron, and to be amazement, striped a shot to 2 feet of the par 3 hole projected on the screen. Mind you, it was the first time I had felt that "buttery" feeling of hitting the sweet spot on a blade. After about 10 swings I was sold and picked up the set. At worst, I figured it would be a cool little nostalgia piece to keep around or even better a good set of practice irons with little forgiveness so I could improve my ballstriking. Long story short, my Burners are now in the closet and I've been playing my best golf in a long time.

For those of you interested in a classic set of clubs that wont run in the $800 range, I strongly suggest looking for a set of forged Ben Hogans (pre-Callaway takeover). I've been snooping around and there are sets available on eBay etc. Even though they have been around for ever, they are far from antiquated and the combination of looks and underrated forgiveness are hard to match, from what I've seen.

Anyway, just thought I would share the experience because I know a bunch of y'all are looking for a new set of sticks for this season.


There were definitely some great irons forged in the 80s, but the best Hogan irons (imho) were forged during the Spalding years. And I have 2 sets of PCs so that's not hater talk.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

There is no better feel in golf than puring a shot with a forged blade.  Congratulations on converting!  I've always felt that handicap really has no bearing on if you can play a blade or not, how well you hit irons is the key.

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?


Posted

I picked up a set of Apex Edge Pro's on the suggestion of my instructor.  They were in great condition, and I understand what people say about feeling mishits finally.  My Diablo Edge irons are very forgiving, but a good shot almost feels the same as a bad one.  With the Hogans, I know as soon as I strike the ball if I struck it well.   I'm looking for a set of his older forged blades to try out and keep for historical reasons.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Glad you found a set of great clubs at a good deal.  Keep track of your scores with the new sticks and post back.  There is a ton of helpful technology in modern GI clubs, that wide sole and larger face help account for the fat and otherwise poor strikes.

There seems to be a ton of groupthink surrounding blades on this board with mid-handicappers.  Perhaps the shots feel different, but I know for certain that if my index were above a 5-7 I'd be playing something other than a muscleback.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted



Originally Posted by delav

Glad you found a set of great clubs at a good deal.  Keep track of your scores with the new sticks and post back.  There is a ton of helpful technology in modern GI clubs, that wide sole and larger face help account for the fat and otherwise poor strikes.

There seems to be a ton of groupthink surrounding blades on this board with mid-handicappers.  Perhaps the shots feel different, but I know for certain that if my index were above a 5-7 I'd be playing something other than a muscleback.



I hit about the same with blades or cavity backs, but that's because my MBs and CBs have the same grind. The head is a little shallower on the MBs, so they're not as good if the lie is uncertain (some lies in the rough). I definitely use game improvement wedges (cleveland 588s and forged Hogans), a GI driver (PING G10), and a SGI putter (Odyssey WH #7). When I play a longer wide open course, in goes the 3w and 2-H and out come the 2-iron and 3-H. I pick my spots.

Anyway, I recommend blades as an option, but for most players, defintely not as their every day or travelling set - something a little more reliable makes the day more enjoyable on a strange course.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Note: This thread is 5311 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.