Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6927 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
topic came up at dinner last night.

which would have a greater effect-- a player playing with shafts too stiff for them or with too much flex.

my response was too much flex was better since you can slow down your swing speed with accuracy much more easily than you can speed it up. the other 2 guys disagreed.

What's in the bag:

Driver: Adams 9064LS (project RIP Shaft) 9.5 degree
3 Wood: Titleist 909R 14.5 degree
Hybrid 3-iron: 19 degree Tour Professional (bent to 18 degrees)Hybrid 4-iron: 21 degree Tour ProfessionalIrons: Tour X-20 5-PW Project X 6.0 shaftsGap Wedge: Mizuno MP10 52.08 Sand Wedge: Mizuno MP10 58.10 Lob Wedge: Nike 62.06


Posted
I also think too much flex, ive tried a driver with too much flex and your body is easily infront of the ball before the club is, which will easily cause a slice. Its awful.
In My Bag

Driver: Sasquatch 460 9.5°
3 Wood: Laser 3 Wood 15°
5 Wood: r7 19° (Stiff)Irons: S58 Irons 4-PW Orange DotWedge: Harmonized 60°Wedge: Z TP 54°Putter: Tiffany 34"Balls: Pro V1 Shoes: Adidas Tour 360 IIThe Meadows Golf Coursewww.themeadowsgc.comAge: 16

Posted
When i was 12 i tried out a driver in a launch monitor and it had regular flex and the ball would always horribly slice. The guy there gave me a driver with an extra stiff shaft and i hit it straight for some reason. Now with my swing speed i "should" have just a stiff flex but i always hit extra stiff better. So i think it is better to er on the stiffer side.

My bag
Driver-905R
3 wood-906 F2
hybrid- 583h 21*
irons- 695 CB royal precision project x (6.0)wedges- vokey spin milled 56 and 60putter- studio style newport 2


Posted
IMO overly stiff is better than overly whippy, (barely). I base this on the theory that straight and short is better than long and crooked. For brand new golfers I might reverse this since they wouldn't have as much ability to adjust.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
In theory a shaft that is not stiff enough is better for you because you can reduce your swing speed to adjust, while the opposite may not be true. Now I lean more towards the stiffer shafts in actual practice because I can not swing slow enough to consistently hit the ball with a shaft that is not stiff enough.

Posted
I'd rather the shaft be too stiff. Before I got new clubs around a month ago, I was playing with shafts with too much flex & it was awful. No matter how good of a swing i put on the ball, the club head was staying open, causing me to hit a bad slice.

Posted
if you have a tendency to block a shaft that's too loose, I would say you aren't getting a good whiplash effect with your hands.

if you notice on all the swing videos out there on the net, the best swings (like tiger's swing)...you'll see the following:
you'll see tiger's legs stop moving, then you'll see his shoulders stop moving, then you'll see his arms stop moving. The final move of tiger's down swing are his wrists. When you get this uncoiling move that all powerful golf swings have, you'll tend to hook your drives when using an overly flexible shaft.

If you tend to leave the face open with an overly flexible shaft, you aren't maximizing your distance potential b/c you aren't uncoiling properly.

That being said, I would always side with a stiffer shaft. Like the other poster said, straight and short is better than long and errant.

Trying to slow down your swing for a loose shaft brings too many variables into play. And if you are swing faster and faster? why slow down your swing? The only time I slow down my swing is when i'm under 110 yards in and have to use touch.

Driver: Callaway FT-5 Tour 9.5 neutral, Fujikura Fit-On 380 Shaft
3 Wood: Callaway X-Tour 13 degree, X-Stiff Steel Shaft
5 Wood/Hybrid: Callaway X-Hybrid 18 degree, Stiff Graphite Shaft
Irons: Cleveland CG2 Forged 3-PW, GW, SW, X-Stiff Steel Shaft
Putter: Scotty Cameron Pro Platinum NewportBal...


Posted
topic came up at dinner last night.

That's not exactly a well phrased question since flex itself influnces your swing. Too stiff will promote one thing while too flexible will promote another.

If what you meant to ask is "Which flex will promote a better swing, too stiff or too flexible?" then I would go with the latter. It promotes a stronger release and better timing of the armswing to the body. Too stiff and people usually end up trying to pull the club around causing them to loose their axis tilt. Plus with flexible shafts you can FEEL the clubhead and learn from it, but with too stiff you can't. You can only guess what the clubhead is doing by watching the ball fly.

Equipment, Setup, Finish, Balance, and Relax. All equal in importance and all dependent on each other. They are the cornerstones of a good golf swing.


Posted
Recently, my buddies ask me why I'm using a garden hose for a shaft (or so it seems from how much the club bends when I swing). I'm slicing and pulling all my drives, a problem which has only crept into my game in the last week or so. I'm using a regular flex shaft, and I will probably need to get my driver reshafted in a stiff - or extra stiff if my speed continues to increase like so.

Stiff or extra stiff? I swing at about 105, ball speed about 150, and bump the ball about 270 on a good day. I'm working on flexibility and particulary strength training - at 18, and plenty of room to get into better shape, should I get x-stiff, and simply "grow" into it, saving me a hundred dollars?

To answer your question - too stiff is better than too flex. Too stiff means you lose distance, but you can still hit it straight. Too flex causes sprayed shots. Better to be 30 yards shorter and in the fairway than 30 yards closer to the hole, in the trees.
"Shouldn't you be going faster? I mean, you're doing 40 in a 65..."

Driver: Burner TP 9.5*
3 Wood: 906F2 15*
2I: Eye 23I-PW: 3100 I/HWedges: Vokey Spin-Milled 56*06, MP-R 52*07/60*05Putter: Victoria IIBall: Pro V1xCheck out my new blog: Thousand Yard DriveHome Course: Kenton County...

Note: This thread is 6927 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I mean there has to be some thought. For eg., something like 'soft knees and wrists' at set up and maybe a dynamic 'left arm to chin' as a trigger to start DS. I have these one or two anchor thoughts and have served me well. In fact, my wildest swings are the one where I have no thoughts or if I forget to walk thru my anchor thoughts. In contrast my best rounds are where I am consistent with the anchor thoughts.    OTOH, if I am running my entire half hour lesson (hypothetical) with some pro that I had last Saturday or whatever before every swing then I'm probably in trouble before I even get over the ball.      
    • Two bits. Bit 1 The NCAA's appeal of Brendan Sorsby being granted a temporary injunction will not be heard until February, so there will be nothing to prevent Sorsby from playing the full season and potential CFP.  Bit 2 The Big Ten Conference will hold a meeting and is expected to ban all of its athletic programs from playing Texas Tech in the regular season. Georgia has done the same. The SEC will meet to consider a similar ban. Fellow Big 12 members TCU and Kansas State are spearheading a similar ban, but the conference charter might not allow it. Meanwhile, Big 12 athletic directors are meeting this week to explore what options the conference might have.
    • No, but I'm also in disagreement that golfers have no thoughts over the golf ball, and/or don't ever think I've met someone I truly believe is thinking nothing but "target" or something on most shots.
    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.