Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5206 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been having a lot of trouble being consistent with my driver and could use some swing tips.  Below is a video of me hitting a few at the range, but I have on idea if it is a fundamentally sound golf swing or not.  I'm getting about 280+ yards of carry on the three drives in the video, but I can't seem to consistently put it together on the course.  I've never had a formal lesson so I'm not sure if my footing, stance or anything about my swing is correct.

Any advice you could offer would be greatly appreciated.  I'd be really pleased if I could find a way to replicate the three swings in the video on a daily basis.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rebelxs/6234511754/


Posted

Where is your aiming point in that video?  At first glance, it looks like you're setting up fairly closed, which probably leads to a fairly consistent draw and or hooks/duck hooks.  Is that right?

Carlos


Posted

Hi.  I'm very closed, but that is all I can do to eliminate the draw and hooks/duck hooks.  The balls I hit were all straight as an arrow.  If I open up my stance I hit short balls that have a tendency to hook.

As for my aiming point...... I don't really have one, which has created a lot of problems for me.  I was basically aiming for somewhere between the two hills in the foreground.


Posted


Originally Posted by Mr Putz

Hi.  I'm very closed, but that is all I can do to eliminate the draw and hooks/duck hooks.  The balls I hit were all straight as an arrow.  If I open up my stance I hit short balls that have a tendency to hook.

As for my aiming point...... I don't really have one, which has created a lot of problems for me.  I was basically aiming for somewhere between the two hills in the foreground.



I was going to ask, "You're missing left a lot aren't you."

Stance fixes are backwards.  Aim left to hit it right and right to hit it left.  Without a massive swing overhaul, Get your arms higher in the air on the backswing and aim your feet more left if you want to start hitting it straighter.  Check it out:

top.jpg

Yellow line is the shoulder plane.  Note that your upper left arm wants to stay on the shoulder plane.  Keep that in mind for a moment.  The screenshot gives the illusion that your arms are much higher above that plane because you let your left arm break at the elbow.  The clubhead is pretty much pointing 10 feet past the ball or so, and that doesn't lie.  Note Jamie's clubhead is pointing a foot or so past the ball.  This allows his arms to drop a lot without the fear of hooking the ball due to his strong grip:

JamieSadlowskiBackswing.jpg

With the arms higher, they can drop some onto the right downswing plane.  It will probably feel like you are coming over the top a lot, but it should work to eliminate this unnatural fighting of the release of the clubhead:

winging.jpg

This is obviously holding it off so it doesn't go left.  That's pretty much it.

One question I would ask, If your natural tendency (I believe everyone's natural tendency), is to match your arm plane and shoulder plane, why not just make a steeper shoulder turn, get the left shoulder pointing down at the ball, and the arms will get higher in the air as a result?  Just putting a bug in your brain...

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Posted

bunkerputt

I really appreciate the breakdown and the graphics that you provided.  I played baseball for the first 22 years of my life before taking up golf, so my natural tendencies are to resort to what my body knows.  I'm not stretching nearly as much as I should be, and this is the reason I can't, not won't, keep my left arm straight.

I've tinkered so much with my stance and closing my shoulder that I'm completely twisted around.


Posted


Originally Posted by Mr Putz

bunkerputt

I really appreciate the breakdown and the graphics that you provided.  I played baseball for the first 22 years of my life before taking up golf, so my natural tendencies are to resort to what my body knows.  I'm not stretching nearly as much as I should be, and this is the reason I can't, not won't, keep my left arm straight.

I've tinkered so much with my stance and closing my shoulder that I'm completely twisted around.

Left arm straight at the top isn't a priority to play good golf.  Fred Couples plays that way, for example.  I generally don't like to pattern my swing after someone who is one of the most naturally talented athletes in the game, though.  As far as athleticism, well, I'm a programmer for a living.  That should give you enough info.  I try to build a swing that works the way my body wants to move in the most efficient way possible.

I'm not going to lie, swinging like Jamie Sadlowski takes a lot of raw athleticism.  If I were 22, I might try it.  Heck, I did try it for a while.  I just got frustrated with not being able to hit the ball where I wanted to.  If you are committed to this way of swinging, great for you.  Just get your arms higher in the air and you should do fine.

