Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5008 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

If they are the TM 300s I'd keep em.  If they are the 320s or 360s I'd consider a new set.  IMO iron technology hasn't gone crazy lately, especially when it comes to players irons.  I typically only switch irons when they are beat to hell.  I'm playing irons I bought back in 2005.  Before that I played Ping Eye 2's that I had since the early 90's.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted

i've asked a similar question myself, irons haven't moved on so much, drivers most definately have!

i got a 2nd hand ping karsten driver and added 20+ yards to my driving.

i'm sticking with my slightly older irons (wilson fat shaft) because the only reason for me too change would be cosmetic.

 karsten 10deg driver

 fat shaft irons

 tour ii putter

prov1x


Posted

probably more important than new iron technology would be getting a proper fit for your game

Driver: Machspeed Black 9.5  

3 wood:  Insight  

Hybrid:   A4  19 degree

Irons:   CG red 4-PW  

Wedges:   CG12  56 degree and CG10 60 degree

Putter:  White Hot XG Sabertooth


Posted

I would say the shafts have had some advancements since the 90's but the players iron hasn't.  But as of drivers I would for sure take a look at a new one.  Just yesterday I tested my Taylormade 510 TP against a new driver and I added more launch and more ball speed which equals more distance.  Hope this helps.

In my bag:
MP 57's 4-PW KBS Stiff
Ping G 20 10.5* Stiff
Taylormade V Steel 3 and 5 wood

Bridgestone J33 R Hybrid 21* NV Shaft
Mizuno MP Quad Cut 52* and 56* Spinner Shafts

Scotty Cameron Newport Two TeI3


Posted

Originally Posted by Hoselrockets

I would say the shafts have had some advancements since the 90's but the players iron hasn't.  But as of drivers I would for sure take a look at a new one.  Just yesterday I tested my Taylormade 510 TP against a new driver and I added more launch and more ball speed which equals more distance.  Hope this helps.

Also if I recall correctly, TM was putting quality rifle shafts into every set of the 300 irons.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted

Thanks to all - advice much appreciated. Coupled with this, other internet research and a lesson / equipment chat with a trusted pro I have come to the following conclusions:

Irons. I would be able to 'perhaps' get slightly more distance with a new set, but this would be primarily because clubs have been delofted over the years (more cavity than blade but apparently true). There might also be some advances in consistency - but marginal. Ensuring they are the correct fit and correct shafts (yes - rifle 6) is more important than new club heads.

Driver. As said here, the pro reckons there is 20 yards waiting for me in a local golf shop

Also, it would seen swing emphasis has changed (probably not the right place for this but perhaps of interest). I was taught to drop it inside from the top and use fast hands to get my draw. Apparently I need to come down the same plane which will help me with consistancy & trapping it (thus the lower ball flight I wanted).

Oh and I've been using the wrong ball as well ! (pro V1x needed).

Went to range after lesson and it must have been a good lesson as I am hitting it like a pig.

Summary: Priortities: New Driver, new 3 wood, new balls, then new (ish) irons (probably the TM MB)

Thanks to all

JB


Posted

Originally Posted by jb291

Thanks to all - advice much appreciated. Coupled with this, other internet research and a lesson / equipment chat with a trusted pro I have come to the following conclusions:

Irons. I would be able to 'perhaps' get slightly more distance with a new set, but this would be primarily because clubs have been delofted over the years (more cavity than blade but apparently true). There might also be some advances in consistency - but marginal. Ensuring they are the correct fit and correct shafts (yes - rifle 6) is more important than new club heads.

Driver. As said here, the pro reckons there is 20 yards waiting for me in a local golf shop

Also, it would seen swing emphasis has changed (probably not the right place for this but perhaps of interest). I was taught to drop it inside from the top and use fast hands to get my draw. Apparently I need to come down the same plane which will help me with consistancy & trapping it (thus the lower ball flight I wanted).

Oh and I've been using the wrong ball as well ! (pro V1x needed).

Went to range after lesson and it must have been a good lesson as I am hitting it like a pig.

Summary: Priortities: New Driver, new 3 wood, new balls, then new (ish) irons (probably the TM MB)

Thanks to all

JB

I think "block and rock" is still a perfectly fine golf move.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted

Maybe so, and the easy thing would be to stay with it, but I don't have the time to perfect the timing (so to speak) and what he was saying makes sense to me. Down the line it is! Straighter, lower shots - just some way off yet!


Posted

Originally Posted by Mr3Wiggle

I think "block and rock" is still a perfectly fine golf move.

Block and Rock?  Never have heard of this before?

In my bag:
MP 57's 4-PW KBS Stiff
Ping G 20 10.5* Stiff
Taylormade V Steel 3 and 5 wood

Bridgestone J33 R Hybrid 21* NV Shaft
Mizuno MP Quad Cut 52* and 56* Spinner Shafts

Scotty Cameron Newport Two TeI3


Note: This thread is 5008 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.