Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Wedge shafts

2 posts in this topic

Should wedge shafts be the same as my regular irons. I use regular shafts in my irons but most of the wedges off the racks are stiff. I have a set of Cleveland 588 rtg wedges in 49, 54 and 60 but they are stiff shafts. I have thought that because they are so short it really doesn't matter that much but am I right?


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Cleveland uses the Tour Concept Wedgeflex as stock shaft for the Cle 588 RTG (raw tour grind) wedges. This is a 118 gram shaft, a bit lighter than the True Temper Dynamic Gold S300 shaft.

From the Cleveland website:

  • Exclusive stiffness profile with less active tip
  • More penetrating ball flight, increased spin and optimal distance control - along with superior feel.

This shaft is similar to the older TRAction (Tour Reflex Action) Wedgeflex that was used in the CG14, CG15 and CG16 wedges. The TRAction shaft had a stiffer than normal butt for lower launch, but a somewhat softer tip to allow increased spin and touch on partial shots. The TRAction had similar profile to the TT Spinner Flex (minus the flex joint at midshaft).

It appears the Tour Concept Wf has a slightly firmer tip than the TRAction. (Cleveland partnered with True Temper in developing both shafts).

Many players can handle Wedgeflex (moderately stiff) shafts in their wedges because, as you noted, the shafts are shorter. Also, the heavier Wedgeflex shafts allows the golfer to drop the club "into the slot" easier on partial shots.

But, it all comes down to feel. Some players like their wedges to have the same shafts as their irons. If you check out the 588 RTG link, you'll see seven custom shafts you can order if you don't want the Tour Concept.

A good clubsmith could offer you additional shafts, if you wanted to reshaft.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Of all things for optimization 'puring' would make the least difference in consistency. Shafts are not out of round or lacking in straightness as they used to. So, I agree. Puring can be not as beneficial considering how good new shafts are. The ball-bearing puring is a lazy way of doing it. I think using frequency counter is a proper method. And even with that all you are really doing is confirming that the frequency (stiffness) of the shaft is what it says it is.   If the orientation of the heavy side is made facing the target (generally direction clubface expected at impact) it may give you the stiffest orientation. It may not necessarily be the best, i.e., there's no point finding the stiff orientation spine if you are expecting a R-flex. Mind you, all of this is splitting hair in the first place. I am not sure how any of this affects consistency of shaft kick shot after shot anyway. Any shaft is consistent to a flex level in whatever orientation it is set at - heavy side, light side, strong side, weak side, etc. Bottom line.. hit the ball on a launch monitor and if launches and spins best then that is the purest shaft in combo with the head and grip. I will say this that bending fatigue (flex of shaft softens over hundreds of hits..) is a real phenomenon and if you are an avid hack (once a week) then you should consider shaft or even driver replacement every 3-4 years as a rule of thumb IMHO. Of course performance would have to be your best guide.      
    • I'm not sure if this qualifies as "best shot" or "worst shot."    I was about 160 yards from the green on a par 4.  I yanked it hard left and the ball hit a tree about 100 yards away and about 60 yards from the green.   The ball stopped about 6 feet behind the pin and I sunk the putt for birdie.    
    • Note to self.   My index is going to go up even with that low score of 85 since the rating and slope is so much lower. I guess I need to start shooting more lower scores.
    • Having ditched my 3 wood in favor of 5 wood, I decided to experiment a bit and place a four wood back in play. By wood, I mean "real" wood. I have a set of Ben Hogan Speed Slot woods that I fool around with from time to time. I find that when my game is on, the older woods work pretty well. I like the small heads although there is no margin for error. The only concern I have, and not really one that I  am too worried about, is using the older woods with modern/Surylyn or Urethane covered balls.  So far, I have not noticed any nicks or anything, but then again, they have not been hit all that much. I thought about buying a box or two of Balatas, but if you go Titleist, they are a bit pricey.I have not tried the other brands such as Top Flight Z, Dunlop, Maxfli,  Wilson which are a little less expensive.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Jmwest76
      (40 years old)
    2. Mikael Detterberg
      Mikael Detterberg
      (34 years old)
    3. SBrown
      (26 years old)
    4. scottyarcy
      (33 years old)
  • Blog Entries