Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4301 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

My brother, 6'2+", 300lbs, has decided to get clubs. He took a lesson, and  played a few times last year using clubs given to him from buddies. A few weeks ago he went to Golfsmith for a static fitting. He also hit of the lie board. He bought the Cobra Baffler XL Hybrid Irons set, +2 shaft length. Yesterday he received a voicemail, from Golfsmith I think, and played it for me. Cobra does not/won't build shafts that long????  And he should let them build +1, which would not make a difference to him? I beg to differ, I think. He is learning to play and I feel that proper length WILL make a difference, for setup, hitting correctly, etc. YET, Cobra will not build shafts that long? Or could Golfsmith just saying this because of some sort of screwup? I told him to get his money back and go to the pro shop I go to. I got my Mizzies +1.25, full fitting. He only needs a static, yet my shop doesn't deduct the fitting charge. I understand he doesn't want to spend more than $600, and I feel hybrid sets are best for him. Now I don't trust Golfsmith.

Anyone have any experience or views on Golf Galaxy or Dicks? Again, he is learning, doesn't need a full shaft, head forgivness fitting, now. So he won't need the launch monitor, etc. A regular flex, and easy irons. Should I Email some other brands re the +2 shaft length? OR would an inch really not matter for him? Although that's not the point, he was fitted and they refuse to give him what he paid for.


Posted
The very first thing I would do is get a full refund!! Inc fitting cost as they have wasted your time and cannot sell you the item you payed for! This is very shoddy service! In ANY industry! However I wouldn't take it personally, he was just unlucky to deal with an inexperienced member of staff Then go get a second fitting as he could have messed that up too!

Gaz Lee


Posted
Also, for what it's worth, I wasn't happy with my first fitting, I told him the clubs felt longer than what I was used to, and heavier, and he responded, I'll get used to it! (I didn't want to get used to it) he said I should I get them 2* flat, then tried to sell me 3 to pw, knowing I'd have to go back and get a gap wedge, in the end I told him what I wanted, I said forget the 2* take half inch off, which would in turn reduce the length, swing weight and lie, Luckily I'm happy with what I got but the service wasn't too good and in future I would pay a bit more and get someone who's been recommended!

Gaz Lee


Posted
My brother, 6'2+", 300lbs, has decided to get clubs. He took a lesson, and  played a few times last year using clubs given to him from buddies. A few weeks ago he went to Golfsmith for a static fitting. He also hit of the lie board. He bought the Cobra Baffler XL Hybrid Irons set, +2 shaft length. Yesterday he received a voicemail, from Golfsmith I think, and played it for me. Cobra does not/won't build shafts that long????  And he should let them build +1, which would not make a difference to him? I beg to differ, I think. He is learning to play and I feel that proper length WILL make a difference, for setup, hitting correctly, etc. YET, Cobra will not build shafts that long? Or could Golfsmith just saying this because of some sort of screwup? I told him to get his money back and go to the pro shop I go to. I got my Mizzies +1.25, full fitting. He only needs a static, yet my shop doesn't deduct the fitting charge. I understand he doesn't want to spend more than $600, and I feel hybrid sets are best for him. Now I don't trust Golfsmith.

Anyone have any experience or views on Golf Galaxy or Dicks? Again, he is learning, doesn't need a full shaft, head forgivness fitting, now. So he won't need the launch monitor, etc. A regular flex, and easy irons. Should I Email some other brands re the +2 shaft length? OR would an inch really not matter for him? Although that's not the point, he was fitted and they refuse to give him what he paid for.

+2 sounds really odd for someone of that height. Arm length and posture play a large role in club length as well, but I personally never met anyone 6' or taller who uses clubs that long. I am 6' 2" and I personally use standard length clubs. I would recommend that he gets fit by a different company, or a certified professional outside of a big box store and perhaps (preferably) at a learning/training center. The +2" over standard just sounds strange to me.

Additionally, in my own personal and humble opinion, I would recommend you stay away from Dick's Sporting Goods. If it boils down to a big box store, I recommend Golf Galaxy if you do not have a certified professional at a training center nearby.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

I agree with Spyder, +2 is very long.  I'm 6' 1" and use standard length clubs.  The only way I can see your brother needing +2 is if his arms are quite short for his height.  I also agree Dicks's is not the place to be fit for clubs, it sounds like they messed up.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree with Spyder, +2 is very long.  I'm 6' 1" and use standard length clubs.  The only way I can see your brother needing +2 is if his arms are quite short for his height.  I also agree Dicks's is not the place to be fit for clubs, it sounds like they messed up.

Definitely. Unless the OP's brother is built like a T-Rex, +2" is most likely the result of an untrained fitter saying "You're pretty tall, so you need tall clubs".


Posted
Ok. Even so, he was told they will limit the length to an inch. So if in reality, he needs +1.5, or +1.25 as myself(6'), that is still hard to believem they would limit the shaft size. Not sure if it was the hybrids or irons. Regardless. I will tell him to get his money back and go to my pro shop. Thanks all.

Posted

Regardless. I will tell him to get his money back and go to my pro shop. Thanks all.

Good advice. It's hard to beat your local PGA pro for straightening out issues like this. Your local pro has the experience, resources and training to not only fit someone but to also recognize swing and setup issues that impact fitting. This isn't to say specialst fitters or even the chain stores don't add value, but especially for beginners, their issues are far more than just clubs. With little doubt, $600 invested in some lessons, even if your brother is swinging a set of hickories, will pay much greater dividends. As Spyder hit on with his comment, height is not the only determinant of club length. A major factor, maybe even more so than height, is what is often referred to as "wrist to floor" length. Taller people also tend to have proportionally longer arms; just because someone is a few inches taller than average, it doesn't automatically mean they need longer clubs. While I like your original thinking - in order for your brother to develop good swing habits the clubs must fit him - I think there is a tendency to "overfit" ourselves.


Note: This thread is 4301 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.