Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Posting a Tournament Score

2 posts in this topic

I recently played in our annual 4-Ball Match Play Tournament run by our committee at our local club. I noticed when the updated Ghin scores were posted on 7/1 the rounds I played were not under Tournament Scores. I asked the local Pro and he said this club only recognizes Metal Play events as Tournament Scores.

I debated the fact that the 3 Major Tournaments at our club should be recognized as Tournament scores as have in the past years. I was told the Committee recently changed the club ruling to Metal Play scores only shall be posted as Tournament scores.

The only event played at the club all season using Medal Play would be two rounds for the Club Championship Qualifier.

IMO this local club rule would eliminate the exceptional scores from the Ghin system and allow golfers not to be as aggressive during normal play and put the hammer down during Tournament Play.

Is this promoting sandbaggers?


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Here's an interesting article from the USGA Handicap website:

Posting A Score As A Tournament Score Posted: 12/17/2012

By Scott Hovde, Assistant Director, Handicap and Course Rating Administration

What determines a tournament score in terms of posting for handicap purposes?

The USGA Handicap System™ is based around the concept of a player’s potential, and scores made in a tournament setting can provide a very good indication of such potential. One of the procedures within the System deals with identifying players who have at least two exceptional tournament scores in their scoring record

An exceptional score is defined as a score with a differential of 3.0 or more below the player’s current Handicap Index®. This brings up the issue of which scores should be posted as tournament scores. There are a number of factors when determining whether a score should be posted as a tournament score. One is whether the score is made in a competition organized and conducted by a Committee in charge of the competition. Another is whether the competition identifies a winner(s) and is played under the principles of the Rules of Golf.

Essentially we are looking to identify significant events where a player would have much more riding on the outcome of the round compared to a casual round of golf.  So a club championship, member-guest, etc. would be the type of event meeting this requirement. In addition, qualifying round(s) for significant events such as local, regional or state championships would all typically meet the requirement for a tournament score.

Regular play days at a club and any non-competitive events such as social outings should not be identified as tournament scores, as they do not carry the same significance as formal events.  The number of total eligible tournament scores in a player’s scoring record is one of the factors used in determining if a player qualifies for a handicap reduction, and if so, the amount of reduction.  Over-designating tournament scores will actually reduce the effectiveness of identifying those who perform exceptionally in the more significant events.

The ultimate decision of whether to designate a competition as a tournament score is up to the Handicap Committee in consultation with the Committee in charge of the competition. If a club or committee is unsure whether a competition should be considered a tournament score, they can contact the authorized golf association or the USGA Handicap Department for guidance.

I would tend to agree with you.  The match play tournaments strike me as significant events where the player has more riding on the outcome compared to a casual round of golf.

You can ask them to ask the question from the local authorized golf association, but I suspect they're not going to want to do that.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • It only looks like a smaller target. If you miss or barely knick the ball that putt probably wouldn't have gone in a golf hole. It takes about the same amount of precision to putt into a hole as it does to hit a golf ball as a target. As such, I agree that it makes a good substitute when the practice green is crowded. 
    • It would never happen, but I would like to see two holes on each green. Obviously not close to each other. This may help to keep the greens in better shape and also speed up play. 
    • We still have a situation today with a relatively uneducated public. Next time you're at the supermarket, ask someone to name the Secretary of State (BTW it's John Kerry). Ask someone to name their State Senator or State Representative or the two houses in the legislative branch of their state. How about name the governor? Or Mayor? Ask them what Damascus is (it's the capitol of Syria). Ask them what Kabul is. How about Yemen. Ask them what Mosul is. Then ask them what Utah is. You get my point. Getting rid of the Electoral College would require amending the constitution. This requires that this Amendment pass the House of Representatives AND the Senate with a 2/3 majority, then be ratified by 3/4 of the states. Normally it takes about 10 years when you can get anything through Congress. Try to get that to happen given current divisions in our country. We have this discussion every four years. We've had it since 1968. I think we'd have better luck at the state level trying to get proportional divisions.  How the electoral votes are divided depends upon the constitution of your state. Your state can amend its constitution to divide up its electoral votes proportionally or keep it winner take all, but any change will require a state constitutional amendment.  Changes as such might make third parties more viable. Major parties are loathe to do this because a viable third party candidate might garner enough votes to trigger various mechanisms outlined in the Constitution. 1) If there is a 269-269 tie, the House chooses the President and the Senate chooses the Vice President. 2) If no one wins enough (say if that third party candidate who is leading in Utah won the state), the House will choose the President from the three candidates who won the most electoral votes, and the Senate would choose the Vice President from the three VP candidates. There have been ties three times in our history. Proportional division would likely lead to scenario 2 taking place quite often.
    • I decided to pick up a 7 wood. I love hitting my 4 wood so much that a 7 wood seems logical. Much my chagrin, my 3 iron has been unreliable, even though I am hitting my irons well. I started trying to hit a abbreviated 4 wood instead of my 3 iron, which has not been too bad but not ideal. It often goes a little too far. I bought a Cobra F6 7/8 because I wanted to be able to adjust loft to get dialed in at around 215 yards.
    • Yeah, I'm not sold on the sandals thing. Welcome.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 17hoffmanc
      (18 years old)
    2. jamo
      (24 years old)
  • Blog Entries