Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4476 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Years ago when I was a member at a course my best round was a 74. Shot 32-42. Quit playing for many years and just got back to playing about 6 months ago. Recently started playing on the Golfweek Amateur Tour to fill a competitive gap and shot what I consider my best round ever. Ironically it was also a 74 (36-38) but to do it in a tournament meant that much more to me.

:nike:Covert Tour 9.5*,  :nike:Covert Tour 3 wood,  :nike:Covert Tour 5 wood, :callaway: Razr X Tour 3-Aw,   CG14 56*, :tmade:Ghost Spider S Slant,  :nike:One Rzn,  SGXw, :bushnell: V6


Posted

On 8/27/10 at my home course I had bogey on 1..birdie on 9...and 16 pars for an even par 72. Funny thing is..I hit the ball much better now but havent managed to score lower than 74 since then.

9032LS  Driver Speedline Fast 10 3w  2009 TP  3-PW

Tour Action 588 60* and 56*  Reg 588 50*  Classic #1 Black  Gamer V2


Posted

67 on a Par 72 course, that was only 5900 yards, and i hit the ball a long way so i kind of take that round with a grain of salt.  I didn't even putt that well, every birdie i had was literally within 3 feet cause I almost drove 2 different par 4s (only about 310 and 320 yards) and then absolutely murdered the "par 5's" (one was less than 500 yards and extremely down hill).

Age:19

What's in my bag?
Driver- Taylormade TP Burner 2.0 5 wood- Launcher (4-GW)- Jpx Pro 800 SW- X Forged LW- 588 X Wedge- Tp-Z Putter- Unitized Tiempo

 

"Hard work beats talent"-Tim Tebow


Posted

I've had lower rounds on easier courses but my best round was a 76 from the tips at Capstone Golf Club. Course rating 75.1.

My best ever part of a round (hahaha) was a day in the winter and only had time for 8 holes and had to use the lights on my cart to make the last putt. Had 7 birdies and 1 par in those 8 holes. That was 4 years ago and I have been waiting for that magic to return ever since.

(Still waiting).


Posted

72 on a 18 hole par 72 a week ago .... real score, but it was on a simulator! ;-) I was still thrilled!


Posted

Best 9 hole: 34

Best 18 hole: 71

Favorite 18 hole score: 75 highlighted by an eagle on the 430 yard par 4 10th - played from the tips @ 7,200 yard, (M-75.0/142)  Bear Creek in Murrieta.

          VR-S Covert
taylormade.gif Burner 3 wood
taylormade.gif 3-AW

56*
cleveland.gif CG14 60*
Laguna 2


Posted

I had a 75 on a local muni, but I don't count that.

77 on a legit, big boy golf course.

Bill M

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My lowest round is 64 on a par 72, it was during the first round of my PAT, I was scratch at the time.

Callaway Razr Fit Xtreme Matrix Ozik 7M3

Callaway X Hot Pro Mayrix Ozik 8M3

Callaway X Hot Pro 18* Matrix Ozik HM2

Callaway X Forged 2013 3-PW Project X PXi

Callaway Forged 52* & 58* Project X PXi

Odyssey Versa #9

Callaway HEX Black Tour


Posted
Originally Posted by phan52

I had a 75 on a local muni, but I don't count that.

77 on a legit, big boy golf course.

I love it when someone makes this sort of claim, as if city ownership somehow negates any possibility that a course might be worth the bother.

Here's a muni for you:  Par 72, 7705 yards - rating 75.8, slope 135

Here's another:  three 9's, each is par 36.  The shortest combination is a bit over 7100 yards, the other 2 are about 7300. The three combos are:

Rating/slope

73.9/147

73.9/146

72.8/146

Both of the above layouts are Nicklaus designs, and both are city owned and operated, one in Colorado and the other in Montana.

Just north of Denver is a Dye designed muni too: Par 72, 7067 yards - 73.3/134

Another just minutes west of Denver is yet another really nice city course;  Par 72,  at 6831 yards the shortest one I've listed, but still with a 72.5 rating and 139 slope.

Dismissing a municipal course out of hand can be quite shortsighted.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The round I am most proud of is scoring an EVEN PAR round of 72 playing the tips.............7121yds....75.1CR 141slope on my previous home course.

I also scored a 68 on the same course from shorter tees..........6564yds....72.5CR 137slope.Technically speaking, the 68 is the better score by a full stroke, but going around in even par from the tips gave me more personal satisfaction.

PS....I needed 6 birdies and 1 eagle to shoot 68......LOL

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted
Originally Posted by BuckeyeNut

PS....I needed 6 birdies and 1 eagle to shoot 68......LOL

Sweet!

BTW......maybe we should start asking, what's your lowest differential ever.