As far as stance is concerned, with the driver, square to slightly closed is fine.  Shut is not what you want.  The stance is there to provide a foundation for your body to move efficiently against.  If your stance is open, you are going to find it more difficult to move laterally toward the target, simply because the left hip socket would be out in front of the toes instead of over the femur, putting you off balance.  So you tend to turn the hips more which tends to pull the path to the left in an effort to remain balanced.  Reverse all that for the driver.  Slightly left path works fine with irons, works not-so-fine with driver.

Check your stance by placing something straight on your heels, not your toes.  Also, lay down a rod or club pointing at your target roughly along the target line.  Step back and see if they are parallel, closed, or open.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by bunkerputt

Get your arms higher in the air on the backswing

With the arms higher, they can drop some onto the right downswing plane.

One question I would ask, If your natural tendency (I believe everyone's natural tendency), is to match your arm plane and shoulder plane, why not just make a steeper shoulder turn, get the left shoulder pointing down at the ball, and the arms will get higher in the air as a result?  Just putting a bug in your brain...


If you could, bp, clarify some of what you've said. You told this fellow to get his arms higher in the air, showed a picture of Sadlowski, and then gave some advice regarding the shoulders.

Though as you suspect I agree with the shoulder pitch bit, I completely disagree with anything related to "arms higher in the air." My one question is simply this: why would you lift your arms higher in the air so that they can "drop"? Dropping is not an "in-plane" motion and is thus wasted effort. Why not put the hands and arms in a position where they can deliver their force straight down the plane without having to first "drop" to begin with?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

By no means am I committed to this swing, I just had no idea what I was doing wrong to cause the problem.  I definitely need to stretch more and focus on keeping my let arm straight.

I'll await the verdict on getting my hands higher in the air.


Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

If you could, bp, clarify some of what you've said. You told this fellow to get his arms higher in the air, showed a picture of Sadlowski, and then gave some advice regarding the shoulders.

Though as you suspect I agree with the shoulder pitch bit, I completely disagree with anything related to "arms higher in the air." My one question is simply this: why would you lift your arms higher in the air so that they can "drop"? Dropping is not an "in-plane" motion and is thus wasted effort. Why not put the hands and arms in a position where they can deliver their force straight down the plane without having to first "drop" to begin with?


Sure.  First, to comment about the general direction I sent him in...  I agree with you, first off, that a "drop" takes some timing, and in general, we want to eliminate as much of this as possible if we are going to be machine-like ball strikers.  I'm not sure how much physical effort is wasted in this case, though, because gravity should be doing most of the work.  As Nicklaus said, the first move in the golf swing is a "gravity" move.  I'm trying to give the OP advice that will help him hit the ball better with his current mechanics .  I don't know the OP, so I can't say he is gung-ho about a total swing overhaul.  Not everyone is that way.  There's a lot to be said about taking someone where they're at, giving them confidence that some parts are good, and making small, digestible changes.  That is the basic advice I was giving him while leaving the door open for what I think is the right long-term fix, steeper shoulder turn.  Not sure if I actually accomplished that or just got him confused and in the wrong direction, so thanks for engaging here.

He has a flat shoulder turn and an arm drop.  Without changing this, he needs to get the club above his shoulder plane so that the club is on the right downswing path.  He has a fairly flat shoulder turn, as does Sadlowski.  I picked Jamie for comparison because their positions seemed somewhat similar to me.  Jamie uses the high arms and a drop for leverage.  He starts the arms above the shoulder plane:

js1.jpg

Then he drops them down in line with the shoulders on the downswing:

js2.jpg

Pulls them down like crazy and produces a square downswing path where the club is pointing at the ball:

js3.jpg

Mr. Putz looks like this at a similar moment in the swing:

inside.jpg

His arms haven't gotten back in front of his body and his club path is too much from the inside with the club pointing way outside the target line.  This is all because his arms at the top were too flat and not enough in front of his body.  Presumably, this is because he's trying to get leverage to hit the ball hard.  Without fighting that instinct, he needs to try to keep the right arm a little straighter at the top and try to push his arms away from his torso instead of behind it to create width if he wants to swing this way.  His arms also don't look like they were working as aggressively as Jamie's to get the club down to the ball.  Maybe you can comment and give him something to consider as an instructor.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


Posted

In thinking about it, I think the language "get the arms higher so they can drop" is probably misleading because I'm definitely not advocating an active arm drop of any kind.  I think a better way to describe what I'm trying to say is try to feel like you are keeping the arms more in front of the torso.  They will be pinned against the chest, but to Mr. Putz it will probably feel like they are out in front a la Jim Flick.  With them higher (actually on-plane instead of below), the natural motion of the hips going forward on the downswing will make it look like the club "drops" from the top instead of dropping below the plane.  I'm just saying the shaft will appear to flatten some causing the look of a drop without an active drop of the arms.

