Jump to content
IGNORED

Is the "Perfect" Swing overrated?


CG031
Note: This thread is 6182 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

When was Ernie's last win? 2004?

It doesn't matter that they won this year. Ernie's swing could still be better. Everyone on the PGA tour has nearly a

perfect swing. That's why their on the PGA tour. 150 guys out of all the golfer in the world. Those that win just place the ball. Winning on the PGA is all about placing it. Even Tiger says so. Someone could have a better swing, but if he doesnt place the ball good and makes bad decisions he can still lose easily.

in the bag

Driver: 909D2 9.5° Oban Devotion Shaft

3 Wood: G10 15.5°
Hybrid: 3dx RC 20° Ironwood 

4-PW: MP-57's S300

Wedges: 51° MP-T Black Nickel 56° Vokey Spin Milled 

Putter: Tracy II 35" Iomic Grip 

Ball: Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It doesn't matter that they won this year. Ernie's swing could still be better. Everyone on the PGA tour has nearly a

You're telling me a player like Ernie Els, a 3-time major champion, just suddenly started making bad decisions about where to place the ball, and that's why he hasn't won on the PGA Tour for the last 3 years? That's absurd. Players on that level don't just wake up one day and forget where to land the ball, or what club to hit.

To qualify, Els has struggled with his putter, and he's had an injury to rehab. I'm not saying his swing is bad, nor am I saying his swing is the sole reason for his lack of wins. My contention is merely that the evidence doesn't support a claim of his swing being superior to all the other players on tour.

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two

Link to comment
Share on other sites


There are far too many factors that go into winning versus losing. Ernie Els having the most "perfect" swing in no way would guarantee him ONE win at all, ever. I think you're drawing far too strong a correlation between winning and having the best swing.

Home Course:
Town of Colonie (69.7-70.1, 119-125)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


There are far too many factors that go into winning versus losing. Ernie Els having the most "perfect" swing in no way would guarantee him ONE win at all, ever. I think you're drawing far too strong a correlation between winning and having the best swing.

I just think we're defining "best" and "perfect" differently. The best swing is the one that produces the best contact. That much I think we'd agree on. Here's the rub though: you and bflat450 have referenced the other factors involved in winning besides the swing. That reinforces my point! Ernie's record both on the PGA Tour and internationally proves that things like shot selection, course management, short game etc. aren't the reasons he's not winning. Els' record by year for ball striking: 2007: 71st 2006: 149th 2005: unavailable 2004: 92nd 2003: 38th Els' record by year for driving accuracy: 2007: 139th 2006: 171st 2005: unavailable 2004: 185th 2003: 161st I see no evidence at all to support the original claim of him having the best swing. If anything, he's won in spite of mediocre (by tour standards) ball striking.

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two

Link to comment
Share on other sites


OK, fair enough. You're defining "best" swing as whatever swing allows for the best ball striking. I'm defining "best" swing as which swing is mechanically and physically the most likely to produce the best ball striking. You're basing your opinion on results while I'm basing mine on theory. Agree?

Home Course:
Town of Colonie (69.7-70.1, 119-125)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


OK, fair enough. You're defining "best" swing as whatever swing allows for the best ball striking. I'm defining "best" swing as which swing is mechanically and physically the most

Agreed.

Titleist 907D1 10.5°
Titleist 906F4 15.5°
Titleist 906F4 18.5°
Wilson Staff Pi5 3-P
Titleist Vokey 56.14Cleveland CG12 60°Scotty Cameron Newport Two

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I like to pride myself in the fundamentals of my swing. I have an athletic build and long muscles in my back and arms allowing me to properly bring the club back into the slot without much motion in my wrists and hands. Since i have reconstructed my swing, I have seen a drastic change in my ball flight. Instead of hitting high, weak fades, I now hit lower, strong draws. Not to mention the distance gained. I don't have to swing as hard to achieve the same results.

Adam Scott's swing is on plane the whole time. Even Tigers swing has a break down at the top, but he regains plane on his downswing. Anyway even with Scott's perfect swing he can't beat Tiger or get as many championship. I guess Tiger is just a freak
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Is the "perfect" golf swing overrated? Obviously you want to maintain the basics throughout your swing, but if you have a little dip or slide or whatever, is that really a big deal? Is all this "Oh my god, I must re-do my swing compeltely!" crap overrated?

I've been thinking about that. My swing isnt pretty by anyone's standard, and ball striking consistency is an issue for me. Mainly because I have back issues, I am currently struggling with disc issues. I believe my swing is constantly changing to compinsate for pain. Eventually if i want to keep playing this game which i feel i can become very good at, i think i will have to get surgery which I believe will completely change my swing.. hopefully for the better.

: 905R 9.5*
904f 15*
Baffler DWS 20*
eye 2
spin milled 54*, Vokey 58* White Hot XG #9 Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 6182 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 11: practiced chipping at home. 
    • I think in the Pure grips thread, there was another company mentioned that had similar product (Star maybe)
    • I'm a little late here, but I've been using Iomic grips for 12 or 15 years.  The last a long time, and stay really "grippy" for their entire life.  I prefer the X-Evolution, the texturing feels right to me. Full Swing — IOMIC USA  
    • Are there any alternatives to the kind of grips from PURE? I still got them on mine and it’s too bad they are out of business, I really love the grips. Perhaps I should buy some before they are out of stock.
    • The good part first. Short game has improved a lot. Not that it took much to improve, and there’s still work to do, but I feel more confident. It’s fun to practice. “Soft hands” has become an important element when working on chipping and pitching. When I set up for a chip with ball in the middle, leaning forward, loading the club a little in the transition, the hands doing too much is almost the only thing that can go wrong. For the pitch I want the hands even less involved, but it feels like a softer grip and being less handsy helps on chipping as well. Now, full swing. I now remember what it was like playing with a slice. “Slice” to me is like “Voldemort” to the wizards. It’s absolutely abysmal. I can take a fat or thin shot, but a slice is the worst. Getting my path sorted out is sorely needed. I have signed up for Evolvr again and trust they will help me get there. I see a lot of issues I’ve worked on before. I’ll take it a step at the time in whatever order they recommend. Backswing is too long, rotating the shoulders too much, not getting enough weight forward, not extending through the downswing, pulling, slicing. I’m very happy to be able to use Golf Evolution for this work.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...