Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3991 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  Abu3baid said:

The only advice that I can give, and take it as you may..... why not raise money for some other charity that actually involves humans, like cancer research or orphans or something like that?  Animals are great and all, but I don't ever picturing my self donating to save cats and dogs when I know that I can help an orphan..  just saying.

That says a great deal about you.

  • Upvote 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


As previously mentioned you could get people to sponsor you per hole.

If you can get people to pledge $1 a hole or 50c a hole or whatever and you just play as many holes as you are able to. You would not need many sponsors to end up with a nice sum at the end of the day for your chosen charity.


I don't know the first thing about setting up a charity event.  I'm assuming the course is willing to waive green fees for the participants?  If they were I think it would be cool to do something like this... whenever someone in the group makes a birdie everyone else in the group donates $1 to the charity.  Or maybe $1 for par, $2 for birdie and $3 for eagle/ace?  Or how about $1 for par, $3 for birdie, $5 for eagle/ace?  Would that get too expensive?  Run the event all day sun up to sun down and have re-pairings and consolidations after every 9 or 18 as people show up or leave.  I think something like this would be pretty fun and I'd throw down for it if I thought it was for a good cause.


I think that would be far too expensive. Imagine you get 5 players doing that. If everyone  shoots par on every hole at 1$ that would be each player spending 4 x 18$ each. its going to be an expensive day.

I genuinely think you should get a sponsor form and get people to sponsor you per hole. Even if it was just a few cents or a dollar. You would not need many people to sponsor you before you make a substantial sum... If you could get ten people to take part and each of them gets sponsors for their holes also.

Let whoever sponsors you chose how much they would like to sponsor per hole. Let them know that you will be playing from dawn till dusk and how many holes you ESTIMATE you will play. That will give them an idea of what they could afford to sponsor you with.

Ive been thinking about doing a similar thing and talking about it has made me want to look into it properly.

Good luck mate.


  GDM0001 said:
I think that would be far too expensive. Imagine you get 5 players doing that. If everyone  shoots par on every hole at 1$ that would be each player spending 4 x 18$ each. its going to be an expensive day.

I genuinely think you should get a sponsor form and get people to sponsor you per hole. Even if it was just a few cents or a dollar. You would not need many people to sponsor you before you make a substantial sum... If you could get ten people to take part and each of them gets sponsors for their holes also.

Let whoever sponsors you chose how much they would like to sponsor per hole. Let them know that you will be playing from dawn till dusk and how many holes you ESTIMATE you will play. That will give them an idea of what they could afford to sponsor you with.

Ive been thinking about doing a similar thing and talking about it has made me want to look into it properly.

Good luck mate.

5 players?  I've never heard of 5 player groups.  Most I've seen here is 4, so even if the freak case where you get paired with not 1, not 2, but 3 scratch players and they all slam out pars like it's nobody's business you're looking at 18 x 3.  That's less than 60 bucks.  If the green fees are waived you basically just paid for your round is all.

Regardless, the money scale could be changed to whatever you want so it didn't discourage people from playing and people could certainly play 9 holes instead of 18 if they're worried about overspending.


  Strandly said:

5 players?  I've never heard of 5 player groups.  Most I've seen here is 4, so even if the freak case where you get paired with not 1, not 2, but 3 scratch players and they all slam out pars like it's nobody's business you're looking at 18 x 3.  That's less than 60 bucks.  If the green fees are waived you basically just paid for your round is all.

Regardless, the money scale could be changed to whatever you want so it didn't discourage people from playing and people could certainly play 9 holes instead of 18 if they're worried about overspending.

I agree with you, the five players was a bad example but I do see a regular 5 ball being played at my club.

Theres many different ways of doing the sponsored golf. I was just indicating a possible problem with the players spending money for each "par/bogey/birdie". If green fees are not waived it could be an expensive day for them. I was suggesting the idea of being sponsored per hole as, in my opinion, it looks like the best way to raise money. (Dependant on fitness levels and williningness to play a full days golf)

Each to their own I suppose. Both are viable.


