Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5215 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have always fought a slice, and I have a driver with 3 weights in it. Changing the weights to a certain pattern will promote a draw.

First question: Does this really make that much difference?

Second question: Would doing this hinder me from getting to the root cause of what has been making me slice?

I never really fooled with the weights, kind of just thought they were a gimmick.


Posted

If I am not mistaken ...

More weight in the heel promotes a draw, more weight at the rear of the club promotes higher ball flight, and obviously the opposites hold true as well.

My old driver (pre-adjustability) has lead tape on the heel for the same reason.  However, it's only one small piece (3g, I think) and apparently the weight difference has to be much more significant than that (10g I hear??) to move the CG.  Maybe it was the placebo effect for me.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Its a bit complicated in the math, but it would take a pretty good amount of weight. Also the weights only really help people out if they have high swing speeds. The gear effect with the driver is more pronounced at higher clubhead speeds.

If you have a neutral set up on a driver, adding 15 grams to the outside to promote a  draw,

115mph Club head speed = 17.5 yards of draw

85mph club head speed = 6.5 yards of draw

Its easier to think of it like this, if i hit a 30 yard draw, i am only now going to hit a 24.5 yard draw. So lets not get all excited about this. For a good player, who might want a bit more right to left, who has a good swing speed, yeah you could benefit from this driver. For the average golfer, who has a slice, i would work on the swing path. Also, what if you change drivers in the future, you gotten your swing to to were, hey i am only 6.5 yards right, i hit this thing straight now. But you change drivers, don't get the same weighting, your going to hit it 6.5 yards right. I rather see people work on there swing, then try to get technology to fix it for them.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by saevel25

I rather see people work on there swing, then try to get technology to fix it for them.



That's what I was thinking...... Thanks


Posted


Originally Posted by awesome1975

Quote:

Originally Posted by saevel25

I rather see people work on there swing, then try to get technology to fix it for them.

That's what I was thinking...... Thanks



Check out an older driver - the Mizuno MP-600 with moveable weights. You can set it up to favour staying open or closed at impact. It's not a bandaid solution to anything. It's about finding a club setup that you prefer. Get your drives to start going straight left, or drawing left, then you'll have the confidence to set up and swing a out toward the right. Who cares what someone else prefers - it's your game?!?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Originally Posted by saevel25

If you have a neutral set up on a driver, adding 15 grams to the outside to promote a  draw,

Sounds like I got it backwards then??  Heavier weight goes to the outside to promote draw?

(Actually I just checked the TM website for the R11 and they say to put the 10g weight it the heel and the 1g weight in the toe to promote a draw flight.  Incidentally, the opposite promotes a neutral setup and a straight ball flight.)

I agree with everything else saeve said too about you being better off with a neutral club setup and fine tuning your swing.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Quote:

Originally Posted by saevel25

If you have a neutral set up on a driver, adding 15 grams to the outside to promote a  draw,

Sounds like I got it backwards then??  Heavier weight goes to the outside to promote draw?

(Actually I just checked the TM website for the R11 and they say to put the 10g weight it the heel and the 1g weight in the toe to promote a draw flight.  Incidentally, the opposite promotes a neutral setup and a straight ball flight.)

I agree with everything else saeve said too about you being better off with a neutral club setup and fine tuning your swing.



BG_01_02.jpg

http://thesandtrap.com/b/clubs/mizuno_mp-600_review

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

oops, i got it backwards then.. thx

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5215 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
    • Thanks, interesting to read. The swing is definitely very timing dependent. I hit it consistently I guess but consistently bad.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.