Jump to content
Note: This thread is 4776 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Its a judgement call but its best not to touch the line of putt at all if it can be avoided, even if you think you are a few inches outside.

If I was in charge of the R&A; I would propose an amendment to the ruling to allow tapping down of spikemarks within two feet of the hole. Rarely does a ball get deflected from its line outside this distance (unless its a particularly evil spikemark) because its speed is sufficient for it to be maintained. However around the hole where the ball is supposed to be travelling slowly, the ball can be seen to move off at a rather alarming tangent!!

This said I do indeed realise that telly golfers could do with being chased with a cattle prod to prevent the current glacier pace at which they play and this little rule change adds a few seconds on to each hole. Still, I think it might improve the golfing experience enough to warrant this.

Thoughts?


I've been behind some heavy footed golfers in my day... I tamp a lot down that is not in my line and more as I am leaving. I have played for years with a guy who sometimes gets excited when putting and does this slide move to encourage the ball into the hole (I call it "the Jimmy"). He twists his feet and scratches up the green something awful. I point it out to him every time he does it (he apologizes and does not seem to be able to stop himself) and then I repair all his fresh spike marks. He's getting better, but come on. Why should the poor slob behind us suffer from "the Jimmy?"

Like some other rules, not being able to tamp down a spike mark seems a bit random and seems to gives advantage to the lucky and to those with tee times in front of the heavy spike guys. Seems to me to be a bit outside the spirit of the game -- IMO.

I'm no scientist, but it also seems that the impact of a spike mark is enhanced as the greens get faster, And greens all over are getting faster. So, it seems to me that the advantage disparity will keep increasing if later groups can not fix spike marks.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts


Originally Posted by rustyredcab

not being able to tamp down a spike mark [...] seems to gives advantage to the lucky and to those with tee times in front of the heavy spike guys. Seems to me to be a bit outside the spirit of the game -- IMO.


Everyone is equally likely to get good luck.  It's not fair to call that an "advantage."  The spirit of the game is to play the ball as it lies.

And you really don't want ot go down this road. Luck is often a factor in much more significant ways than a spike mark on your line---I'd wager that an awful lot more strokes are saved when sliced tee shots ricochet off trees back into the fairway than are lost due to imperfections on the putting green.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


  • 2 weeks later...

i would read it as nothing should go in the line of the put, but it you wanted to place a putter next to it, dont see why not!


Note: This thread is 4776 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 335 - More putting work, with the focus on setup and hitting the sweet spot. 
    • Day 153: putted for a while using the 2 cups drill inside. Working on bead primarily. Contact was really good. 
    • Day 8: 12/17/2024 Okay I took my new PPJ swing thought to the range today. I wasn't sure I was quite ready to do so, but I'm glad I did.  When I got it right it was good... really good. When I got it wrong it was a major fail. I hit lots of really ugly ones. But I didn't let that deter me. I stayed committed and focused on the PPJ and I avoided any temptation to go back to what I was doing before just so that I could "look" better at the range. I'm pretty excited about what I saw when I got it right.  I hit the 6 iron mostly (nearly all block work today). I also hit about 6 balls each with the PW, 8I, 5W and Driver. Those had varying degrees of success. I did crack one drive that let me feel and see what the changes will look like once I get fully trained.  Anyway, I'm going to go back to the mirror work for a couple of more days before bringing it back to the range. I do feel like if I can get this right my swing will improve a lot. So I think its worth the effort. I liked the way it looked on GEARs when I get it right, and I like the results I got at the range when I got it right. Now the goal is to work towards getting it right more often. 
    • So I think it's that they can't just bend the shaft or hosel to get it to a new lie angle. They adjust that and it changes the weighting, so they have to then adjust all the weights to get it balanced again. I get the impression that it's a bit of an iterative process and they do it all in the US, so they're paying US labor costs to build it and make it work how it's supposed to. Whether you believe in the tech or not, I think that's a true statement.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...