Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4931 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

For those of you that can hit 280 - 330 yard drives, what do you think contributes most to your ability?  Is it the swing technique?  Is it the raw power you inject into your swing?

The reason I ask is because I was at the range the other day.  As I was walking along the range I saw this guy drive a couple balls.  It was so wild because it was like his swing was so "soft" yet the ball just took off like it was a rocket nice and straight.  His swing also seemed a little unothrodox, it was like during his back swing he allowed his head to move back to his right shoulder and then give this nice sweeping drive.

I want to learn how to have a nice solid drive but not have to "crush" the ball to do it.


Posted

Thread has the potential for some epic BS.

  • Upvote 4

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted
Originally Posted by Mr3Wiggle

Thread has the potential for some epic BS.

Amen! My first reaction to "For those of you that can hit 280 - 330 yard drives" was that it will be answered by a lot of broomstick cowboys who have convinced themselves they hit it that far because one day downwind and downhill on a concrete hard fairway they hit one over 300.

Regards,

Big Wave

Golf is the only sport in which a thorough knowledge of the rules can earn one a reputation for bad sportsmanship - Patrick Campbell.


Posted

tension free swing is paramount imho.  also a loose grip, and accelerating through impact works for me.  i'm not claiming to hit the ball anywhere near the 330 end of the spectrum - i'd imagine i'm somewhere > 280, < 300 with a typical, well struck hit with my driver.

using a cut down shaft, and a 240cc driver head helped tremendously for me as well.


Posted
Originally Posted by Mr3Wiggle

Thread has the potential for some epic BS.

In all honesty, this is about the most honest answer that you would receive from a thread like this unfortunately - without Erik and co. intervening and offering suggestions/tips if you're able to provide a video of your swing.

Me, personally, I feel like I can't even tell you "what I do" to achieve a "longer than average drive". I am using quotes because I feel weird talking about how far I hit the ball. It's kind of like telling another fisherman at the dock that you caught a 20lb. bass but lost it because it jumped out of your livewell lol.

Anyway, my swing speed is right around 104. For me, I don't feel like I am trying to crush the ball though. This is the speed that I am comfortable with.

If you feel like you're trying to crush it, or have knowledgeable/good golfers commenting on your swing saying things such as... "Man, you're coming out of your shoes...", or "Yeah... swing harder that will help", that's a sure sign that you're over doing it.

That's really the only advice I can give you without going into the realm of stroking myself or sounding as credible as a politician.

I do golf with 2 guys that are half my size in weight and slightly shorter than I am who make the drive seem effortless and end up on the fringe, or on greens 300+ out (of course the condition of the fairways, contour of the land, wind, etc. play a role in this). They also have a swing speed of 110+ though but they're just naturally able to achieve massive club head speed on their down swing due to having nearly flawless mechanics for their style of game.


Posted

Yeah I didn't word my opening post well.  I should have just left it at 280+ yards, 330 is rediculous.  I'm happy with a 260 yard drive and not having to he-man it there...just solid technique that allows my club to do the work.  I also wanted to add that this guy had a taylor made r11s or something like it, so he was working with nice gear.


Posted
Originally Posted by Stargaze

Yeah I didn't word my opening post well.  I should have just left it at 280+ yards, 330 is rediculous.  I'm happy with a 260 yard drive and not having to he-man it there...just solid technique that allows my club to do the work.  I also wanted to add that this guy had a taylor made r11s or something like it, so he was working with nice gear.

In the immortal words of Jack Hamm, "POW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted
Originally Posted by Infamous 273

tension free swing is paramount imho.  also a loose grip, and accelerating through impact works for me.  i'm not claiming to hit the ball anywhere near the 330 end of the spectrum - i'd imagine i'm somewhere > 280, < 300 with a typical, well struck hit with my driver.

using a cut down shaft, and a 240cc driver head helped tremendously for me as well.

So these large [huge even] driver heads are great for being forgiving but they take away some distance correct?


Posted
Originally Posted by Stargaze

So these large [huge even] driver heads are great for being forgiving but they take away some distance correct?

i can only speak to the results i've had in the past with the 460, and 46+" shafts.  more forgiving, i guess; more difficult to control, and less consistent for me, yes.  i can go at the ball a lot faster with a shorter/stiffer shaft.  i can't tell if the 460 takes away distance bc i was never consistent enough with it.  i'm definitely longer and straighter with my current driver - mainly bc i hit it a lot more pure with a ton more consistency.


Posted
Originally Posted by Stargaze

So these large [huge even] driver heads are great for being forgiving but they take away some distance correct?

No they are probably still longer.  The coefficient of restitution on a 400+cc clubhead is likely higher than the COR on a 240cc head.  If Phil Mickelson hit the Great Big Bertha (250cc head) and the latest and greatest Callaway (400cc+) he'd likely hit the newer club 20+ yards longer.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted
Originally Posted by Spyder

In all honesty, this is about the most honest answer that you would receive from a thread like this unfortunately - without Erik and co. intervening and offering suggestions/tips if you're able to provide a video of your swing.

Me, personally, I feel like I can't even tell you "what I do" to achieve a "longer than average drive". I am using quotes because I feel weird talking about how far I hit the ball. It's kind of like telling another fisherman at the dock that you caught a 20lb. bass but lost it because it jumped out of your livewell lol.

Anyway, my swing speed is right around 104. For me, I don't feel like I am trying to crush the ball though. This is the speed that I am comfortable with.

If you feel like you're trying to crush it, or have knowledgeable/good golfers commenting on your swing saying things such as... "Man, you're coming out of your shoes...", or "Yeah... swing harder that will help", that's a sure sign that you're over doing it.

