Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4675 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Cleveland has a series of drivers, the Launcher, that vary by weight.  Which weight would be best for a bogey golfer with a fairly slow swingspeed?  I use a regular flex shaft and my current average reasonable solid drive is in the 200-215 range.  I recently got the Cleveland Mashie 3W and 5W and I really like them and hit them pretty far (compared to my old 3&5 woods), and I think the reason is the Miyazaki shaft, so I am thinking of upgrading my driver to one with the same shaft.  All of the Launchers use that shaft and it seems as if the lighter version of the club would be better for my swingspeed, or lack of swing speed, but I don't know if that reasoning is sound.  Does 20 grams of total weight, between the 270 and the 290 really make that much of a difference?

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You're talking about the Launcher Ultralites (circa 2010) in 270, 290 and 310 grams total weight.

Lightweight shafts and lightweight clubs have limits on their benefits. Golf Digest suggested recently if the club is too light - total weight or swingweight - the average golfer has trouble feeling it near the top, and trouble dropping it into the slot. Supposedly, it takes an excellent ballstriker to really maximize the superlight clubs.

Last year I tried the 2012 Cleveland Classic 270 and 290 drivers, and got better feel and performance out of the R-flex 290. I have about 85 MPH swing speed, not terribly fast. (Also, the Classic 290 clearly outperformed the original RBZ driver).

I ended up getting a Callaway RazrFit driver (about 310 grams), which allowed me to make useful adjustments as my swing developed.

IF you could, try out both Launchers and Classics on the launch monitor, and use shot dispersion and feel to help make your choice for best total weight.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Typically, a lighter club with a 45 inch length and a decent swing weight will assist the distance challenged, lower speed golfer.

I've used a higher swing weight driver - I think Taylormade once made a D6 driver as standard. I found it too heavy at the end of the club.

But I would look for a driver that is 45 inches, a 196-200g head, a 55g shaft, and a D3 swingweight (so you can feel the head during the swing and not get too quick).

But if you're going for the Cleveland, do what WU Tiger suggested, and get on a launch monitor with the two drivers of different weights and see what happens.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I just went for a driver fitting. They measured my swing weight of my old Titleist 910 D2 at E1. I put about 5 pieces of high density lead tape near the hosel to help close the club face when I try and draw the ball.

When I bought my 913, I measured the tape on the 910 and put it in the same pattern on my new club. I've loaded all my clubs up with lead take increasing swing weight by 2-3 points on my irons.

I would love to get my wedges measures. They are covered in tape making them feel like hammers.

D:      Titleist 913 D2 (10.5, Stiff, Diamana D+ 62 / Tipped 1/2 inch)

F:      TaylorMade RBZ (15.0, 43 inches & 19.0, 42 inches, Fujikura Rombax Type-X, 75S)

H:      Adams A12 (21 degree, 40 inches, Diamana HY92, Stiff)

I:        Mizuno JPX 800 Pro 5-PW (KBS Tour, X-Flex, Soft Stepped 1x)

GW:   Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 50 (KBS Tour, X-Flex, non-conforming)

SW    Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 56 (bent one degree strong, KBS Tour, Stiff, non-conforming)

LW:    Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 60 (non-conforming, stock shaft)

P1:     Scotty Cameron California Coranado


Note: This thread is 4675 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.