[ Equipment ]
R11 9° (Lowered to 8.5°) UST Proforce VTS 7x tipped 1" | 906F2 15° and 18° | 585H 21° | Mizuno MP-67 +1 length TT DG X100 | Vokey 52° Oil Can, Cleveland CG10 2-dot 56° and 60° | TM Rossa Corza Ghost 35.5" | Srixon Z Star XV | Size 14 Footjoy Green Joys | Tour Striker Pro 5, 7, 56 | Swingwing


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by bunkerputt

I'm not sure how much physical effort is wasted in this case, though, because gravity should be doing most of the work.

What Nicklaus "felt" is really not all that important, as feel isn't real.

The thing with any gravity-style "drop" is that gravity is too slow. We accelerate at much faster than 9.8m/s^2.

Originally Posted by bunkerputt

I'm trying to give the OP advice that will help him hit the ball better with his current mechanics.

I'm not sure what that means, exactly. :-) If his current mechanics remain then he'll swing the same. FWIW, a steeper shoulder turn isn't a "long-term" fix. Tilt to the left more. Done. We teach students to do this day in and day out. Takes a few swings.

Originally Posted by bunkerputt

His arms haven't gotten back in front of his body and his club path is too much from the inside with the club pointing way outside the target line.  This is all because his arms at the top were too flat and not enough in front of his body.

I could say more, but as you know your arms don't stay in front of your body. Your left arm for example moves across your chest. If it fails to "unload" or get back the other way across your chest properly you can get into some bad positions.

As I see it Mr. Putz can do a few things. Four, specifically.

  1. Line up properly. Or close to properly. More bend at the waist, a rounder back, and eyes looking more directly at the golf ball.
  2. Tilt left more during the backswing (left shoulder down) to make sure the shoulder plane matches the one established in the setup.
  3. Feel like his right arm never flexes. This will prevent the backswing with the arms from going waaaaaay too long.
  4. Karate chop to get the arms down faster. The shoulders are well too far open, the right elbow way too far behind the right hip, at impact.

That's what I'd do with a brief explanation. I was mostly just trying to get the explanation out of you. I don't care if people have different ideas, tips, drills, suggestions... that's good. I do like it when the reasons for the suggestions are given, though, so the recipient can make a more informed decision.

Originally Posted by bunkerputt

In thinking about it, I think the language "get the arms higher so they can drop" is probably misleading because I'm definitely not advocating an active arm drop of any kind.  I think a better way to describe what I'm trying to say is try to feel like you are keeping the arms more in front of the torso.  They will be pinned against the chest, but to Mr. Putz it will probably feel like they are out in front a la Jim Flick.  With them higher (actually on-plane instead of below), the natural motion of the hips going forward on the downswing will make it look like the club "drops" from the top instead of dropping below the plane.  I'm just saying the shaft will appear to flatten some causing the look of a drop without an active drop of the arms.


I don't think his arms are "below plane," but what plane are you interested in seeing him swing on? Elbow plane? Turned shoulder plane? Some other plane? There are of course an infinite number of planes.

He's pretty well on the elbow plane. His arms are slightly higher than his shoulder plane IIRC (can't download videos from Flickr easily, so I've only looked at it in a cursory fashion), so you could say they "mismatch" but that's more a matter of the shoulder plane being too flat, not something else. Why does he drop it inside, then? Because he has to in order not to come right over the top of it. But fixing that is akin to fixing the result, not the cause. At least in my opinion.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by johnthejoiner

I hear this "feel isnt real" catchphrase used way too often, at what point does feel become real

That's the point. It doesn't.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5206 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.