Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5041 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been working on a short film about space exploration and designing a large future rotating space colony. This structure would be a large can shape with about a 500m diameter (547yrds). In the process of designing the interior, I always try to imagine what I would want to see if I lived there myself. As an avid golfer, I obviously would not want to live in a community without a golf course (even if space is limited(...in space)).

I decided I could probably fit at least 3 holes (2 par 3's and a par 4) in the settlement. Since everything would be built from scratch, we could mimic any holes that we would like to play. I based the course around an edited Pebble Beach (Par 3 7th, Par 3 17th and shortened Par 4 8th). The greens would be synthetic grass and hydraulically operated so each green could change to a different layout at the click of a button. By playing 3 holes 6 times from different tees, you could actually play 18 slightly different holes.

Note: the physics in a zero gravity environment where the only force applied to the ball would be the centrifugal force applied by the rotating station plus the impact of the club, would drastically change the way we would have to play. ...and the putt would always break along the rotation axis of the structure.

Updates and high resolution images of the course and structure can be found here:

www.spacehabs.com/441354

Moving to a space station may be more appealing if you knew you could still get a tee time.

  • Upvote 2

Posted

Did you not stop at all to think whether this would actually be worth sharing?

Because if you did, I'm glad you made the right decision! That's cool as shit!

Do you get paid to come up with stuff like that?


Posted

Thanks Kapanda, I actually thought a long time about whether or not to post this project and where to post the images. I have a lot of artist and space buddies who don't golf so they can't imagine why we'd take up room in a space station for a small golf course. I figured that other golf lovers would appreciate why I would try. It's my design so if I say there is a golf course, then there is a golf course.

Unfortunately, although I do get paid to design conceptual visualizations for space exploration, this project is more of a labour of love at this point.

Thanks for your comment broomhandle. At 500m it is the minimum size that the structure could be and still generate 1G of force while rotating no more than 2 revolutions per minute. Studies show that anything more than 2rpm could be disorientating. If it is only 80% earth gravity then the slower spin rate would be fine. Definitely, bigger would be MUCH better, not only for a more moderate spin rate, but with the added space we could do 9 holes and eventually a full 18. This winter I would like to do a 1km diameter structure and even larger after that.


Posted

I don't know anything about space habitats, although it is damn cool, but the images you made are really sweet.

-Bryan

Bag: TM Superfast Driver, TM Burner '08 3W, GigaGolf Irons, Yes! Sandy Putter


Posted

Very cool images and concept.   I'm trying to get my head around the physics of the golf ball in this environment.    I can see how the centrifugal force creates artificial gravity when you're standing or otherwise attached on the outside of the rotating drum, but I would think that a object such as a ball that is not on that surface would simply free float in the internal atmosphere.   Ugh, it hurts trying to thing of the orbital dynamics of a golf ball suspended in a rotating atmosphere!


Posted

It is a pretty good exercise to imagine how the ball would react in such an environment. Once the ball is impacted then it will maintain its trajectory until it hits something else. If the ball was motionless and inserted into the void within the structure then it would float slowly for a while however the air within the structure would be moving with the rotation so the air itself would apply a small force to the ball. This would slowly force the ball to the outside of the rotation. The nearer you get to the axis of the rotation, the less air pressure would apply to any free floating object. We can theorize how this would effect the game of golf but ultimately, I think the first people who play will probably be inventing some shots that we would have a hard time imagining without being there. That would be fun.


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Holey Moley - this is pure awesomeness.

Well, e.g. Tiger woods has a small golf course in the backyard. So why not have yours as part of a space station :)

Dude, I'd love to play in space. Imagine the different gravity modes you could play in.

Take care,

Navid


Posted

Thanks Navid, like you said "why not?"

Kathy, the nature is important to me. One of the reasons I love golf is the nature of the places Im able to play. I walk my dogs in the woods everyday for the same reason. I've always loved walks in the park and would assume that people in the future, wherever they may live, will draw comfort from nature, no matter how artifical the rest of the environment may be. Even people living in small apartments can get joy out of a house plant in the corner of the room. A large space station will need larger house plants.


Note: This thread is 5041 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 37, June 10.  Today was primarily WFH, so I had several practice sessions (indoors, off a mat, into the net).  At least one each of U, 9, and 6-iron full swings with the usual priority.   I also tried a few times a putting type stroke with my 4H, as something I should probably learn how to hit (and what it does), but the mechanical shot at home off a mat doesn't tell me much of what it's doing.  That's something I should probably try on a real green, not during a round until I've tried it.
    • Day 10 (10 Jun 26) - Played in the midweek shootout at my home course - on aerated and sanded greens - day of trying to figure tempo to get the best roll on the greens.  Approach game was decently solid as was shots off the tee.  
    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.