Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4516 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just started golf with a knight tour 525 golf club set that I got at a garage sale. Im really into golf and plan on getting new clubs. The clubs im looking at our the Callaway Strata Set. Are these any good. Should I buy this set or just individual clubs. Thanks


Posted
Originally Posted by Deadeye32

Also would my scores improve if I had $1000 Set compared to a $100 Set

Clubs are not a magic bullet that will fix a bad swing (not even the best clubs money can buy).

That said, it is easier to hit the ball with less effort and unwanted corrections during the swing with clubs that fit than with clubs that don't fit.

Clubs that fit have little to do with what they cost. Things like the lie angles, shaft lengths, and MOI can be altered to fit better by a fitter that knows what they are doing in most cases.

Club manufacturers are in the business of selling clubs and convincing people that they will play better with their latest designs. They keep lowering the lofts so people will think they are hitting the ball further than with their old clubs. They don't usually mention that the new 7 iron you are hitting is the same loft as your old 5 iron.


Posted

So if I had a 100 set and a 1000 set with the correct lie angle and loft angle and were fitted to me, the performance wouldn't really be that different between the two


Posted
Originally Posted by Deadeye32

So if I had a 100 set and a 1000 set with the correct lie angle and loft angle and were fitted to me, the performance wouldn't really be that different between the two

If you're a beginning player, your swing probably isn't consistent enough for loft and lie angles to have much significance in game improvement. Also, keep in mind the general rule of golf equipment prices: the more expensive a given item is, the more that item has been designed for the serious (low-handicap) player. $1,000 iron sets are not made for golfers just starting out. Practice and experience will make you a better player right now, not expensive clubs.

An out-of-the-box starter set is all you need right now. If you feel you need to buy new clubs, start with two wedges: most "complete" beginner's sets end at pitching wedge, so you do need sand and lob wedges to complete your bag. In time, you can replace the set with better clubs as you go along: start with the putter, then the driver, then the fairway woods and hybrids, and finally the irons.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted
Originally Posted by Deadeye32

So if I had a 100 set and a 1000 set with the correct lie angle and loft angle and were fitted to me, the performance wouldn't really be that different between the two

I haven't played with a $100 set of clubs and there is a point where the quality becomes crap. It's not hard to find some high quality used clubs in the $400 to $600 range. If they fit they work every bit as well as new ones.

There are also brands that don't spend the sponsor dollars on the Tour players that cost much less but are just as good.


Posted

Why dont you shop a second hand site or hit up craigslist.

You can get a decent second hand driver and wood for 50 bucks each at some sites. I paid roughly 30 bucks a piece for a cobra driver s9-1f which isnt bad and a matching 3 wood.

if you dont mind mixing and matching brands, itll be easy to put something together

get these irons from ebay. i dont know what others think about them but i think they are playable for the price 3-sw macgregor battlesticks (89 bucks new) you could probably find them cheaper used.

say you pay:

driver: 50

3 wood: 50

battlesticks 3-sw: 89

youre looking at 189.00 minus shipping and a putter and a bag for a near complete beginner set - cheaper if you get those irons used - its roughly around the same price as those stratas 13 set and not the 18 which is closer to 300 i think..

However your driver and wood will be better.  having personally played with those battlesticks myself, i like em - pretty dependable.  you could also modify and get 3/4 hybrids etc... i guess it really depends on how you want to build your set and how you play.

oh and i havent played stratas so i dont know. i know id be replacing that putter asap for sure


Posted

furthermore after reviewing those particular irons on ebay -

i played battlesticks with graphite shafts and better grips.. those are steels


Posted

If you want something nice, and have just a little bit more money, you can Google the name of the company you like followed by "pre-owned golf clubs" and you will find sites that have very good clubs at good prices.

My son bought some high end clubs from one of those sites this year and I couldn't tell they were even used.


Note: This thread is 4516 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.