Jump to content
IGNORED

Anchored Putters Rules Change (Effective January 1, 2016)


mvmac
Note: This thread is 2570 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

And there is no flintier rock or harder place than that. Nice post turtleback.

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Ernie is using the short putter this week, but will anchor again at Augusta National.

Quote:
"But even if I won here this week, I will use the belly putter at the Masters simply because the greens are so quick over there.

"But after the Masters, I'll try to use the short putter more regularly."

Remember he'd previously called it "cheating" and said he'd keep on cheating.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

Ernie is using the short putter this week, but will anchor again at Augusta National.

Remember he'd previously called it "cheating" and said he'd keep on cheating.

I'm reminded of the excuse many athletes use for their reasoning behind why they started using performance enhancing drugs.  "Everyone else is using it, and I knew it was wrong, but I needed to do the same in order to remain on a competitive level."

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm reminded of the excuse many athletes use for their reasoning behind why they started using performance enhancing drugs.  "Everyone else is using it, and I knew it was wrong, but I needed to do the same in order to remain on a competitive level."

Poor example. Anchoring is currently legal and will be until a decision comes down saying it isnt. Last I knew, illegal drugs were illegal.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by meenman

Poor example. Anchoring is currently legal and will be until a decision comes down saying it isnt. Last I knew, illegal drugs were illegal.

You have some serious moral issues if you think it's okay for a guy to say he thinks something is cheating and then go ahead and do it anyway.

His words...not mine.

Either he was lying about saying he thought it was cheating, or he's now cheating by using a long putter.  Pretty simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You have some serious moral issues if you think it's okay for a guy to say he thinks something is cheating and then go ahead and do it anyway. His words...not mine. Either he was lying about saying he thought it was cheating, or he's now cheating by using a long putter.  Pretty simple.

Moral issues? Just because he originally called it cheating does not make it fact, just like your uninformed opinion is far from fact. Bottom line, anchoring is legal and may possibly be illegal in 2016, until then, there is nothing wrong with a man admitting his own mistake, even if it was through action. If you have never changed your mind, then I guess you are just better than the rest of us.

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

Ernie is using the short putter this week, but will anchor again at Augusta National.

Remember he'd previously called it "cheating" and said he'd keep on cheating.

Originally Posted by meenman

Poor example. Anchoring is currently legal and will be until a decision comes down saying it isnt. Last I knew, illegal drugs were illegal.

Originally Posted by dave67az

You have some serious moral issues if you think it's okay for a guy to say he thinks something is cheating and then go ahead and do it anyway.

His words...not mine.

Either he was lying about saying he thought it was cheating, or he's now cheating by using a long putter.  Pretty simple.

Wait, time out.  I'm with Meenman on this one.

If I recall correctly Tiger Woods said a very similar thing in regards to them playing lift, clean and place during a tournament awhile back.  He called it "lift, clean and cheat."  Of course, he still did it, just like all of the rest of them.

Granted, I just teed it up for you guys to make all of the Tiger Woods/no morals jokes you want, but come on.  Just because a guy says that something is illegal that clearly is not doesn't mean he has no morals.  It just means he is wrong.

I can say right now that I think it's illegal to drink soda while driving.  It doesn't mean that if I go and do it later that all of a sudden I have no morals.  That's silly.

And, Dave, to your last point ... isn't he allowed a change of heart?  Have you never changed your mind about something?  He said it once and now he has to believe that forever?  Maybe he realized that he spoke out of turn when he said that.  And it's not against the rules now, so it's not cheating.  Pretty simple if you ask me.

[Edit:  Sorry was still writing while Meenman posted, didn't mean to repeat]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Wait, time out.  I'm with Meenman on this one.

If I recall correctly Tiger Woods said a very similar thing in regards to them playing lift, clean and place during a tournament awhile back.  He called it "lift, clean and cheat."  Of course, he still did it, just like all of the rest of them.

