Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Our Korean women vs your Korean women


Note: This thread is 3937 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Have been watching the australian Women's Open and have been pondering the Olympic Games Golf gold medal battle in Rio We on Australia have our clutch of " ozzie" Koreans and have noted many representing other nations !! What are they doing right in Korea with ladies golf ? Obviously a lot going right ! The men left far behind ! What is it ? What's going on ?

  • Moderator
Posted

Have been watching the australian Women's Open and have been pondering the Olympic Games Golf gold medal battle in Rio

We on Australia have our clutch of " ozzie" Koreans and have noted many representing other nations !! What are they doing right in Korea with ladies golf ? Obviously a lot going right ! The men left far behind ! What is it ? What's going on ?


Golf is an important sport in Korea for women and men.  When you focus on a sport, you become good at it.  Add to that Korean players can go to the US and compete in college golf if they are not ready for the LPGA level yet.  So there are ample ways to improve.

It is refreshing and really is helping Women's golf in my opinion.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Korean men aren't that far behind: granted, there more than a dozen ladies placed higher than the Rolex Rankings than the highest man of Korean descent in the men's world ranking (Kevin Na, 28th), but there are still plenty of them teeing up on the major tours week after week. The difference is that the women's professional ranks are not as the men's, which shines a light on how comprehensive the Korean system is compared to the U.S. and Europe, and that women, unlike men, are exempt from South Korea's compulsory military service, which takes years out of young Korean men's development. The first wave of Korean men (Choi, Yang) didn't start their pro careers until after serving, but when today's crop turn pro as teenagers, the options are to take an extended break from one's career just as it's getting started, or hope the government grants an exemption sometime down the line. If you've read any of the recent news about Sang-Moon Bae, the latter is a tough proposition.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted

Looking at the small % of golfers that are of Korean ancestry and their success on the LPGA, to me it must be the amount of drive and dedication, disciplined values, obsession to excel, and love of the game that drives the Korean women.  I would put some of PGA Tour players from tiny Northern Ireland, Scotland, and South Africa in the same category.  Of course, most successful golfers have these attributes including Tiger, Bubba, and a host of others from the US, but for some of these small populations to perform so well is a fine accomplishment.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Men's golf is orders of magnitude harder to succeed given vastly larger competition.   If LPGA becomes a  household sport that attracts as many would be pro golfers as PGA does globally, you will see more parity.    For this reason, I don't see Korean men having any chance of matching their counterpart's success in LPGA.

Watch out for Chinese women.   They got population and money to replace Korean women's dominance in 10 - 20 years.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Men's golf is orders of magnitude harder to succeed given vastly larger competition.   If LPGA becomes a  household sport that attracts as many would be pro golfers as PGA does globally, you will see more parity.    For this reason, I don't see Korean men having any chance of matching their counterpart's success in LPGA.

Watch out for Chinese women.   They got population and money to replace Korean women's dominance in 10 - 20 years.

I disagree, I mean look at James Hahn, K J Choi, Y E Yang, etc.

Also, can you imagine the son's of all these LPGA Korean women from all over the world?

I play rounds with some older Korean women who are super serious about golf. If I break a rule, they're all over me. Just short of getting my head smacked. . . :-D

They're some pretty deadly serious golfers.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Anyone know if the practice regimen in Korea is much different from the rest of the world? Asians are good in a lot of sports and games because they put a lot of effort, dedication and money into it. They are better because they work harder and more structured. I've wondered if this is the case with female golf, too.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3937 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.