Note: This thread is 3991 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 197 - 2025-04-15 Played 18 holes at Yeaman's Hall Club.
    • Day 13 (15 Apr 25)- late afternoon session with 6i full swings into the net and short pitches in the yard, before moving to Sw for controlled up and downs.  For kicks broke out the DCI 16° 1 iron and hit a few as into the net.  Definitely different beast. 
    • Day 24: Tax Day Stack Training Session for Full Speed Spectrum. Good session!
    • Very respectfully, I disagree.  I still believe there’s a small kernel of truth to my theory.  Hey, you, iacas and many others here are extremely knowledgeable, know the game inside out, know the tour inside out.  I’m just a schmuck who posted a take, admittedly unsupported and not up to reasonable high standards. There’s a background to my take - I’ll attempt to briefly describe it.  Back when Rory first came on tour, I thought he was great - most folks did, his talent was undeniable, and his youthful happy go lucky looking demeanor made him even more likable.  And he won early, fast - at the highest levels. And then the physical workouts started.  That was cool, man he’s looking good.  And as it went along, was even a bit shocking.  But all was still good in the Rory fan club. But as a few years rolled along and the majors stopped, folks like me started to question the effect of the physical build up.  (raising my hand here - - folks like me were probably concentrating 95% on the majors record, and failing to acknowledge his stellar play overall) The matches with Patrick Reed...  Somewhere around that time, Patrick became “the most hated man on tour”.  Raising my hand again, not sure if that timing is accurate, or even if that moniker was deserved.  But when Rory got into the screaming flex-off, it definitely detracted from the earlier Rory likability.  It’s kinda like he was lowering himself to Patrick’s level.  Not so great, for me at least. As the mid 2010s rolled along, and the majors drought continued, and the near misses at the Masters happened, the dreaded ‘choke’ perception inevitably raised its head and persisted.  I joined in with the chorus, not disliking Rory, but certainly questioning his ability to close the Masters or any other major.  Rightfully or wrongly, it was there. Then LIV came along.  As that developed, I saw the anti-LIV sentiment develop along with it, and I took offense to it.  My thought - these guys are being offered life changing $$, and the anti-LIV folks are trying to stop them from getting it. And then when Rory rose to ‘lead’ the anti-LIV sector, that really rubbed me the wrong way.  The press conferences, the parking lot shouting match - it just all seemed really distasteful to me.  And it seemed far far away from the early Rory, who I really liked. So all that (in my own mind) led me down the “Rory will never win.. yada yada”.  Not based on any real statistical analysis.  Not taking into account the incredible stats and winning record he had amassed. Purely based on perception and cultural silliness.  AND - the physical thing, which as I mentioned, I think there’s a tiny kernel of merit there. So - fast forward to Rory’s post win press conference.  THAT was the old Rory I remembered!  The totally cool guy, humble, forthright, honest, self deprecating.  He’s probably been like that all along.  And he’s certainly backed off the hard core anti-LIV persona, at least in public. That’s it.  Just a stupid unsupported take from a dumbsh*t golf fan.  For me, this was the most exciting major since the Tiger era. I really thought it would be a gladiator death match between Rory and Bryson.  I’m surprised that Bryson fell off - - I thought he was well-set-up to handle the pressure.  I’m sure he’ll be there many times in the future, along with Rory.
    • I've been watching golf for 35 years and I've seen my fair share of exciting events, but I cannot recall ever watching so much up and down in the fortunes of one player in one round of golf. How good the good shots were and how bad the bad shots were and how he was leading, then not, then leading again, then way clear, then tied, then behind, then leading, then in a playoff, then winning. Heck I aged just watching it on the TV - Rory must have gone through some stuff out there. Just incredible. Consider that Rory had two double bogeys, three bogeys, six birdies, and Rose made only 4 pars, 4 bogeys, and 10 birdies. 10! Round that place? Mind officially blown.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...