Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4502 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Would love to find out from those of you who own an Ogio with 14 way divider how you use it?

Looks like this:

7b1df055_photo.jpeg

There seems to be no putter well along the side of the bag and the center top divider opening is only a fraction bigger than the others; certainly not enough for a mallet putter or any putter head to fit comfortably. Whatever combination of setup I have tried the clubs still clatter into each other. The other slots seem to be pretty much all the same size.

So how do you do it?

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

From this angle you can see the center slots are slightly raised:

ogio-assassin-mens-cart-bag_639715_500.jpg

Here are a few layout ideas I'm toying with. If I can't figure out something simple and workable I'll be taking the bag back. Suddenly loving the simplicity of my current Woode divider on the Ogio Vaporlite.

Grouped:

Assassin-Grouped.jpg

Spiral:

Assassin-Spiral.jpg

Circle with longest in the middle:

Assassin-LongestInMiddle.jpg

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

I don't have one of these, but I've been thinking of getting one, so I'm curious to hear what others will say.

Personally, I like your "grouped" option best.

Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

Grouped:



Posted

I don't like the bag.  It seems to force you to place your graphite shafted clubs in the middle of your irons.  Now your irons are likely to rub or bang against the shafts unless the head covers fully protect the shaft as well as the heads of your driver, hybrids, and woods.  I think the Woode system is probably better even though it doesn't have individual dividers.

I have experience with Ogio.  I have an Ogio Syncro 15 slot cart bag....2009 model I think.  I love the overall look and zipperless ball pocket. However, I have really come to dislike the narrow club slots that constantly snag clubs as I pull or place them.  I have jumbo grips which makes this worse.  On top of that, the individual slot dividers don't completely keep the clubs from snagging on each other either.  On top of that, the external putter well is strategically positioned to force my mallet putter head against the shaft of the nearest hybrid.  So I have to pull the nearest hybrid and put in in the putter slot and leave the slot next to the external putter well open while I'm golfing.

My next cart bag is going to be the biggest I can find with spacious slots and an external putter well that safely separates the putter from my clubs.  And the slots need to be laid out as if it they were designed by a golfer and not interns in the Marketing department looking for something "different and pretty."

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane iMix 11.5*
Fairway: Cobra Baffler Rail F 3W & 7W
Irons:  Wilson Ci
Wedges:  Acer XB (52* & 56*)
Putter:  Cleveland Classic #10 with Winn Jumbo Pistol Grip


Posted


There aren't too many bags on the market for a traditional setup (1w, 3w, 5w, 3-PW, S, L, P) and now that putters need a special slot because of awkward head shapes and delicate finishes, well, I think you're probably onto something with that large cart bag idea.

Originally Posted by Topper

I don't like the bag.  It seems to force you to place your graphite shafted clubs in the middle of your irons.  Now your irons are likely to rub or bang against the shafts unless the head covers fully protect the shaft as well as the heads of your driver, hybrids, and woods.  I think the Woode system is probably better even though it doesn't have individual dividers.

I have experience with Ogio.  I have an Ogio Syncro 15 slot cart bag....2009 model I think.  I love the overall look and zipperless ball pocket. However, I have really come to dislike the narrow club slots that constantly snag clubs as I pull or place them.  I have jumbo grips which makes this worse.  On top of that, the individual slot dividers don't completely keep the clubs from snagging on each other either.  On top of that, the external putter well is strategically positioned to force my mallet putter head against the shaft of the nearest hybrid.  So I have to pull the nearest hybrid and put in in the putter slot and leave the slot next to the external putter well open while I'm golfing.

My next cart bag is going to be the biggest I can find with spacious slots and an external putter well that safely separates the putter from my clubs.  And the slots need to be laid out as if it they were designed by a golfer and not interns in the Marketing department looking for something "different and pretty."



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

I think(!) I've found an excellent solution which doesn't appear to be all that intuitive until the clubs are in the bag:

Assassin-AcrossCenter.jpg

When loaded with my clubs it looks like this:

Assassin-Loaded.jpg

I'm happy with that solution. It's not quite as neat as the Woode system but it's definitely good enough!

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

In your setup above, does the putter face the back of the cart or the front?

I'd love an update after you've used it in a riding cart.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts


Posted

I don't use a cart for golf, however based on the one time I did, the bottom of the bag would sit toward the back of the cart seat to enable access to pockets, ball silo etc. If that's the case the putter would be the first accessible club, followed by the wall of woods and then irons and finally wedges. The back of the cart seat would be at the bottom of the above photo.

On a trolley, the setup above would have the trolley underneath the wedges and the putter uppermost. Possibly a better trolley setup than cart setup.

I also received an incorrect and not fantastically useful reply from Ogio:



Quote:
Thank you for contact Ogio.  As with any top you can arrange your clubs to our liking but the suggest way would be the woods on one side and the irons on the other.

Sides? What sides?

