Jump to content
IGNORED

Player Claims Identical Marking/Ball


bkuehn1952
Note: This thread is 3844 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rulesman

How could it be unique if all the other balls in his bag had the same mark

However, as I said before, the committee would have to make a decision on the opponent's claim based on all the evidence.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignorant

What's the difference? The fact that they were arguing, disagreeing, having a different point of view or just did not know what they were supposed to do?

In both scenarios the players could not identify their own ball.

No, in one of the scenarios players are fighting over the ownership of a ball.  As far as the players are concerned they HAVE identified their ball.  The committee MAY be able to resolve the dispute......determine if one player actually has identified their ball. See Rulesman's post above.  If not, then yes the ruling would be 2 lost balls.

In the other example, because there was no disagreement, there was nothing for the committee to decide.  Neither player knew which ball was his.

It gets too complicated when we have two discussions going on at once in the same thread.

Scenario one:

The original situation from the first post had only one ball in question, but with 2 players claiming ownership.  For Player A, it was only an abandoned provisional ball, so it wouldn't even affect his score.  That player was virtually certain that the fellow competitor's ball hit a tree in the fairway and would be found well back of where the the dispute was taking place.  Player B refused to even consider that or to look for another ball.  Player A also had evidence of a consistency of putting his identifying mark on his balls because he had several others to in his bag for proof.  Player B did not offer any such evidence, only his word.  The mark in question was not just a simple dot as is commonly used, but was a large red splotch which it is unlikely that two random players would both use.  If I was adjudicating this dispute, I'd have strongly suggested that we all go back and search for Player B's ball where Player A said it should be.  Any further ruling would be delayed until that was done.

Scenario 2:

This is more straightforward, with 2 players and 2 balls, both marked the same, and neither player able to prove which is which.  The rules are very clear on this the baoth ball are lost and both players return to the previous spot under stroke and distance.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3844 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...