Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4069 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lately I have been looking at different players and their position at A5. Particularly players clubface position. The question for the experts @iacas and @mvmac is what is considered square at A5. Robert Rock looks to me to be open at A5. Jason Dufner is fractionally more closed that Rock but still open by my definition. So my questions are:

1. Are my assumptions about the clubface (open/square) right?

2. What is the affect of a closed clubface at A5?

3. What will the golfer do at A7 to compensate for the clubface being too closed?

In my swing I think I am too closed at A5 which leads me to have to compensate in the downswing.

Note: This is not something I am actively working on. I am laser focused on extension from A4 to A8, but more a curiosity in A5.

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I would say it depends on a lot of factors. The type of grip, how the person transitions the club, turn rates.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Interesting. I don't know much about it but from the pictures there seems to be a progressing common denominator in the three pictures.

Robert Rock has the shaft "aimed" above the ball.

Dufner has the shaft "aimed" pretty much at the ball.

Michael has the shaft "aimed" inside the ball.

I wonder if it's a coincidence that the club faces follow the same progressions?


Posted

I would say it depends on a lot of factors. The type of grip, how the person transitions the club, turn rates.

Hmm, I am suspicious of this comment because we can agree at other positions (A2 or A4 for example) what is square and what is not. This is why I am wondering about A5.

Interesting. I don't know much about it but from the pictures there seems to be a progressing common denominator in the three pictures.

Robert Rock has the shaft "aimed" above the ball.

Dufner has the shaft "aimed" pretty much at the ball.

Michael has the shaft "aimed" inside the ball.

I wonder if it's a coincidence that the club faces follow the same progressions?

Good observation. I can do some more study to see if there is correlation to this theory.

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hmm, I am suspicious of this comment because we can agree at other positions (A2 or A4 for example) what is square and what is not. This is why I am wondering about A5.

Good observation. I can do some more study to see if there is correlation to this theory.

If traditionally, square at the top means the clubface is inline with the shaft.

At A5, I would assume that some rotation back towards the swing path occurs, given not much because it is early in the downswing. So I would say square, you should be able to see maybe the toe of the clubface. If you wanted to define what square is.

I am not sure even looking at the clubface at this position is even that important.

You can easily look at A6 and see if the clubface is really closed or open, as well if the clubhead is inside or outside the hands for swing path.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4069 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.