Jump to content
Note: This thread is 1799 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

imho the course is what it is , and it is up to the golfer to navigate what is there . I have played on turtle shell greens . I have played from the middle of the fairway on some par fours with no second shot other than a hail mary  because I was to long or short. I have played from behind trees in the middle of the fairway . I have had my ball land less than a foot away from the pin and back off the green . in every one of these situations, I was at fault . You must match your shot to the course , not the other way around . oh and jmho . Mark

cleveland Hibore xls 8.5* driver
Cleveland Hiborexls 13* 3 wood
Ping S 56
Nike oz putter


Originally Posted by trickymicky69

Why not just make the green smaller?

I think that from ANYWHERE on the green it should be POSSIBLE that you should be able to make a one putt

Even if that means its very unlikely

With greens like that we would need a BUR stat (bunker in regulation)

I've played courses designed by Alistair MacKenzie with boomerang shaped greens and if your approach lands on the wrong area there is no chance to one putt. There are plenty of greens where you can't one putt if you are on the wrong part of the green. I've seen this on the PGA tour where a player was on the green and couldn't play to the pin without using a wedge.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think what people can't accept is that if you are on the wrong side of the bunker you MISSED the green for the way the hole is set up that day.  The fact that it landed on a very smooth tight surface is really incidental.  Actually, it's somewhat of a break.  It could have been in a creek or the heather, etc.  Since you missed the green, why should you still get the "reward" of a potential one putt?  The sense of entitlement over what is clearly a miss is curious.  Chip off the green if you must - and hope the super doesn't catch you, but consider, some misses hurt more than others.  Missing in the right spot is a big part of the game.  If you miss in a spot where you have an easy chip, then par/birdie is still in play.  If you miss in the wrong spot, then it's not.  Just have to get over it and do better next time.

  • Upvote 1

Originally Posted by parsnates

I think what people can't accept is that if you are on the wrong side of the bunker you MISSED the green for the way the hole is set up that day.  The fact that it landed on a very smooth tight surface is really incidental.  Actually, it's somewhat of a break.  It could have been in a creek or the heather, etc.  Since you missed the green, why should you still get the "reward" of a potential one putt?  The sense of entitlement over what is clearly a miss is curious.  Chip off the green if you must - and hope the super doesn't catch you, but consider, some misses hurt more than others.  Missing in the right spot is a big part of the game.  If you miss in a spot where you have an easy chip, then par/birdie is still in play.  If you miss in the wrong spot, then it's not.  Just have to get over it and do better next time.


Exactly! These are not long par 3's for most of as the 6th at Riviera only plays 144 yards from the white tees. If you are 60 feet away on the other side of the bunker, you missed badly and have to deal with the consequences.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 7 years later...

There is a course that I played a couple of tomes in Norther California with a par 3 that has a sand trap in the middle of the green.  I like it because it is challenging.  The sand trap to the left of the green and the ravine over the green actually gives me more trouble.  The problem is that I cannot remember the course.  Does anyone know it?

Thanks,

Alvin


  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/29/2012 at 6:20 PM, snofrog said:

imho the course is what it is , and it is up to the golfer to navigate what is there . 

^This


  • iacas changed the title to Greens with Bunkers in the Middle are Ridiculous
Note: This thread is 1799 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Maybe this is what you were getting at?  Doing some math. Comparing JumboMax versus Tour Velvet, standard size in both.  I got the force required using the JumboMax grip, to achieve the same rotational acceleration as the Tour Velvet, is about 1.37 more for the JumboMax grip. Interestingly, the Jumbomax grip is about 17% larger than the Tour Velvet, and 17% lighter for the standard size. I just substituted out the radius and mass of the JumboMax as a ratio of the Tour Velvet's mass and radius. This allows me to cancel out the mass and radius and get a ratio for the force. If you need 100 (force units of your choice) to achieve a certain rotational acceleration, you will need 137 (force units of your choice).  There was another thread on the forum about offset, where it basically just delays closure by some stupidly small amount. A lot of fun math there.  Most golfers have to go from about 90 degrees open clubface at A4 to square at A7. So, having a grip that requires more force to close that clubface might not be the best idea pending the golf swing.  A question is, since the clubface is open at A4, and square at A7. Does that mean you want most of the closure to happen from A4 to let say A6, and not A6 to A7, for better consistently (less timing at impact). Just a thought.     
    • This reminds me of the old game Telephone, where someone tells a story to someone, that person tells it to the next person, and after a few re-tellings you see how badly mangled the story gets.  Most golfers learn the rules in a similar fashion, learning from someone who really doesn't know the rules themselves.  This isn't really helped by the fact that many golf professionals aren't all that knowledgeable about the rules.  In addition, most golfers have been told that the Rules are SO complicated and SO difficult to read that they never try to read for themselves. Now, having vented a bit, is there anything in particular you'd like to read?  
    • I hope to see more posts from you, @DaveP043, related to your Rules experiences. I was looking at a thread on a golf site. Reading some of the comments and discussion on a Provisional/Lost/Unplayable situation was like listening to fingernails on a chalk board. So many comments such as, "You MUST search for your ball" and "If you find your ball in an unplayable spot, just go play your provisional." It is always amazing to me how little we golfers know of the Rules of Golf.
    • I could use the old man's excuse ... I am on a fixed income. That would be a fib. The event sounds like a great time. My wife and I will be in Brazil for 2 weeks in May and I can't fit this trip into the schedule. 
    • Wordle 1,320 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨⬜🟩🟩 🟩⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...