Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6675 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am a 17 handicapper and have been playing for two years now. I am considering purchasing a good set of irons in the next year or so. I have heard great things about Callaway and have hit both the X-20s and the Big Berthas. Are the X-20s designed for someone of my experience level, or should I stick with the Big Berthas? Does anyone have any other suggestions for irons?

In my C-130 bag:

Driver: G10 10.5*
3 Wood: Burner
Irons: G10 steel AWT shafts, silver dot, +1" (3-SW)Wedge: cg12 58*Putters: Squareback 2, California Coronado Low score (18 holes): 90Low score (9 holes): 42


Posted
Definitely the Big Bertha's. The X-20's are good, but the feel of the Big Bertha's is unmatched for a higher handicapper.
WITB

Driver - Taylormade r7 Quad 10.5˚ Fujijura E360 Stiff
Woods - Sonartec SS 2.5 13˚ HST Penley Tour Stiff
Hybrid - Sonartec HB-001 19˚ HST Penley Tour StiffIrons - Mizuno MP-67 Forged 4-PW, DGS300Wedges - Callaway Forged 50˚ and 54˚, Walter Hagen 60˚Putter - Nike T130 O/S Mallet Ctr Shaft 33"B...

Posted
Whoa diagree big time, x-20's are amazing irons, also the best thing is that they'll grow on you. x-20's were voted best game improvement irons for a reason, performance. But hit both and make the descision there.

Posted
You are definetly experienced enough to hit the X-20's. I recently bought them, these irons can help anyone shave strokes off there game. I just shot in the low 80's 4 times in the last two weeks and I'm realizing these irons have alot to do with low scores. Golf Digest rated them the best game improvement iron out there. Make sure you get fitted and I guarantee you'll love them.

Posted
I would hit both of them and see what you like better. But then it sounds like you haven't hit anything new recently, so why limit yourself to just Callaway? Hit everything your nearest golf store or pro shop has! You aren't going to be buying new irons every year. I think you owe it to yourself to check out everything. Plus, it is a blast to do.

In no way am I talking bad about Callaway either. I just purchased a new set of X-20 Tours.
"The most likely way for the world to be destroyed, most experts agree , is by accident. That's where we come in; we're computer professionals. We cause accidents"

-Nathaniel Bornenstein

Posted
Whoa diagree big time, x-20's are amazing irons, also the best thing is that they'll grow on you. x-20's were voted best game improvement irons for a reason, performance. But hit both and make the descision there.

I never said they were bad, but feel makes a difference. It's all up to the player.

WITB

Driver - Taylormade r7 Quad 10.5˚ Fujijura E360 Stiff
Woods - Sonartec SS 2.5 13˚ HST Penley Tour Stiff
Hybrid - Sonartec HB-001 19˚ HST Penley Tour StiffIrons - Mizuno MP-67 Forged 4-PW, DGS300Wedges - Callaway Forged 50˚ and 54˚, Walter Hagen 60˚Putter - Nike T130 O/S Mallet Ctr Shaft 33"B...

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted
I just recently bought a used set of '04 berthas. They helped my game immediately. They are great clubs for hackers such as myself. They make it so that you don't have to have a perfect swing. I don't plan on taking lessons or trying to be too serious about the game. These clubs serve the purpose of allowing me to play the game. I had an older set of DCI's and I simply could not hit the ball straight.

Posted
I would say x-20 irons. Reason being that the big berthas are designed for the higher handicapper (around 19+) but I think the x-20s are designed for mid handicappers. If you want to buy them cheaply, buy them off of ebay in the winter. I did and got a set of basically new 2006 big bertha irons for £190 + £20 postage. It was a good deal.

Posted
As a 17 handicap, (improving?) peference and style of play is the issue. If you want maximum height, don't try to work the ball, and don't mind the wide sole on short irons go Big Bertha. If you are trying to learn to work the ball or hit many knockdowns, or don't like wide soles in your short irons go with X-20s. I do agree x-20s are aimed at slightly better or at least younger golfers. My experience was that the middle irons on berthas were great but the short irons tended to balloon. I liked the short irons and wedges on the X-20s better. I think this version of x's kind of blurs the line between the clubs. I actually prefer the x-18s.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Note: This thread is 6675 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.