That's really the only advice I can give you without going into the realm of stroking myself or sounding as credible as a politician.

I do golf with 2 guys that are half my size in weight and slightly shorter than I am who make the drive seem effortless and end up on the fringe, or on greens 300+ out (of course the condition of the fairways, contour of the land, wind, etc. play a role in this). They also have a swing speed of 110+ though but they're just naturally able to achieve massive club head speed on their down swing due to having nearly flawless mechanics for their style of game.

Thanks for the input.  When I am able to manage a 250 yard drive I am "coming out of my shoes".  So I'm going to work [have a lesson this Saturday] on having a fluid, sound, proper swing and just be happy with whatever I'm able to manage.

What I've learned this year is that a 280 yard drive means f*** all when you can't putt.  So my focus the next couple of months is going to be with my sandwedge and my putter.  This is where I'm going to be able to lower my handicap.


Posted
Originally Posted by Stargaze

Thanks for the input.  When I am able to manage a 250 yard drive I am "coming out of my shoes".  So I'm going to work [have a lesson this Saturday] on having a fluid, sound, proper swing and just be happy with whatever I'm able to manage.

What I've learned this year is that a 280 yard drive means f*** all when you can't putt.  So my focus the next couple of months is going to be with my sandwedge and my putter.  This is where I'm going to be able to lower my handicap.

That is exactly right and you're already ahead of a vast majority of golfers out there by realizing that. I am also in the same boat as my putting is why my HC has not been below a 10 in years.

I'm averaging a 272 yard drive but I don't even want to go into the average number of putts, or consistency from within 10 feet.


Posted
I'm happier with a 230 yd drive on the fairway than a 270 yd drive more often than not in the woods. Scoring well is all about control & keeping the ball in play - however, this does not apply for the elite players where distance is required.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Stargaze

Thanks for the input.  When I am able to manage a 250 yard drive I am "coming out of my shoes".  So I'm going to work [have a lesson this Saturday] on having a fluid, sound, proper swing and just be happy with whatever I'm able to manage.

What I've learned this year is that a 280 yard drive means f*** all when you can't putt.  So my focus the next couple of months is going to be with my sandwedge and my putter.  This is where I'm going to be able to lower my handicap.

I never understood why so many people are so concerned with hitting it far. I can hit it 300 if I really try, but there is no accuracy when I do it. Shots go all over the place. If I just do a normal swing and don't try to kill it, I average closer to 260ish.

One thing to, I just had a lesson and my coach had me change a few things. One big thing was to change my tempo. Seems to me like I am swinging slower, but the ball is going just as far, with better groupings.

I'll take a shot at 250 on the fairway over a shot at 320 in trouble any day. (not saying I hit it 320, just exaggerating to get the point across)


Posted
Originally Posted by Tuflehundon

I never understood why so many people are so concerned with hitting it far. I can hit it 300 if I really try, but there is no accuracy when I do it. Shots go all over the place. If I just do a normal swing and don't try to kill it, I average closer to 260ish.

One thing to, I just had a lesson and my coach had me change a few things. One big thing was to change my tempo. Seems to me like I am swinging slower, but the ball is going just as far, with better groupings.

I'll take a shot at 250 on the fairway over a shot at 320 in trouble any day. (not saying I hit it 320, just exaggerating to get the point across)

Well to be honest I wasn't so worried about hitting super far it was more how fascinated I was at watching this guy hit it far and it seemed like he was doing a nice casual swing.  If I see the guy again I'm going to see if he minds showing me his swing.  I don't know if that's creepy or not but it was such a fluid swing and the result was fantastic.


Posted
Originally Posted by Tuflehundon

I never understood why so many people are so concerned with hitting it far. I can hit it 300 if I really try, but there is no accuracy when I do it. Shots go all over the place. If I just do a normal swing and don't try to kill it, I average closer to 260ish.

One thing to, I just had a lesson and my coach had me change a few things. One big thing was to change my tempo. Seems to me like I am swinging slower, but the ball is going just as far, with better groupings.

I'll take a shot at 250 on the fairway over a shot at 320 in trouble any day. (not saying I hit it 320, just exaggerating to get the point across)

When a lot of people swing hard, they swing faster at the top of their swing, but have the same or slower clubhead speed through the impact zone as they would with a smooth swing.  Results in less accuracy and slower ball speed.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane 9.5*
3W:  Callaway GBB II 12.5*, 5W:  Callaway Diablo 18* Neutral
3H:  Callaway Razr X, 4H:  Callaway Razr X
5-PW:  Callaway X Tour
GW:  Callaway X Tour 54*, SW:  Callaway X Tour 58*
Putter:  Callaway ITrax, Scotty Cameron Studio Design 2, Ping Anser 4


Posted
Originally Posted by Mr3Wiggle

When a lot of people swing hard, they swing faster at the top of their swing, but have the same or slower clubhead speed through the impact zone as they would with a smooth swing.  Results in less accuracy and slower ball speed.

Yes.

I prefer to use width and lag and good tempo. I find that when I crush one, I end up holding my pose with great balance, which shows I swung with good tempo and stayed in my shoes.

dak4n6


Posted

the harder you swing at it the less likely you are to be able to find it. i think keys to consistence "long" drives are

1. hitting the ball in the center of the club face

2. using your upper AND lower body. not just swing your arms fast

3. good balance and timing

4. LAG and trajectory

look at old Freddy Couples. hes still crushing the ball at his age and finding fairways and it looks like hes just taking a smooth practice swing.


Note: This thread is 4931 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.