Granted, I just teed it up for you guys to make all of the Tiger Woods/no morals jokes you want, but come on.  Just because a guy says that something is illegal that clearly is not doesn't mean he has no morals.  It just means he is wrong.

I can say right now that I think it's illegal to drink soda while driving.  It doesn't mean that if I go and do it later that all of a sudden I have no morals.  That's silly.

And, Dave, to your last point ... isn't he allowed a change of heart?  Have you never changed your mind about something?  He said it once and now he has to believe that forever?  Maybe he realized that he spoke out of turn when he said that.  And it's not against the rules now, so it's not cheating.  Pretty simple if you ask me.

[Edit:  Sorry was still writing while Meenman posted, didn't mean to repeat]

Yes, Tiger did indeed do what EVERYONE did in order to level the playing field.  And to you that's the same as one guy saying something is "cheating" and then going out and doing it.

We'll have to agree to disagree on that one.

Let's look at the timeline here.  Ernie comes out and says he thinks it's cheating.  The R&A; comes out and says it's not a legal stroke.  The USGA analyzes their argument and agrees that it's not a legal stroke.  Ernie then states that he's going to anchor.

Does he still think it's cheating?  Maybe.  Maybe not.  Could he have changed his mind?  Sure.  Does that all of the sudden make it a legal stroke?  Nope.

You guys are focusing on this 2016 thing like it's an actual "stroke" now and will suddenly stop being a "stroke" then.  That is NOT the case.  The fact is, it's not a stroke NOW and according to the R&A; and USGA it has NEVER been an actual stroke, but ENFORCEMENT of it won't begin until 2016.  Just because they've said that enforcement won't go into effect until a few years from now doesn't mean that an anchored stroke is any more a stroke now than it will be then.  It just means that it won't be enforced until then.

There's a HUGE difference.  I'm surprised you guys don't see that.

I'm kind of baffled that they can say something isn't, by their definition, a "stroke" but continue to allow it until the next set of rules is published.  If they've interpreted "fairly struck" to mean the club can't be anchored to the body then I can't see a logical reason to wait a few years to actually act on that interpretation.  Anchored putters are going to have to adapt at some time, whether it's right now or 3 years from now.

Yes, I've changed my mind.  But hear this...if I was in the public spotlight as much as a pro athlete, and I called something "cheating", I can GUARANTEE you that I'd come out with some sort of statement before being so bold as to start doing the same thing I called "cheating".

I guess it goes back to the point I made on another thread...if you say you're going to do something, stick to it and follow through.  That's your responsibility.  If that little responsibility is a little too tough for you to handle, I feel sorry for the people around you in life who thought you were trustworthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by dave67az

There's a HUGE difference.  I'm surprised you guys don't see that.

Well, you're kind of failing to see the difference between someone having the opinion that something *should* be illegal, and *actually* being illegal. When someone refers to the anchored stroke (or lift/clean/place) as "cheating", obviously they mean they think it should be cheating, even though the rules don't define it that way. Since the rules allow it, it's clearly *not* cheating, and the people calling it so, as a figure of speech, know that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dave67az

I'm kind of baffled that they can say something isn't, by their definition, a "stroke" but continue to allow it until the next set of rules is published.

They can define things however they want. That's totally separate from saying whether what they've defined is illegal or not. In this case, they've defined anchoring now, and are going to change the rules to make it illegal later. I don't see why that would be baffling. (Especially because there are many good reasons for doing that.)

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Granted, I just teed it up for you guys to make all of the Tiger Woods/no morals jokes you want, but come on.  Just because a guy says that something is illegal that clearly is not doesn't mean he has no morals.  It just means he is wrong.

I can say right now that I think it's illegal to drink soda while driving.  It doesn't mean that if I go and do it later that all of a sudden I have no morals.  That's silly.

It may not mean you have NO morals, but it does mean you're willing to do something you feel is wrong because you feel justified in doing so based on some other rationale.  So, yes, Ernie is either justifying his "cheating" or he has decided it is no longer "cheating."  There is only one or the other.

