Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

PGA and Preferred Lies (fluffing)


Note: This thread is 4507 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Several PGA events this year had a day or more of Preferred Lies.

Really, these players are the best of the best... is it too much to ask them to play under current course conditions (unless lightning causes safety concerns)?

It rains on the course I play, the wind blows, snow happens. I have never quit a round, or asked for "Preferred lies" because of weather. Golf is an outdoor game, weather is a player one must contend with. No clean and place except on the putting surface or in the case of an embedded ball (fairway only). Casual water means nothing unless it is flowing enough to move the ball.

Pros should play the ball as it lies! If conditions become hazardous to the safety of the player, play should be suspended till the safety concern is ended. Play should resume at that time regardless of rain, wind, sun, eclipse, solar flare, planetary alignment or course condition.

Play the ball as it lies pampered pros!

Craig

:wilsonstaff: - FG Tour F5
:wilsonstaff: - Fybrid 3W 15*, FY 19.5*, 4H 24*
:wilsonstaff: - FG 51 Tour Blade 4-9
:wilson: - Harmonized 50, 55, 60
Old Master - TZ Putter


Posted

Not sure who would benefit by asking the pros to play with clumps of mud on the ball.

Is that what TV audiences want to see?

Do you think it makes them less manly or something?

What would be the point of not having preferred lies? Or lift, clean and place?

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
Originally Posted by Shorty

Not sure who would benefit by asking the pros to play with clumps of mud on the ball.

Is that what TV audiences want to see?

Do you think it makes them less manly or something?

What would be the point of not having preferred lies? Or lift, clean and place?

They'd actually be playing golf.  The preferred lies local rule is severely abused (or overused, if you prefer) by the PGA Tour.  It was never intended to be applied just because the ball occasionally picks up a bit of mud.  That is part of the game.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The point would be that weather is part of the game. Course conditions change as the weather changes.

Why should professionals expect free relief from course changes caused by environmental conditions?

Or perhaps the tour should play in air conditioned domed super stadiums on padded astro turf?

Craig

:wilsonstaff: - FG Tour F5
:wilsonstaff: - Fybrid 3W 15*, FY 19.5*, 4H 24*
:wilsonstaff: - FG 51 Tour Blade 4-9
:wilson: - Harmonized 50, 55, 60
Old Master - TZ Putter


Posted
why not have them putt from just off the green as well if a sprinkler head is in their line? or eliminate ground under repair and have them play from there too. the pga tour rarely grants lift clean and place. the golf course needs to be fair and when weather takes its toll on the ground they play off of relief should be granted. you also suggested they should have to play from a puddle because the course doesnt drain properly? seriously?

Callaway XR 9.5 + 1, Taylormade R15 3 Wood, Burner 3 Rescue, Callaway XHot 5H, Warbird 4H, Nike Vapor Fly 6-AW Irons, Titleist Vokey 54, 60 Wedges, Taylormade Rossa Fontana Putter, Srixon Z-Star Tour Yellow.

Best Score 2017:  82 (Traditions at the Glen, Par 70)

Favorite Course - Conklin Players Club (Par 72) - Best Score 86


Posted
Originally Posted by Chris223

... the golf course needs to be fair and when weather takes its toll on the ground they play off of relief should be granted. you also suggested they should have to play from a puddle because the course doesnt drain properly? seriously?

Your first 2 objections are specious.

Weather is fair, it rains on the righteous as well as the wicked.

Who was it that hit the ball into the puddle? Should that person be responsible for where the ball rests?

Craig

:wilsonstaff: - FG Tour F5
:wilsonstaff: - Fybrid 3W 15*, FY 19.5*, 4H 24*
:wilsonstaff: - FG 51 Tour Blade 4-9
:wilson: - Harmonized 50, 55, 60
Old Master - TZ Putter


Posted
when that puddle is in the middle of the fairway?

Callaway XR 9.5 + 1, Taylormade R15 3 Wood, Burner 3 Rescue, Callaway XHot 5H, Warbird 4H, Nike Vapor Fly 6-AW Irons, Titleist Vokey 54, 60 Wedges, Taylormade Rossa Fontana Putter, Srixon Z-Star Tour Yellow.

Best Score 2017:  82 (Traditions at the Glen, Par 70)

Favorite Course - Conklin Players Club (Par 72) - Best Score 86


Posted
Originally Posted by Chris223

when that puddle is in the middle of the fairway?

That's called casual water.  There is already a rule for that, Rule 25-1.  And if the ball embeds, then it's 25-2 or 25-1, depending on whether casual water exists around the embedded ball.  No need for an overly generous local rule when the situation is already covered.  These guys are the self-proclaimed best, so let's see them prove it.  Every time conditions are less than perfect, all they do is bitch.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Fourputt

That's called casual water.  There is already a rule for that, Rule 25-1.  And if the ball embeds, then it's 25-2 or 25-1, depending on whether casual water exists around the embedded ball.  No need for an overly generous local rule when the situation is already covered.  These guys are the self-proclaimed best, so let's see them prove it.  Every time conditions are less than perfect, all they do is bitch.


It might speed up the play also:

Breaking; Play suspended at the Deutsche due to players playing so slow they have stopped. Remarkable.


Posted
Originally Posted by Fourputt .  These guys are the self-proclaimed best, so let's see them prove it.

I don't think they are "self-proclaimed" as the best.  They are the best.

My equipment:

Driver - Callaway FT3 Fusion (9 degree)
3 Wood - Orlimar Tri-Metal (9 degree)
Hybrids - Bobby Jones (17, 21 & 25 degree)

Irons - KZG XCB 5 - PW

Wedges - Warrior (52 & 56 degree)

Putter - STX Envision

Ball of choice - Callaway TOUR i(s)


Posted
Originally Posted by vct33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fourputt .  These guys are the self-proclaimed best, so let's see them prove it.

