Jump to content
Note: This thread is 3908 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I recently read regarding Doral, which underwent a renovation of most greens, that such greens are usually (always?) very fast. So if this is true, (new green = fast green) i wonder why true.  The only notion i can offer is that the grass, (sod?) has an immature root bed thus the surface of the green is closer to the underlying sand.  This may make the grass less dense and harder, thus faster. Or maybe the immediate layer beneath the turf is denser due to fewer roots.

But something must be making the surface 'harder' or 'firmer' to help create more ball speed over the surface.

Any ideas on this topic from greenkeepers?


The lack of an organic (thatch) layer on new greens means less cushioning for shots. They mentioned a lack of grain on these greens, so they probably have had a pretty agressive verticutting program that would further reduce the thatch layer. When I've played on bermuda greens, the grass is so dense that the ball hardley makes a ball mark, and when you can find a ball mark, it's hard to get the divot tool in the green. A course near me converted to bermuda from bent about three years ago, and players are still complaining about the firmness of the new greens.

The lack of an organic (thatch) layer on new greens means less cushioning for shots. They mentioned a lack of grain on these greens, so they probably have had a pretty agressive verticutting program that would further reduce the thatch layer. When I've played on bermuda greens, the grass is so dense that the ball hardley makes a ball mark, and when you can find a ball mark, it's hard to get the divot tool in the green. A course near me converted to bermuda from bent about three years ago, and players are still complaining about the firmness of the new greens.


pretty much sums it up. I would assume they did drainage work too. a dry green is a firm greeen


"FAST" and no thatch are not something that goes hand in hand. A soft green can still be very fast, a hard green can still be slow. The greens at Doral were both. Hard and fast.....they will soften up as the root system gets more substantial, the speed is determined more by how they are mowed and how dry they let them get.

Taylormade SLDR 10.5

Ping Anser 4-PW

Ping Anser 52,54,60

Ping G25 3 Wood 15

Ping I20 4 Hybrid

Scotty Cameron GoLo 7


Note: This thread is 3908 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I don't think anyone will really care.   It's your call.  Just be consistent.
    • I agree, until we are watching the 18th hole in the dark or waiting for the champion to finish and it's been 5+ hours
    • Question for the group. The course I normally play at has 27 holes - 3 9s that they use to for 18 in the various combinations. Is it okay to declare* if I’m playing front or back when I play 9 on this course? I’m figuring I need to declare before I play a shot. *meaning just say to myself that this is the back 9. Curious what people think. Of course, my only holes left are 13 and 17, so I’m going to declare the back 9 for the rest of the year. Probably only one or two more rounds though. 
    • This is my opinion as well. I would love to see the LPGA take the lead on this.    This.
    • I agree in general. The one way in which the viewer will notice the pace of play is just that "it's been an hour and Nelly Korda or Scottie Scheffler have only played four holes." Or if for some reason they show a lot of shots of players just standing around when they could be showing golf shots. But I think Andy Johnson said it most recently/best, playing fast is a skill, too. I would love for pro golfers to play faster. You'd see the players you want to see hit more shots in the same time than they do now. So I don't disagree with the pace of play stuff, and hope they can find ways to do it. Heck, the LPGA should leap at the chance to differentiate itself in this way, IMO. So: I stand by what I said in that the TV viewer really doesn't notice much about pace of play. It's rare when they do. I support increasing the pace of play wholeheartedly. But my top five reasons don't include TV ratings or viewership.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...