Jump to content
IGNORED

PureStrike 5SK, Stack and Tilt, Etc.


Note: This thread is 2465 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

A nice thread. Somewhat strange reading for a person living outside the good old USA.

To give you an idea. You are talking about differences in a teaching system (as I think I can discribe it) versus the total lack of knowledge in my country. I frequently meet teaching pro's who sometimes have read 'something' about S&T; let alone 5sk. The only thing they can mumble is it is a swing in which you stay on the left side, with overlooking all the positives. They keep hangin in the past, like rolling the wrists, keeping the knees bend etc. and everything else that comes with teachers who do not invest in themselves to evolve.

S&T; to me is easier to remember. It gives me great explanation. I have to work and think to bring elements of 5sk into my swing. But I find great joy in reading al sorts of explanations by MvMac and/or Iacas, let alone the great clips. Reading this sort of discussions remembers me how far behind we are in my country. I wish there would be a discussion about differences in my country. That would possibly means that we have teachers ready to take golf at a higher level.


I agree. Most of us on the forum never take what Erik, Mike and the rest of the pro's offer for granted. There is so much information here. The instruction isn't always clear for someone like me, but eventually I'll come across something while practicing or playing and it will click as to what was meant. These guys are the real deal.

As far as other teaching pros, even in this country (at least in my region of it) the majority of instruction is as you've described. I've taken lessons from three different people and the first thing they ask about or comment on is losing the flex in my back leg. It's why I'll likely not take any more lessons until I either sign up for Evolvr or, if by some miracle, a local instructor adopts this method of instruction.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

@taxgolf ,

Keep in mind that 5 Simple Keys in not a swing method like Stack & Tilt.  In fact, Stack & Tilt fits into 5SK, as do all good swing methods.  I started out using Stack & Tilt. I read book, had the videos and practiced it a lot, but eventually moved on because there were some things I just couldn't do.

I find 5 Simple Keys very easy to understand because it is "simple". There are only 5 things to remember.  You work to achieve them with your swing and body type.  You can have somewhat unique elements to your swing but still improve because you have a steady head, weight forward at impact, flat left wrist at impact, etc.

From the OP by @david_wedzik :

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

S&T; to me is easier to remember. It gives me great explanation. I have to work and think to bring elements of 5sk into my swing. But I find great joy in reading al sorts of explanations by MvMac and/or Iacas, let alone the great clips. Reading this sort of discussions remembers me how far behind we are in my country. I wish there would be a discussion about differences in my country. That would possibly means that we have teachers ready to take golf at a higher level.

Golf is hard. I don't want this to "sound" the wrong way but of course S&T; is "easier to remember". It's description of ONE way to swing a golf club. You don't have to consider the many things that might be going on within individual players (again, golf is hard, and you really need to consider those things) as you give them singular instruction.

5 Simple Keys® was specifically built to keep things as simple as possible for players learning the game while instructors learned to understand the things that go on to make those 5 Keys attainable. It's not as easy (for an instructor) as just hearing them once and remembering them... but for a golfer it is exactly that easy. That's the beauty of the system. Easy for golfers to understand and prioritize while the instructor (the one who, if he is worthy, gets paid by the golfer) has to grasp the why and how and variables that make things work.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2465 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • What happened at the last Ryder cup when USA lost, you said your team didn't play to their potential. I call that double standards, but no problem for me I can wait for the next Ryder cup and see if Europe play well or not, and what will USA do. Either way it's game of fun and friendship with a little competition mixed in, I enjoyed it....
    • Under the definition that I am familiar with, yes. Links courses to me, and I believe this is a fairly strict definition, are as follows: 1.) Oceanside 2.) Sandy turf 3.) Rolling dunes 4.) Land is unfarmable. This is one of the most important pieces, as it is how golf really picked up steam. Because the turf is sandy, dune covered, and close to the ocean, it makes it unsuitable for agriculture. Rather than the land just sit there unused, let's make a game that can be played on said land. 5.) Trees are minimal. This is a course feature, as well as a natural one, because the variety of trees that can withstand sea-spray (salt) is low. 6.) Deep bunkering which is often smaller in area than what is seen on parklands courses. 7.) Plenty of acreage of the course is left "natural". Long uncut fescue and gorse are common, though not required.   The challenges on these courses lie in the land itself more than "manufactured" hazards. The wind, unpredictable bounces, severe bunkers, and natural areas are the course's defense, as opposed to on course water and trees. Many courses in North America have this idea going for them, but may not be seaside, or may not be in that unfarmable strip of land.  
    • Two years is a long freaking time, 12 of the top 21 being on ONE team is a LONG shot to happen again. That's just the odds, man. So how much do you want to bet? For all you know it might be some South African kid in college right now, or three Korn Ferry Tour players. Two years ago did you think Patrick Cantlay would be OWGR 4? Heck no. What were the OWGR rankings of the previous six U.S. Ryder Cup team members? 12 inside the top 21 is really rare. 18 holes of match play, in a match that wasn't remotely close to interesting for the American player, doesn't prove that Brandel Chamblee was wrong about how poor of a ball striker Ian Poulter is right now. This speaks to that: SG: Approach the Green | PGA TOUR Stats Strokes Gained | Greens in Regulation | Accuracy from Fairway | Accuracy from Rough | Scoring | Going for it | Holeouts, Other Oh, gee, 141st. Oh, maybe he's a good driver? SG: Off-the-Tee | PGA TOUR Stats Strokes Gained | Distance (All Drives) | Distance (Measured Drives) | Accuracy | Scoring | Other | Radar Nope, 133rd. Poulter is a poor ball striker. His record in this Ryder Cup was (backward): He won his singles match against Tony Finau, who withdrew from the Dunhill Links due to an ongoing health issue, 3&2. He was waxed with Rory McIlroy by DJ/Collin, 4&3. He was waxed by Cantlay and Schauffele, while playing with Rory again, 5&3. Thus, he was 1-2-0 for the week. 1-2-0 is the "best result of the European players and most of the USA players"? On what f***ing planet? Because if you are — as you clearly are — only talking about singles matches, then that's just really dumb. Like I said, a "terrible take." BTW, Poulter won 3&2. He played the 16th hole. JT won 4&3. Bryson won 3&2. Scottie beat Rahm (who is a significantly better ball striker than Ian Poulter) 4&3. Cantlay won his match 4&2. And Rory won 3&2, too. So that's five other people, three of which are Americans, who either matched or beat Poulter's singles match play scoring… Like I said, a terrible take.
    • It doesn't matter if the guy is perfect or the girl is prefect, as long as they are perfect for each other. Good Will Hunting  
    • I live in Scotland guys, if you do make it over, give me a shout, would gladly meet up for a round..! brendan
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bandstan
      bandstan
      (51 years old)
    2. boobiemiles
      boobiemiles
      (30 years old)
    3. ButterCuts1372
      ButterCuts1372
      (36 years old)
    4. Dombaker
      Dombaker
      (25 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...