Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4093 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was wondering if anyone had some experience with these and whether or not they were better (or even were noticeably different from) the the standard KBS wedge shafts. I'm asking since, once next week's state tournament is completed, I am thinking of switching out my new wedges' shafts to the KBS Hi-Rev over the KBS wedge shaft (they have DG S200 "wedge flex" in them, which I know is a poor fit for me).

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have both in my wedges, Hi-Rev in my 54 and 58 and Wedge in my 50. I suspect the Wedge is not a good fit for me in the 50 because I am all over the place with that club. It never feels right with a full swing. Not sure what the stiffer tip does or doesn't do for me but my north to south dispersion is terrible with that shaft. Around the greens I am fine with it but I really only use the 50 for certain shots, toe down putt type chips, bumps etc. The Hi-Rev I love, feels good for everything. I will be pulling the Wedge out of my 50 and going with a regular KBS to match my irons. The Wedge felt so bad to me I wondered if I got a bad shaft. Went back to using my stock gap wedge of the same loft with the KBS Tour and all my problems disappeared.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Depends on your swing and fit ... the Hi Rev comes in various flexes.

The feel is fine, gets the ball up, spins well around the greens.

Whether you use it in the PW depends on how you use that wedge. If you only use it on full or half wedges far from the green, you may want to go with your iron shaft. In the higher lofted wedges, where you want more spin on partials, chips, and rely on loft to get the ball up, the Hi Rev may work well for you.

Your mileage will vary because our swings and needs are different.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4093 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.