Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5190 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Am looking at buying the Bushnell Tour V2. I really like the compact size but have noticed many comments about the short battery life with the rather expensive CR2 3 volt lithium batteries. If one uses it say 30 times per round, how many rounds will it be before replacing a battery? I golf approximately 50 times a year, so I don't want to be spending $150/year on batteries (approximately $15 a pop)!

I'm also looking at the Bushnell Pro1600 - uses 9 volt batteries (much cheaper, but do they last any longer?) but is twice as heavy, larger and $100 more. Are there other brands I should consider - Callaway, Leupold? Thanks for any help you can offer.


Posted

i have the V2 and i think i would use it about 40-50 times per round measuring mine and playingpartners shots. i have not really timed how long it lasts but it feels like i change about every 10-15 rounds. I buy panasonic CR2 batteries for about $5 here in Malaysia.

I seen a few sales where they sell bulk, like 50+ batteries for about $2 each.


Posted

My battery finally died 2 weeks ago - It was installed in the spring of 2010.  This was only the second battery I've ever had in it, and I bought in in the spring of 2009.  Maybe if you use the thing 5 times a week on the range, then play twice a week, it will go out faster, but I find that the batteries last a very long time when I just used it for on course measuring.  I play 50-100 rounds a year, but I didn't use it for every shot either, only when I actually needed it.

I admit that it didn't get used as much this year since I bought my Garmin Approach G5 GPS.  The Garmin does everything that the laser did, and more.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have a Leupold GX1 and love it. It's compact, light and durable. They do have other models if you're interested. I stuck with the basic one because all I need is distance to the pin and also scanning yardages for different spots on the golf course.. Other models have a nicer OLED display and features such as slope compensation and club selector. But since it's not tournament legal, I would just practice on gauging slope, wind, and club selection on your own.

Best Regards,
Ryan

In the :ogio: bag:
:nike: VR-S Covert Tour Driver 10.5 :nike: VR-S Covert Tour 3W :titleist: 712U 21*
:nike: VR Pro Blades 4-PW :vokey: Vokeys 52*, 56* & 60* :scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2
:leupold:
:true_linkswear: 


Posted

Thanks for all the comments. It seems that battery life with the V2 varies but many users don't seem to have an issue with it. I called Bushnell and was told the V2 was meant more for an infrequent golfer - someone golfing 3 times per week should get the 1600 although I wonder if this was more of an an attempt to upsell me to the next model.  The V2 certainly gets overall rave reviews from most.  But so does the 1600, although it seemed heavy and awkward in comparison. One comment I read said that the V2 was easier to get a reading because the 5x magnification didn't accentuate the shaking as much as the 1600's 7x mag. Could be true? How important is the magnification rate?

The Leupold GX-1 seems very similar/identical to the V2 in size, features and price - although it does have greater magnification at 6x. Same battery too - I wonder if battery life is similar to the V2. Two factors, however, make me lean toward the Bushnell - a 2 year warranty over Leupold's 1 year and there doesn't seem to be any local retailers in my region (Eastern Ontario) that carry Leupold's golf line.

I suspect I'm being far too anal on this but $300+ seems pricey to me when I can't seem to bring myself to spend more than $150 on a new driver!


Posted

Agree that there's not too many dealers out there that carry Leupold. I actually had to order mine online through Golfsmith. Unfortunately, I can't say too much about battery life because I haven't been out there to play many rounds in the last year due to injury and a new addition to the family. And yes, $300 is a lot and I had a similar decision only the decision being between a SkyCaddie (or other GPS device) and a rangefinder. Obviously, you can see what I chose.

Good luck with your decision!

Best Regards,
Ryan

In the :ogio: bag:
:nike: VR-S Covert Tour Driver 10.5 :nike: VR-S Covert Tour 3W :titleist: 712U 21*
:nike: VR Pro Blades 4-PW :vokey: Vokeys 52*, 56* & 60* :scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2
:leupold:
:true_linkswear: 


Posted

I also considered the laser range finders but settled on a GPS device.  It gives you a lot more information and you don't have to worry if you "aimed" it correctly.  But it is a trade off as the laser is more accurate (if you can aim it) and there is no annual fee with a laser.  However I think the GPS is more convenient and is accurate enough.  But admit it is a Ford/Chevy argument and either will work OK.

Butch


Posted


I used my V2 almost every round when I first got it (spring of 2010) and replaced the battery exactly 1 time.  This year I've played most of my rounds at the same course and I don't need a rangefinder (or GPS) since I mapped out a few key distances (e.g. pine tree on the right side to the back lip of the front pot bunker) and I can pace from there. When I play a differerent course it's nice to have. I've used the cart GPS a few times and always preferred the rangefinder. I like to see the distance to the object (flag, hill, tree, person standing on the green, people in the fairway landing area so I know if we can hit yet, etc) and get a number. The cartoony hole renderings GPS provides don't do much for me to be honest, but to each their own. This thread is not that debate (hopefully).

Originally Posted by Trapper0925

Am looking at buying the Bushnell Tour V2. I really like the compact size but have noticed many comments about the short battery life with the rather expensive CR2 3 volt lithium batteries. If one uses it say 30 times per round, how many rounds will it be before replacing a battery? I golf approximately 50 times a year, so I don't want to be spending $150/year on batteries (approximately $15 a pop)!

I'm also looking at the Bushnell Pro1600 - uses 9 volt batteries (much cheaper, but do they last any longer?) but is twice as heavy, larger and $100 more. Are there other brands I should consider - Callaway, Leupold? Thanks for any help you can offer.



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Note: This thread is 5190 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.