This example resonates directly with me: I feel strongly that it is cheating and if you ever catch me doing it, I would be choosing to cheat based on some other justification (i.e., these greens are tough, or everybody else is doing it).

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by dave67az

I'm reminded of the excuse many athletes use for their reasoning behind why they started using performance enhancing drugs.  "Everyone else is using it, and I knew it was wrong, but I needed to do the same in order to remain on a competitive level."

Originally Posted by dave67az

Yes, Tiger did indeed do what EVERYONE did in order to level the playing field.  And to you that's the same as one guy saying something is "cheating" and then going out and doing it.

Whoa, whoa, whoa ... you have got to be kidding me Dave?  (I haven't even got past this line in your post - I will go read the rest of it - but I have to respond to this right now.

You wrote the top post less than an hour before you wrote the bottom one.  WTF???

And, specifically regarding the bold ... Yes, THEY ARE EXACTLY THE SAME.  You know why?  Because Tiger "said something was cheating and then went out and did it."

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by sacm3bill

Well, you're kind of failing to see the difference between someone having the opinion that something *should* be illegal, and *actually* being illegal. When someone refers to the anchored stroke (or lift/clean/place) as "cheating", obviously they mean they think it should be cheating, even though the rules don't define it that way. Since the rules allow it, it's clearly *not* cheating, and the people calling it so, as a figure of speech, know that.

They can define things however they want. That's totally separate from saying whether what they've defined is illegal or not. In this case, they've defined anchoring now, and are going to change the rules to make it illegal later. I don't see why that would be baffling. (Especially because there are many good reasons for doing that.)

So what you're telling me is that you don't see anything wrong with someone saying that they think something should be illegal and then going out and doing it anyway.

Again, if I had a change of heart and no longer thought it should be illegal, and if I was in the public eye as much as pro athletes, I'd be a little more concerned with how it would make me look.  But then again, you guys have made it pretty clear that you don't think it makes a person look bad to act against what they've said their personal beliefs are, so I'm not even sure it matter to you.

There has always been a rule that the ball must be fairly struck at, so it's not like it's a new rule.  They've made it clear that anchoring is NOT fairly striking at the ball.  Regardless of when they decide to enforce it, if you continue to do it then you're not fairly striking at the ball.  How is this not clear?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Whoa, whoa, whoa ... you have got to be kidding me Dave?  (I haven't even got past this line in your post - I will go read the rest of it - but I have to respond to this right now.

You wrote the top post less than an hour before you wrote the bottom one.  WTF???

And, specifically regarding the bold ... Yes, THEY ARE EXACTLY THE SAME.  You know why?  Because Tiger "said something was cheating and then went out and did it."

You're right, and I was wrong...they are exactly the same thing.  When I wrote it I was going to go into detail about how not everyone is using anchoring so Ernie can't use that excuse, but then decided not to.  In the end it came off sounding stupid and I agree with you...as stated they are exactly the same thing.  Someone saying one thing and then doing another.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by dave67az

You're right, and I was wrong...they are exactly the same thing.  When I wrote it I was going to go into detail about how not everyone is using anchoring so Ernie can't use that excuse, but then decided not to.  In the end it came off sounding stupid and I agree with you...as stated they are exactly the same thing.  Someone saying one thing and then doing another.

No worries, I've done that too. :)  I've said this before on another long thread (heck, it could have been this one too) ... if somebody wanted to take the time and go back, I'm sure they could find me contradicting myself a lot.

