Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4818 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys,

Here are some notes about my golf experience:

  • I picked up golf in July of this year and have been using my brother's old irons: Titleist DTR's from the 80's
  • I've been very eager to learn and have put in 10+ hours per week of practice at the driving range consistently, along with an occasional lesson to make sure I'm on the right track
  • As of now, I'm hitting the 6 iron in the 140's, with the other irons appropriate distances around that mark
  • I've played about 6-7 rounds at a short par-3 course, where I averaged 36 and had a best of 33 (no mulligans or toe wedge)
  • My swing speed with an 8 iron was clocked in the mid 80's and was carrying about 125 yards
  • My teacher mentioned that I flip/cast the club, and said the result is a few mph lost from my swing translating into around 10-15 yards of distance lost
  • He said my clubs were a bit too long for me, so the head does not sit on the ground, which can cause a hook, and that my swing path is forced to flattened
  • He also mentioned that since my clubs are 20+ years old, a more modern club would have a bigger sweet spot and probably travel further.
  • I'm 30 years old, 5 feet 115 lbs, but athletic and in good shape.  Yes, I'm abnormally short.  I don't anticipate ever being a "long hitter", but from what I've read here, if I can get my 6 iron to go in the 160's then I would be very average in distance.  Eventually when I get a driver, I hope to hit in the 230-250 range.  I have a brother who is a few inches taller than me and he can crush the ball around 270 and shoots in the low 80's.

I've tested out some demo clubs and I did get some additional distance, but they were even longer shafts and the grips were too thick, so the accuracy was not quite there.  So far I've liked the Taylormade Burners; I forget which model but I was told they were a couple years old.  Also, the R11's were nice.  I tried out some Calloways that I didn't like.  Someone suggested the Taylormade Burner Plus, saying they were the more forgiving for a high handicapper.

I anticipate that I'll have another year or so of free time for extensive practice, but after that I'll likely stagnate.  My goal is to be able to hit in the 80's but I would probably be happy with low 90's, as long as my shots look good when I play with my boss.

Anyway, this message has way too much information to ask the basic question: what kind of effect can I expect from a newer, better club?  I'm hoping for more consistency and 20 yards.

Cheers


Posted

You would definitely benefit from being fitted for clubs. The "average" set of irons is made for someone between 5-foot-9 and maybe 6-foot-2, and people taller or shorter likely will need something outside the "average" specs.

(NOTE: There's no industry average for specs - it varies from club model to model and company to company. For example, I need a slightly flat lie for Ping irons, but the standard lie is fine for me with Callaway and Nike).

You likely would benefit most from a basic static fitting. This ensures that:

  • the clubs shafts are not too long or short for your height/arm length
  • you have the right lie angle. If the clubs are too long and rock back on the heel, you have too upright a lie, which causes you to hook
  • The grip thickness matches the size of your hands.

Also, by checking clubhead speed, the fitter can get some idea of what flex shaft you need. A good fitter can tweak all the above bullet items, or factory-order a set that fits you if needed..

Newer clubs have more efficient head design.

Note: Remember that the head is only half the club; a proper shaft (flex and length) is the other half.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How much effect? Kinda hard to play with out them...

New clubs are longer(distance-wise) because they now call a 6 iron a 7 iron. The only true measure of club's worth is your score at the end of the day, not how far you hit them. The problem with "strong clubs", comes with your wedges. Your new PW is really a 9 iron, so now you need a gap wedge to make up the difference and that can lead to shorting yourself in the number of effective wedges you can carry. Don't get caught up in the "longer is better" hype.

I got new CG16s and they are made the same...6 iron labeled a 7. I got them because I HIT THEM WELL, not because I "hit them longer"! And yes it did cause a problem with sorting out my wedges.

R11s driver

R11 3 wood

Glide sole design 5 wood

Cleveland CG16 irons

Vokey SM4 48*, Vokey SM4 52*, Vokey SM4 56* wedges

Yes! Eleanor putter


Posted

if you are spending that much time playing/practicing I don't see why you wouldn't get a good new/used set.  If you get fitted that is always good especially at your height.  Getting new clubs will give you confidence and also (should) remove all those thoughts in the back of your mind that it might be the clubs costing you some strokes/distance.

Like Willie Malay said you will probly see a distance increase because of stronger lofts.  If you can get on the path to releasing the club properly that will be the best way to improve both distance and consistency.


Posted

Thanks for the replies.

I did go in to get fitted for some irons and several people mentioned how much impact changing clubs will have since my current set is so old.  I think I am going to go with Taylormade Burner Plus.  When I was playing with them they were going about 20 yards further, and more consistent...which is what I was looking for.


Posted

Clubs fitted for you will be a lot better than random combo irons.  Obviously new technology clubs will benefit your game more than older clubs, but in the end it all comes down to your swing.

Titleist 913D2 9.5 (UST VTS 65)

Titleist 913F 15 (Diamana S+)

Titleist 913H 19 (Diamana S+)

Titleist 714 AP2 (4-PW) (DG XP-95)

Titleist Vokey SM5 (52,56,58) (DG XP-95)

Ping Anser 2 Classic


Posted
Originally Posted by Willie Malay

How much effect? Kinda hard to play with out them...

LOL ... that was my first thought when I saw the title of the thread as well.

Originally Posted by Willie Malay

New clubs are longer(distance-wise) because they now call a 6 iron a 7 iron. The only true measure of club's worth is your score at the end of the day, not how far you hit them. The problem with "strong clubs", comes with your wedges. Your new PW is really a 9 iron, so now you need a gap wedge to make up the difference and that can lead to shorting yourself in the number of effective wedges you can carry. Don't get caught up in the "longer is better" hype.

I got new CG16s and they are made the same...6 iron labeled a 7. I got them because I HIT THEM WELL, not because I "hit them longer"! And yes it did cause a problem with sorting out my wedges.

Two thoughts here ...

1.  I don't think it's quite as simple as saying you're calling your old 6 iron a 7 iron now.  It's definitely true that the clubs all have stronger lofts but it's not totally the manufacturers playing marketing games.  More perimeter weight, and a lower CG, with traditional lofts, and then your ball is just going to be going straight up in the air.  I think that is why blades still have traditional lofts.

2.  In spite of what I just said, the bottom line, like you said, is that the stronger clubs cause the ball to go further.  Therefore the wedge problem you mentioned isn't really a big deal because even though you may have to add a gap at the bottom, you can take out the 3 iron because it's going as far as your hybrid or 5 wood.  That's what happened to me.  I upgraded from 3-PW (47*), 56*,60* to 4-PW (45.5), UW (50), SW (54.5), LW (59)  The 4 iron goes as far as the old 3 so there really wasn't a problem,

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
80mph 8 iron is pretty fast. That should be going about 165 at that speed if hit cleanly I think. So for that reason alone, you need new clubs. I just got new clubs for the first time. Distances and ball flight are similar to my old clubs. The only thing that really changed is that I seem to strike the ball much better and more consistently with the new clubs. That's it for me on the pros of getting new clubs, but confidence is 75% of the game, so I would say for me, it was worth it.

Note: This thread is 4818 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.