One other strange thing on the bag is that the loading handle is underneath it, not on top. Probably a good reason for it but it's worth mentioning as it means having to use the carry strap to unload/load in and out of the car and (for me!) renders the loading handle useless. If I used the loading handle, all my clubs would spin around and clatter into each other, to then be spin back around and clatter into each other again when put on the trolley. May be different for cart users.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted

Looks good but I would swap the 9 and PW over and it will be perfect

:tmade: M2 10.5° - Fujikura Pro 60 - Stiff
:tmade: V-Steel 18° - M.A.S Ultralight- Stiff
:ping: G400 4-UW - AWT 2.0 - Stiff
:tmade: Tour Preferred 58° ATV - KBS Tour-V - Wedge
:scotty_cameron: Select SquareBack - 34" - SuperStroke MS 2.0


Posted


Originally Posted by Ash1974

Looks good but I would swap the 9 and PW over and it will be perfect



I thought the same thing when I looked at the diagram but looking at the picture with the clubs actually in the bag I like the way he did it better.  With his way, the PW sits further to the outside of the bag that the 9... so going straight across, he has 4 5 6 7 8 9 PW and they are just zig-zagged a bit.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

I don't use a cart for golf, however based on the one time I did, the bottom of the bag would sit toward the back of the cart seat to enable access to pockets, ball silo etc. If that's the case the putter would be the first accessible club, followed by the wall of woods and then irons and finally wedges. The back of the cart seat would be at the bottom of the above photo.

On a trolley, the setup above would have the trolley underneath the wedges and the putter uppermost. Possibly a better trolley setup than cart setup.

I also received an incorrect and not fantastically useful reply from Ogio:

Sides? What sides?

One other strange thing on the bag is that the loading handle is underneath it, not on top. Probably a good reason for it but it's worth mentioning as it means having to use the carry strap to unload/load in and out of the car and (for me!) renders the loading handle useless. If I used the loading handle, all my clubs would spin around and clatter into each other, to then be spin back around and clatter into each other again when put on the trolley. May be different for cart users.


I suppose if you were to ride in a cart you could switch the wedges and the woods to make everything more accessible.... although I like the way that you have it now.

As far as Ogio's response to you, that kind of sucks... obviously you can put the clubs wherever you want but it'd be nice to know how they intended it to be done.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I actually would have reversed the woods and the wedges.  That way my tallest clubs would be in the back and I could access the shorter clubs without them being in the way.

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."


Posted


Originally Posted by Paradox

I actually would have reversed the woods and the wedges.  That way my tallest clubs would be in the back and I could access the shorter clubs without them being in the way.


Yup, for a cart that makes perfect sense and I'd do the same definitely.

For a trolley though if the woods and wedges were reversed and the woods were put at the bottom, all the clubs would hang down and bang into their graphite shafts so longest need to stay on top.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Posted


That proves my point along with the fact we're still debating how to most effectively use their bag design. They didn't have anything in mind.  Interns in the Marketing department designed the club slots so that they were "different and pretty" from previous Ogio offerings.   Golfing has nothing to do with it.

Originally Posted by tristanhilton85

As far as Ogio's response to you, that kind of sucks... obviously you can put the clubs wherever you want but it'd be nice to know how they intended it to be done.



Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane iMix 11.5*
Fairway: Cobra Baffler Rail F 3W & 7W
Irons:  Wilson Ci
Wedges:  Acer XB (52* & 56*)
Putter:  Cleveland Classic #10 with Winn Jumbo Pistol Grip


Posted


Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

Yup, for a cart that makes perfect sense and I'd do the same definitely.

For a trolley though if the woods and wedges were reversed and the woods were put at the bottom, all the clubs would hang down and bang into their graphite shafts so longest need to stay on top.



when using a push cart don't you put the headcovers on after each use?

My philosophy on golf "We're not doing rocket science, here."


Posted


Originally Posted by Paradox

when using a push cart don't you put the headcovers on after each use?


Yeah I definitely do but I wouldn't take a chance on the head cover not being perfectly along the shaft. What happens if I don't notice that the cover sleeve has bunched up going into the cart or while walking it somehow rides up?

On a push cart the clubs are at 45 degrees or so on the cart anyway so as you're walking you have the view as shown in the photo above. It's very easy to stop the cart and grab any club needed in the layout I use as the longer clubs don't get in the way at 45 degrees. I'd imagine they would do when using the bag upright in a drivable cart though.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


  • 6 months later...
Posted

I actually ordered an Ozone XX because of the Woode, but they ended up sending me a Grom XX by accident... I think I may just keep it and have been looking for tips on organizing the 14-way divider.  What do you think of this setup?  We'll call it the snake.

Grom XX.JPG


Posted

Looks good actually; I like the fact that all the irons are accessible without having to rotate the wood covers out of the way to see which iron you're taking (and which hole is empty to put the cluib back after a shot).

See how you get on with it on the course and let us know; I'm up for a bit of trial and error in the search for the perfect bag. :)

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


Note: This thread is 4502 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.