Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4699 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I was recently in the market for new golf shoes and was wondering if anyone has used the new Cleats that are permanent, not replaceable. They start around $100, wondering if they are as stable as the traditional styles and how they hold up with a full swing, in the sand, etc. thanks

Posted

I have the Oakley Ripcords, which aren't replaceable.  They grip OK, but I do notice that they're wearing much faster than I would like.

My playing partner has Eccos and they seem to grip much better, and they definitely wear better.  His hardly show any signs of wear, where mine are going to have to be replaced soon.  Of course, the Eccos cost nearly double the Oakleys, so I would expect them to last a lot longer.


Posted
A lot of guys here like the True Golf shoes, they have non replaceable nubs. I think they are fugly as sin, but i have heard nothing but good things from the guys here.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Bullit, Do you only wear them to golf or everywhere, I guess that's the whole idea so you don't have to change your shoes? And also how many rounds b4 you have to replace.

Posted

I wear them to and from the course only, along with a stop on the way home to pick up a drink/get gas/food.  The spikes (more like nubs) are very soft on the Oakleys as well.  They're as soft as the rubber on the old school style foam and rubber soles of tennis shoes.  I've probably walked at least 50 rounds, maybe more in them.  While the Oakleys are super light and comfortable, I probably won't buy another set after seeing how much better the Eccos hold up over approximately the same number of rounds, and more off-course use than mine.  He's even worn them to work quite a few times when we are planning on getting a couple holes in during lunch or hitting the range.


Posted

I snapped a couple of pictures of the soles to show the wear.  While taking the pictures, I also noticed that the rubber soles are starting to separate from the foam.  I also didn't realized they were worn as much as they actually are.  I have worn through the heel and into the foam like we used to do with our old tennis shoes.  They've officially made it through a single busy golf season, and will have to be replaced now.  They are definitely comfortable, but in this case, comfort does now come with durability.

And yes, they're dirty......... lol


Posted
Originally Posted by Bullitt5339

I snapped a couple of pictures of the soles to show the wear.  While taking the pictures, I also noticed that the rubber soles are starting to separate from the foam.  I also didn't realized they were worn as much as they actually are.  I have worn through the heel and into the foam like we used to do with our old tennis shoes.  They've officially made it through a single busy golf season, and will have to be replaced now.  They are definitely comfortable, but in this case, comfort does now come with durability.

And yes, they're dirty......... lol

Mmmmm, oatmeal and onions, sounds delicious!!

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Oatmeal Creme Pies..........  My nemesis actually.

I'd better not pull up those pictures when my wife is home, she'd freak if she saw that I moved the stuff on the island around to put a pair of shoes up there.


Posted
Thanks for the pics, that's funny something I would do. I have a pair of Nike shoes and foot joy, I play about 20-30 rounds a year and I replace my cleats in the beginning and mid season. I'd like to give these a try, I will def look into the eccos, thanks

Note: This thread is 4699 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.