Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Is the "Perfect" Swing overrated?


Note: This thread is 6796 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
When was Ernie's last win? 2004?

It doesn't matter that they won this year. Ernie's swing could still be better. Everyone on the PGA tour has nearly a

perfect swing. That's why their on the PGA tour. 150 guys out of all the golfer in the world. Those that win just place the ball. Winning on the PGA is all about placing it. Even Tiger says so. Someone could have a better swing, but if he doesnt place the ball good and makes bad decisions he can still lose easily.

in the bag

Driver: 909D2 9.5° Oban Devotion Shaft

3 Wood: G10 15.5°
Hybrid: 3dx RC 20° Ironwood 

4-PW: MP-57's S300

Wedges: 51° MP-T Black Nickel 56° Vokey Spin Milled 

Putter: Tracy II 35" Iomic Grip 

Ball: Pro V1x


Posted
It doesn't matter that they won this year. Ernie's swing could still be better. Everyone on the PGA tour has nearly a

You're telling me a player like Ernie Els, a 3-time major champion, just suddenly started making bad decisions about where to place the ball, and that's why he hasn't won on the PGA Tour for the last 3 years? That's absurd. Players on that level don't just wake up one day and forget where to land the ball, or what club to hit.

To qualify, Els has struggled with his putter, and he's had an injury to rehab. I'm not saying his swing is bad, nor am I saying his swing is the sole reason for his lack of wins. My contention is merely that the evidence doesn't support a claim of his swing being superior to all the other players on tour.

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two


Posted
There are far too many factors that go into winning versus losing. Ernie Els having the most "perfect" swing in no way would guarantee him ONE win at all, ever. I think you're drawing far too strong a correlation between winning and having the best swing.

Home Course:
Town of Colonie (69.7-70.1, 119-125)


Posted
There are far too many factors that go into winning versus losing. Ernie Els having the most "perfect" swing in no way would guarantee him ONE win at all, ever. I think you're drawing far too strong a correlation between winning and having the best swing.

I just think we're defining "best" and "perfect" differently. The best swing is the one that produces the best contact. That much I think we'd agree on. Here's the rub though: you and bflat450 have referenced the other factors involved in winning besides the swing. That reinforces my point! Ernie's record both on the PGA Tour and internationally proves that things like shot selection, course management, short game etc. aren't the reasons he's not winning. Els' record by year for ball striking: 2007: 71st 2006: 149th 2005: unavailable 2004: 92nd 2003: 38th Els' record by year for driving accuracy: 2007: 139th 2006: 171st 2005: unavailable 2004: 185th 2003: 161st I see no evidence at all to support the original claim of him having the best swing. If anything, he's won in spite of mediocre (by tour standards) ball striking.

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two


Posted
OK, fair enough. You're defining "best" swing as whatever swing allows for the best ball striking. I'm defining "best" swing as which swing is mechanically and physically the most likely to produce the best ball striking. You're basing your opinion on results while I'm basing mine on theory. Agree?

Home Course:
Town of Colonie (69.7-70.1, 119-125)


Posted
OK, fair enough. You're defining "best" swing as whatever swing allows for the best ball striking. I'm defining "best" swing as which swing is mechanically and physically the most

Agreed.

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two


Posted
I like to pride myself in the fundamentals of my swing. I have an athletic build and long muscles in my back and arms allowing me to properly bring the club back into the slot without much motion in my wrists and hands. Since i have reconstructed my swing, I have seen a drastic change in my ball flight. Instead of hitting high, weak fades, I now hit lower, strong draws. Not to mention the distance gained. I don't have to swing as hard to achieve the same results.

Adam Scott's swing is on plane the whole time. Even Tigers swing has a break down at the top, but he regains plane on his downswing. Anyway even with Scott's perfect swing he can't beat Tiger or get as many championship. I guess Tiger is just a freak

Posted
Is the "perfect" golf swing overrated? Obviously you want to maintain the basics throughout your swing, but if you have a little dip or slide or whatever, is that really a big deal? Is all this "Oh my god, I must re-do my swing compeltely!" crap overrated?

I've been thinking about that. My swing isnt pretty by anyone's standard, and ball striking consistency is an issue for me. Mainly because I have back issues, I am currently struggling with disc issues. I believe my swing is constantly changing to compinsate for pain. Eventually if i want to keep playing this game which i feel i can become very good at, i think i will have to get surgery which I believe will completely change my swing.. hopefully for the better.

: 905R 9.5*
904f 15*
Baffler DWS 20*
eye 2
spin milled 54*, Vokey 58* White Hot XG #9 Pro V1x


Note: This thread is 6796 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • That depends what you do within those two.  Are they your only options?   Check out Fit for Golf if you get a moment.  It's linked on the sidebar;  I did it for two years, stopped for a really bad reason, and I plan to get back to it soon.   Mike Carroll also has a great free podcast about a lot of topics in golf fitness. 
    • Day 19, 1/19.  Finished work in time to spend 25 minutes hitting balls (hit 15) indoors, off a mat, into the net.  Usual focus.    
    • Day 30 - 2026-01-19 Got 10 minutes in on the mat / net working on exagerrating movements I'm working on. And grip. Also worked with my friendly AI to summarize key negative tendencies I have so that I can build a personal checklist to follow. Will do more mirror work tonight.
    • What’s better for golf pilates or yoga?
    • I'm halfway thru 11.22.63 and I'm really loving it. It's only eight episodes. It came out in 2016, but has found new life since Netflix got it recently. I hesitate to say it's good, but I'm really enjoying it. I hope it ends well.   I'm nine episodes into Death Note, and that's been great too, also on Netflix. It's free on YouTube. I feel like that's been a legitimate good story so far. Not sure how long YouTube leaves it up, but here's the series (37 episodes of like 20 minutes each).  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.