Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Golf in Bulgaria

5 posts in this topic

I'm off to Balchik in Bulgaria for a 5 day golf trip next week. I understand there are three courses designed by Player and Woosnam and that one, Thracian Cliffs, has been mentioned in the same breath as Pebble Beach.

Whilst I'm not expecting that standard, does any one know how far below that standard it is?

Any other tips for golf in Bulgaria?


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Don't automatically assume that Thracian Cliffs will be a low-quality golf course.

Bulgaria is arguably the most stable of the Balkan nations - both socially and economically. Area has a strong agricultural sector, so the locals know how to grow things.

Gary Player has built quite a few golf courses, so I doubt he would go into a situation that wasn't likely to succeed.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So golf in Bulgaria, not Pebble Beach good, but very good all the same.

Getting there - 3 1/2 hour flight from London to Varna, 30 minute transfer to Balchick. All 3 courses are 15 min transfer from there.

3 courses - Lighthouse (Woosnam designed), Thracian Cliffs & Blacksea Rama (Both Player designed).

Lighthouse & Blacksea Rama on top of the cliffs, Thracian Cliffs - half way up the cliff!

Lighthouse is a little bland visually - a links style but with some lakes, and the rough is a little patchy. The greens are amongst the best and slickest I've played. The least good of the 3.

Blacksea Rama - a similar "links" style to Lighthouse, much better visually, a tough test of golf that will reward if you play well.

Thracian Cliffs - on a plateau between the two parts of the cliff. A very very tough test - 14 of us lost 118 balls between us, tight driving with long carries. Only misses out on being truely exceptional because the greens were a little slow and dead - but not bad by any stretch of the imagination. Lots of undulations and long trips between holes - a buggy is a must. Consider the standard of golfer in your group, we played of the Golds and it was too hard for many of our 20 plus handicappers.

Visually you'll struggle to find any where better.

Thracian Cliffs costs €100 including a buggy, the other are cheaper. Food and drink in the club house came to about £10 per person. Evening meals were £25 for 2 courses and lots of wine/beer. Food quality not haute cuisine but much better than I had anticipated. A bottle of the local beer was £1.

Balchik has a summer season from late May to end of August, so was quiet in September. It won't be a riotous night out even in season, head to Golden Sands for that - 30/40 mins away.

The locals are very friendly and helpful, all speak English and the important signposts are in both Bulgarian and English.

Overall an excellent golf venue - unless you want the wild nightlife to go along with it.

I'll happily go again.

Photos of Thracian Cliffs


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow...the last course is stunning.

Thx for your report of exotic locales to hit the links....glad you had a great time.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • I struggle with the concept that just because you make something easier, you make it "more fun".  A great deal of the "fun" comes from the challenge in this game.  
    • Hey, you know what they say about a guy without doubts. Why change now?
    • It's not something Tiger would make known to his closest confidantes, in fact it's not something he would want to acknowledge himself even.  So, notwithstanding your inside knowledge, I'll continue to believe that Phil's recent play and the thought of the whipping he'd get and the embarrassment that would be to him played some role in his late withdrawal. Given your knowledge, it may be true that he would have withdrawn regardless of Phil's participation but I don't doubt Phil's presence at the Safeway helped nudge him in that direction.  I concede that it may not have been the overarching reason.
    • For what ever reason, the hole size is what it is, been that way before you and I were born.
      Is it the best hole size? Who's to say, some like it but other may have reasons to consider another size.
      It's a great game, but the idea of making a slight change to one aspect of the game could be considered.
      I'm only stating a possible consideration to improve the quality of the game, possibly even speed up the game and the potential
      to increase rounds played and other aspects which generate revenue for the golf industry.  Who's to say it's perfect and why is it perfect?
      Maybe perfect to some, but maybe others would enjoy a change, maybe even the game needs a small change for the good of the game.  
    • I would add that modern day instruction is backed up by scientific fact and tools such as launch monitors and such giving validity to the instruction. One problem with that is, trackman for example, might indicate you need to make a small correction  to something like a degree or two. While this is true, executing is something altogether different given the minute amount of time in the golf swing. "Some" modern day instructors get very, very, defensive if questioned, often stating that old school instruction was wrong. The old school stuff might not be borne out by modern equipment, but none-the-less worked more than likely as a "feel" thing (real or imagined). It worked because it caused that person at the time to focus on the particular technique rather than the outcome. Gary Player for example is regarded (by some) as one of the best sand players of all time, yet some of his ideas would be scoffed today. His "strike the match" suggestion flies in the face of some of what is touted by modern day gurus. Another example would be Jack Nicklaus and his famous flying right elbow. His explanation was that it was easier to more or less "shoot from the top in a straight line". Others try it and it causes havoc, not because it does not work,but because there are a myriad of other problems in that person's swing. When I first started golfing some forty years ago, I was self taught, and had that flying elbow swing also. It worked pretty good for me at the time as I did not know any better. Since then my swing has evolved into something altogether different. One reason I sometimes quib "I wish I did not know now, what I did not know then". Nowadays should I come across some little thing that works, I "try" to keep it to myself as some sort of "secret discovery" for fear that it will be ridiculed by others.  Heck, Lee Trevino one time made the suggestion that for the amateur golfer, one of the best ways to get out of the sand was to hit the ball with a severe duck hook!   Tips are fine, but as stated, with caveats. YMMV.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries