Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4835 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been having some trouble off the tee for about 6 months now, so I went in on the launch monitor to get some numbers and figure some things out.  I am currently gaming the R9 460 with Aldila DVS60 Stiff flex and have lost all confidence in it when it's in my hands.  It just felt dead to me lately, like nothing was going anywhere anymore except high, short and right.

So while I'm there hitting, I notice that my launch angle is extremely high (18 degrees) and spin was huge.  So I grabbed a few other drivers they had laying around to compare to my current R9.  I hit a few of them (G15, G20, I20, R11S, Rockeballz, and the new Adams) and finally picked up the 10.5* RAZR X with a Motore F8 Regular flex and gave it a swing.  My first drive was straight down the middle, 246 yards with an 11* launch angle.  This driver is a bit longer than my R9, so I made a little change, moving the ball a bit further up in my stance and the launch angle went to 13* and 254 yards.  The spin was 2000rpm's lower than my R9 as well.  I kept hitting it and every shot was straight down the middle.  I did try to put a big cut on one, and even it only drifted to the right side of the fairway on the launch monitor.  No matter what I did, that thing went straight and the dispersion was pretty tight for a hacker like me.

So $249 later, I walked out with it.  My first trip to the course with it is tomorrow so I'll report back after that.  The only thing I really don't like about it are the graphics on the top.  I've always been a plain black type of guy with one small alignment mark, but the way I hit this thing compared to my R9, I can put up with the graphics on the top.


  • Moderator
Posted

Sounds great.  I just shipped this driver to a staff member so he can write a review within the next month.  Look forward to hearing your thoughts.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Initial results are decent.  With the 46" shaft, it took some getting used to, I started out hitting everything off the heel.  Once I made a few adjustments, it was good though.  On well struck shots, I would say it's about 10 yards longer than my R9, although the shaft length is probably most of the reason for that.  Combined with the Motore F8 shaft, I will say that if you are a high ball hitter, you will not be happy with this one.  My ballflight was higher than normal all day, which for me wasn't a bad thing in most cases.


  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I had the same experience with the R9 when I changed to the Diablo Octane last year.   Better distance, better control, better dispersion pattern.

Now I am considering the new Razr Black to replace the Octane.  Not sure if it is worth the change or not.


Posted

I had some consistency problems with the 46" shaft in the RAZR.  I cut it down to 45" and hit the same exact baby fade every time now, and even picked up some distance.


Posted

Im reading here that the RAZR shaft is actually longer? I always thought that Callaway made shorter drivers than Callaway (I've been out of the driver game for about 2 years).  Is it just the RAZR X driver that has the longer shaft now? cause when I bought my FT IZ it was a toss up between that and a Taylormade superfast burner.  Went with the IZ because the shaft was a good 1+ inch shorter.

Driver: RBZ 9.5° Stiff

Woods: :nike:VR_S Tour 2.0 15° Stiff

Hybrids:  910H 21° Stiff

Irons: 4-GW Pro Black CB1 with Project X rifle 6.0

Wedges:CC Jaws 56°.14° 60°.08°

Putter: Classic 1

Ball:  Z-Star XV Pure White


Posted

The concern I have with the new RAZR Black is the 1 degree open for the 8.5 and 9.5 drivers.   Where my 9.5 Octane is Square.

Also wondering the difference between the Octane shaft (Project X) and the Black shaft (Fujikura Motore F8) but the shafts have same weight, same torque, and same kick point....

I guess the best way to see is go hit some and see how it goes for me and my game...


  • 5 months later...
Posted
Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

I had some consistency problems with the 46" shaft in the RAZR.  I cut it down to 45" and hit the same exact baby fade every time now, and even picked up some distance.

I see you have a Srixon driver in your sig now.  Did you decide the Razr was not a good fit for you?  My Diablo Edge developed a crack, and Callaway is replacing it with a new Razr X Black, so I'm curious as to what your thoughts are with this driver if you aren't playing it anymore.


Posted

I still own it, but am not currently playing it because of some issues with my swing.  The face is pretty shallow, and I was having a lot of problems hitting the ball low or high on the face.  I switched to the Srixon for a while because it has a deeper face, which helps mask this swing fault that has developed lately.


Note: This thread is 4835 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.