We'll get a better answer, and we'll also find out who actually has a valid hcp and not only understands what a differential is, but can calculate it!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Fourputt

Quote:

Originally Posted by phan52

I had a 75 on a local muni, but I don't count that.

77 on a legit, big boy golf course.

I love it when someone makes this sort of claim, as if city ownership somehow negates any possibility that a course might be worth the bother.

Here's a muni for you:  Par 72, 7705 yards - rating 75.8, slope 135

Here's another:  three 9's, each is par 36.  The shortest combination is a bit over 7100 yards, the other 2 are about 7300. The three combos are:

Rating/slope

73.9/147

73.9/146

72.8/146

Both of the above layouts are Nicklaus designs, and both are city owned and operated, one in Colorado and the other in Montana.

Just north of Denver is a Dye designed muni too: Par 72, 7067 yards - 73.3/134

Another just minutes west of Denver is yet another really nice city course;  Par 72,  at 6831 yards the shortest one I've listed, but still with a 72.5 rating and 139 slope.

Dismissing a municipal course out of hand can be quite shortsighted.

True dat!

And scores  alone mean nothing with out the course rating and slope.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

From here: http://thesandtrap.com/b/courses/golfing_scotland_with_go_ahead_tours

Quote:
On a day when the standard scratch score was 81 (a +3 had shot 78), I'm pleased to have gone round in 76, including a three-putt bogey at the Redan hole and a birdie after hitting an Audi parked just right of the short 18th, putting from behind and right of the green, and sinking a 20-footer for our group's last stroke in Scotland.

So on that day my round was equivalent to a +5 or so. That may be one of my best rounds.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Here's one of my most memorable rounds, even though I just shot my handicap that day.  Par 72 at just 6241 yards, 69.3 rating and 131 slope.  I carded an 84, even after breaking a bone in my left wrist on the 4th hole, and still beat the guy I was playing with.  He was one of my wife's business associates, up from Houston for a meeting, and we played Fossil Trace in Golden CO from the Blue (middle) tees.  The wager was a late lunch/early dinner at the Briarwood Inn ( a very nice upscale restaurant in Golden).  A couple of drinks helped to mitigate the pain, and one of the best prime (true prime) rib dinners I've had anywhere made living the next 4 weeks without golf slightly more bearable.

For whatever reason, that 84 was still one of the best ball striking rounds I've ever had.  Being unable to bend my wrist seemed to keep my swing on plane better, even though I lost significant distance with every club.  Once I adjusted to the reduced length, everything seemed to go right where I hit it.  Direction was spot on.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Fourputt

Here's one of my most memorable rounds, even though I just shot my handicap that day.  Par 72 at just 6241 yards, 69.3 rating and 131 slope.  I carded an 84, even after breaking a bone in my left wrist on the 4th hole, and still beat the guy I was playing with.  He was one of my wife's business associates, up from Houston for a meeting, and we played Fossil Trace in Golden CO from the Blue (middle) tees.  The wager was a late lunch/early dinner at the Briarwood Inn ( a very nice upscale restaurant in Golden).  A couple of drinks helped to mitigate the pain, and one of the best prime (true prime) rib dinners I've had anywhere made living the next 4 weeks without golf slightly more bearable.

For whatever reason, that 84 was still one of the best ball striking rounds I've ever had.  Being unable to bend my wrist seemed to keep my swing on plane better, even though I lost significant distance with every club.  Once I adjusted to the reduced length, everything seemed to go right where I hit it.  Direction was spot on.

I gotta wonder......how many sick puppies like me are out there right now contemplating whether or not to take a hammer their left wrist.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Best tournament round was a -8 62 on a par 70, but 65.2 rating course. Went out in 27 (-8) with 6 birdies, 2 pars and an eagle (all but one putts over 10 feet, and one was a chip-in birdie from 40 yards), then bogeyed 10 and 11. Made one more birdie and one more bogey leading into 18, where I drove the green and made the 8-footer for an eagle and a 62. The back nine is actually easier on that course, so going out in 27 and having a hot putter I was salivating about dropping a 59, but got a terrible lie in a bunker on 10 and couldn't get it out on the first swing. Frustrating. Silly isn't it, shoot a 62 and come away with frustration. Only golf!

Best score against the rating was a pair of 67s on a 72.2 course later that year. I've hovered between +2 and +3 the past two years. Gonna see if some lessons can push me into going low on more legit courses and qualifying for some of the national USGA events.


Posted
I just tied my best round ever with a 77. The reason being I was hitting fairways and greens. I had 10 pars, 3 birdies, a triple, a double, and 3 bogeys.

Posted

-6 on two different courses ... 65- par 71, 66-par 72

both featured 6 birdies and 12 pars, my only two bogey free rounds to date


Note: This thread is 4476 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.