I guess the bottom line for me is that I kind of agree with sacm ... him saying it's cheating is more him admitting that he thinks it probably should be cheating.  There are a lot of situations where you can find a sort of loophole around a rule that is a grey area.  Tiger Woods (him again? ;)) getting a bunch of big guys in the crowd to help him move a 1/2 ton boulder out of the way of his shot several years back in Phoenix (I think) was perfectly within the rules.  But it did seem a little shady, especially when you consider the fact that it's quite possible that he's the only guy with enough fans out there to do it.  Some journeyman pro with 8 people in his gallery has to chip out sideways and lose a stroke.  Does that make what Tiger did 'cheating?'  Definitely not.  But I bet if you asked you could find a lot of guys (perhaps even Tiger himself) who might refer to it as such.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

From July 22, 2012.  It's things like this that make me lose respect for people.  On one hand you say that something is wrong, but then you try to rationalize it and go ahead and do it anyway.  I realize I'm in the minority here, but these things are important to me.  It's the foundation on which I've built my life, taught to me from the day I was born.

http://www.putterzone.com/2012/07/els-beat-cheat-competition.html

Did Ernie Els “cheat” his way to a British Open victory today?

Els, who was famously outspoken against the belly putter until he decided to use one himself , recently defended his switch by stating, “As long as it’s legal, I’ll keep cheating like the rest of them.”

Els once called for an outright ban on the belly putter, stating that anchoring the club to the body gives the golfer an unfair advantage. “Nerves and the skill of putting are part of the game,” he said.

But last year, with his putting woes mounting, Els made the switch to a belly putter.  He certainly gets points for honesty with his “cheating” comment. He didn’t pretend to have a change of heart. He just decided that if he couldn’t beat them, he’d join them. “Nothing should be anchored to your body, and I believe I still believe that,” he said. “I was in such a state that I felt that I needed to change something, which I did.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Golfingdad

No worries, I've done that too. :)  I've said this before on another long thread (heck, it could have been this one too) ... if somebody wanted to take the time and go back, I'm sure they could find me contradicting myself a lot.

I guess the bottom line for me is that I kind of agree with sacm ... him saying it's cheating is more him admitting that he thinks it probably should be cheating.  There are a lot of situations where you can find a sort of loophole around a rule that is a grey area.  Tiger Woods (him again? ;)) getting a bunch of big guys in the crowd to help him move a 1/2 ton boulder out of the way of his shot several years back in Phoenix (I think) was perfectly within the rules.  But it did seem a little shady, especially when you consider the fact that it's quite possible that he's the only guy with enough fans out there to do it.  Some journeyman pro with 8 people in his gallery has to chip out sideways and lose a stroke.  Does that make what Tiger did 'cheating?'  Definitely not.  But I bet if you asked you could find a lot of guys (perhaps even Tiger himself) who might refer to it as such.

But see, here's the problem.  If you truly believe something should be considered cheating, as Ernie stated (and Tiger in your example) exactly what thought process allows you to then go out and do it anyway?  I realize a certain notorious troll may label me as a "goodie two shoes" for actually acting out of conviction rather than rationalizing my convictions enough to allow me to do what everyone else is doing, even if I think it's wrong.   But unless I've led some sort of sheltered existence in the military (and maybe I have) where I just haven't been exposed to what most "real people" are truly like, surely the majority of people out there have a little more personal integrity than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by dave67az

From July 22, 2012.  It's things like this that make me lose respect for people.  On one hand you say that something is wrong, but then you try to rationalize it and go ahead and do it anyway.  I realize I'm in the minority here, but these things are important to me.  It's the foundation on which I've built my life, taught to me from the day I was born.

http://www.putterzone.com/2012/07/els-beat-cheat-competition.html

Did Ernie Els “cheat” his way to a British Open victory today?

Els, who was famously outspoken against the belly putter until he decided to use one himself, recently defended his switch by stating, “As long as it’s legal, I’ll keep cheating like the rest of them.”

Els once called for an outright ban on the belly putter, stating that anchoring the club to the body gives the golfer an unfair advantage. “Nerves and the skill of putting are part of the game,” he said.

But last year, with his putting woes mounting, Els made the switch to a belly putter.  He certainly gets points for honesty with his “cheating” comment. He didn’t pretend to have a change of heart. He just decided that if he couldn’t beat them, he’d join them. “Nothing should be anchored to your body, and I believe I still believe that,” he said. “I was in such a state that I felt that I needed to change something, which I did.”