I don't think they are "self-proclaimed" as the best.  They are the best.

PGA Tour TV ads all say "These guys are good."  Sounds like self promotion to me.

I'm not arguing that they don't have the talent.  They are good, but I want to see it displayed under all conditions, not just when everything is perfect.  Part of the game is dealing with adversity, so let them just play golf and quit fluffing lies.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Fourputt

I'm not arguing that they don't have the talent.  They are good, but I want to see it displayed under all conditions, not just when everything is perfect.  Part of the game is dealing with adversity, so let them just play golf and quit fluffing lies.

The committee is allowed to put that rule into place, and they do so because they're told to do so by the PGA Tour, which is a player-run organization, and the players feel that it's "fairest" to do that.

You might not like it (obviously), but it's all perfectly within the rules, even if you feel it's stretching them a bit.

Additionally, 99.9% of the golf world can put their ball on a tee for every shot they want and get six throws per round and still not beat the PGA Tour players. They are the best, and prove it time and time and time and time and time again. You sound silly with the "self-proclaimed" stuff.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think the point he's trying to make is why do they get exceptions that the ordinary golfer doesn't.  Other than when winter rules are in effect I've never seen improved lies allowed locally.  As stated earlier, casual water and embedded balls are already covered by rules.  If I get an occasional mud ball I have to play it.....my course isn't going to change it for a wet day.  Just this spring my dad tried to pull a stunt of claiming "lift, clean and place" on holes that were deemed cartpath only due to excess rain.  We later checked with the pro for our own knowledge and the pro just laughed and said no.   I remember a few years ago watching an LPGA event on TV where they were allowed relief from thin lies because the course was burned out in a few areas.....Lord forbid they have to hit off dirt like the rest of us.

  • Upvote 2

Posted
Originally Posted by CR McDivot

Several PGA events this year had a day or more of Preferred Lies.

Really, these players are the best of the best... is it too much to ask them to play under current course conditions (unless lightning causes safety concerns)?

It rains on the course I play, the wind blows, snow happens. I have never quit a round, or asked for "Preferred lies" because of weather. Golf is an outdoor game, weather is a player one must contend with. No clean and place except on the putting surface or in the case of an embedded ball (fairway only). Casual water means nothing unless it is flowing enough to move the ball.

Pros should play the ball as it lies! If conditions become hazardous to the safety of the player, play should be suspended till the safety concern is ended. Play should resume at that time regardless of rain, wind, sun, eclipse, solar flare, planetary alignment or course condition.

Play the ball as it lies pampered pros!

Agree with everything you said except the highlighted sentence - don't think we should be required to soak ourselves & ruin our clothing with muddy water having to hit a full shot out of a puddle ...

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by flintcreek6412

I think the point he's trying to make is why do they get exceptions that the ordinary golfer doesn't.  Other than when winter rules are in effect I've never seen improved lies allowed locally.  As stated earlier, casual water and embedded balls are already covered by rules.  If I get an occasional mud ball I have to play it.....my course isn't going to change it for a wet day.  Just this spring my dad tried to pull a stunt of claiming "lift, clean and place" on holes that were deemed cartpath only due to excess rain.  We later checked with the pro for our own knowledge and the pro just laughed and said no.   I remember a few years ago watching an LPGA event on TV where they were allowed relief from thin lies because the course was burned out in a few areas.....Lord forbid they have to hit off dirt like the rest of us.

Yep, that all I was saying.  Let them play golf without the pampering.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The pros are playing a different golf than you and I are, totally different. that said the clean and place is necessary at times, I'm fine with it because everyone has the same advantage. and its special occasion only when mother nature comes into play.

what I don't care for is during the practice round at say the open championship, they'll practice their shots from the drop zones near the bleachers on certain holes and pin locations. During the live rounds they will intentionally hit their ball into the bleachers, no loss of stroke and get to play from....you guessed it the drop zone. This no stroke penalty is a relatively new rule that got slid thru without a lot of public attention, meanwhile anchoring and grooves become an issue we all deal with.

I wish we had bleachers and TV towers at my club!


Posted

The pros are playing a different golf than you and I are, totally different. that said the clean and place is necessary at times, I'm fine with it because everyone has the same advantage. and its special occasion only when mother nature comes into play.

what I don't care for is during the practice round at say the open championship, they'll practice their shots from the drop zones near the bleachers on certain holes and pin locations. During the live rounds they will intentionally hit their ball into the bleachers, no loss of stroke and get to play from....you guessed it the drop zone. This no stroke penalty is a relatively new rule that got slid thru without a lot of public attention, meanwhile anchoring and grooves become an issue we all deal with.

I wish we had bleachers and TV towers at my club!

How are temporary immovable obstructions new?  They've been around for at least 50 years.  I'm not sure just when the local rule governing them was put into words in the rule book, but that's been there for along time too.  Nothing got "slid through".

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How are temporary immovable obstructions new?  They've been around for at least 50 years.  I'm not sure just when the local rule governing them was put into words in the rule book, but that's been there for along time too.  Nothing got "slid through".

The drop zones are new, the drop zone(s) remain in place for the entire tourney. No matter which bleacher. Prior to that the players had to take drop, no closer to the hole etc, just like you an I, often not in the most desirable area.

About 2years +,one commentator spoke at length how much this changes playing a hole than before. My reference to "slid through" was not the immovable object but where the ball ultimately could be played-drop zones, my mistake for the confusion.


Note: This thread is 4507 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.