I totally appreciate your opinion, but I still fail to see anything wrong with this.  Just because he feels that it should be illegal does not mean that he should be expected to play by a different set of rules as everybody else.

Here's another example:  I bet you could find managers of American League baseball teams out there that feel that the DH should not be allowed in baseball.  Does that mean that they should make their pitchers hit?  Of course not, that would be absurd.

I think we need tax reform.  Am I immoral for taking all of the breaks offered me until then?  Nope.

Or how about this ... Jack Nicklaus is one of many who strongly feels they need to roll back the ball to reign in distance.  When he golfs, if he's not using a balata from 1980, is he an immoral cheater?  Again, nope.

See where I am coming from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by dave67az

Quote:

Originally Posted by sacm3bill

Well, you're kind of failing to see the difference between someone having the opinion that something *should* be illegal, and *actually* being illegal. When someone refers to the anchored stroke (or lift/clean/place) as "cheating", obviously they mean they think it should be cheating, even though the rules don't define it that way. Since the rules allow it, it's clearly *not* cheating, and the people calling it so, as a figure of speech, know that.

They can define things however they want. That's totally separate from saying whether what they've defined is illegal or not. In this case, they've defined anchoring now, and are going to change the rules to make it illegal later. I don't see why that would be baffling. (Especially because there are many good reasons for doing that.)

So what you're telling me is that you don't see anything wrong with someone saying that they think something should be illegal and then going out and doing it anyway.

Yes. You have to understand we're talking about the rules of a game .  I may not think it should be legal for a rook to move an unlimited number of spaces, but that's the rule. It's pretty idiotic to say "I'm only going to move it like a pawn" in order to stick to some internal personal principle.

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 2570 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Loving the deal I made.
    • Day 590, June 15, 2024 Worked the same as yesterday (link here to my Member Swing topic) on the QuadMAX and the same pieces. Clubhead speed stayed around 93-95 most of the time (after five warmups in the 89-91 range).
    • Some updates after using the Titan Elite for three rounds. This will be a semi-random assortment of thoughts. Battery The Titan Elite still says it has a full charge, so I'm not worried about the battery at all. Though a CR-2 battery will seemingly last more than a full season, the documentation for most of these rechargeable batteries says they'll last about ten rounds with Bluetooth on, and 40+ with it off. Not quite the years I get from a CR-2, but… not so few that "range anxiety," errrr, "battery anxiety" is a real thing. Plus, more carts have USB chargers for phones these days, and the supplied USB-A to USB-C charger should charge in a cart. (I keep a pair of USB cords in my golf bag these days anyway.) Heft and Magnets Previously in reviewing the NX9 I remarked on little things like the feel or heft of the unit as well as the strength of the magnet. Neither are concerns with the Titan Elite: the aluminum body gives the TE a satisfying heft, and the magnet — beneath the Precision Pro logo on the left side of the rangefinder — gives a satisfying pull with good strength. The Precision Pro App I won't be reviewing the app's functionality beyond that which directly interacts with/affects the Titan Elite. You can use the app to keep score and do other things, but I'm going to talk about MySlope and the Bluetooth connection almost exclusively. Basic App Features Unlike some other apps that require your phone to stay pretty much loaded up at all times, the Precision Pro app can work in the background. To get into the app quickly, you'll find a notification present on your lock screen at almost all times. Tap it and you're back into the app. The app will do basic performance tracking, but it's limited. Here you can see I selected a Driver, and basically, you do this when you're standing on the tee and, when you arrive at your ball, you tap a button to end tracking and the distance of your tee shot will be noted in the app. It's basic, and may fulfill a need, but I won't ever really use it. Slope Both the Titan Elite and the app feature slope capabilities. In the rangefinder itself, it's as you expect: you switch a button on the top of the rangefinder, and the slope turns on or off. It works just as you'd expect, and is nice and accurate. I'll say more in the MySlope section later. A small quibble: I have found myself accidentally hitting the button and toggling slope on/off a few times when grabbing the Titan Elite from the cart (it has a great magnet to stick to the cart). Accidentally turning the slope on could cost an honest player strokes in an event, so I wish the slope switch was either tougher to toggle, in a different location, or ideally, both. Also, the state isn't super obvious, to you or any people you're playing with, while other rangefinders make the state more obvious. In the app, you can turn slope on to use GPS/map elevation data to tell you what the effective playing distances of shots are, as seen here: MySlope I've never really cared for slope in rangefinders because I've never been totally certain that the slope calculations were right for me. Though you probably could assume about a 45° landing angle (which makes the math pretty easy - one yard up or down would equate to one yard longer or shorter in distance, until you get to larger elevation changes), the Titan Elite pairs with the app to let you put in literal launch monitor stats (not just carry yardages) — ball speed, launch angle, and spin — to calculate a ball flight/trajectory to adapt to any type of situation. In testing, I don't have the largest of slopes at Whispering Woods, but the numbers have felt pretty spot on. I'll continue to test this, particularly at some courses around Pittsburgh, and will post should I notice anything more. If you don't have the launch monitor stats for all of your clubs, you can either estimate the ones in the gaps, or just leave them blank and the app will make estimates. They'll still likely be better than the standard guesses from other rangefinders. MySlope requires your TE to be connected to your phone to work, though I haven't sought clarity on whether it will continue to work once you've connected the device to your phone the first time or whether the Titan Elite reverts to a stock slope model. I've emailed and will let you know the answer. GPS The Titan Elite has two modes — laser rangefinder mode and… GPS mode. The GPS uses your phone (and the Precision Pro app) to give you front/center/back yardages. Toggling is as simple as tapping a button on the top of the Titan Elite. For example, you can see "147 playing 144" in the laser mode, then tap a button and see that the front/center/ back are 143 / 155 / 167. You have almost all of the information you need to hit a good shot to the fat side of the green. 😄  Of course, GPS mode requires that your phone be with you (and somewhat recently woken up, as I had a yardage for a hole three holes ago once when I hadn't used or awoken my phone in awhile). I prefer to play golf without my phone on me, so on days when you can park a cart nearby (a push cart or a driving cart), no sweat. But on cart path only days? You might get some odd numbers, and should rely only on the laser rangefinder mode. In other words, if you have your phone on your or very close nearby, this is a nice feature. Otherwise, you won't find yourself using it much. Perhaps a future version will have a GPS chip in the rangefinder itself, and can do a little calculating (even if the map is just sent to the rangefinder from the phone on each new hole or something). Find My Titan If your Titan Elite disconnects from the phone for more than two minutes, you'll get an alert. If your TE is still with you, you can dismiss this, otherwise, you're shown a map with a red dot where your Titan Elite was last connected to your phone. It's not true "Find My" because the Titan Elite doesn't have a GPS chip in it, doesn't connect to the phones of strangers, etc., but it's helpful to know when you last used your Titan Elite, and given the range of Bluetooth isn't too far, and two minutes isn't too long, you should have a pretty good idea where your TE was last "seen" by your phone. If you get close but can't find it, you can ping your TE and it will beep. Some Extra Photos The eyepiece, like every other rangefinder I've used for the past decade or so, is adjustable focus. The USB-C port for charging and the Bluetooth on/off switch: The case is not quite the same as the usual "latch the elastic over a post" type case, and I kinda like this variation a lot. The slope on/off switch is the one with the green showing (green = slope is on). The button with the two arcs on it is the mode switch button: pressing it will switch between laser range finding and GPS range finding.
    • Great to hear. I am looking forward to making a trip. Tough to find a day right now but hopefully soon
    • Get the feeling Bryson is going to pull this off and win his second US Open
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...