Jump to content
IGNORED

Golf Digest Cover goes risque once again *possibly NSFW*


Crim
Note: This thread is 2968 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Enough twisting words.

Bizarre referred to you classifying the cover as "showing her chest." It had nothing to do with the men in the documentary saying that they don't care about women's sports.

I don't know what you're trying to say there, but it does not seem relevant to this conversation.

You're missing the point. Why should a female athlete only be recognized for her athleticism? And how is being the cover model and showing off her body, of which she's ostensibly proud as it's the thing she uses in expressing her athleticism, not be "recognized for her athleticism"? It's not like they put Shen Shen Feng on the cover of the fitness issue.

I don't care about the documentary.

I think Golf Digest has a bit of a target on its head since they put Paulina on the cover, even though she's only tangentially related to the game, over other more accomplished female golfers. It's totally acceptable for them to put athletic female golfers on their covers and highlight their bodies when it's the fitness issue, but it'd take the bite out of the criticism if they occasionally had a female golfer on in similar poses they have the men in. Holly Sonders in May 2013 is the only really one that fits the bill. Michelle Wie's cover didn't have anything golf related on it. Inbee Park did amazing things in golf. Have her on with a 5 iron slung over he shoulder and we're good. I'm sure she can give us two or three tips on how to totally bomb it this year.

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I think Golf Digest has a bit of a target on its head since they put Paulina on the cover, even though she's only tangentially related to the game, over other more accomplished female golfers. It's totally acceptable for them to put athletic female golfers on their covers and highlight their bodies when it's the fitness issue, but it'd take the bite out of the criticism if they occasionally had a female golfer on in similar poses they have the men in. Holly Sonders in May 2013 is the only really one that fits the bill. Michelle Wie's cover didn't have anything golf related on it. Inbee Park did amazing things in golf. Have her on with a 5 iron slung over he shoulder and we're good. I'm sure she can give us two or three tips on how to totally bomb it this year.


So what's your point exactly? They shouldn't have had Paulina on the cover? Okay. So what - what's that got to do with this cover, right here, right now, and Lexi's decision to do it or not? She shouldn't have because of a cover two years ago? She should have said "oh, get Camilo Villegas or something"? Of course not.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So what's your point exactly? They shouldn't have had Paulina on the cover? Okay. So what - what's that got to do with this cover, right here, right now, and Lexi's decision to do it or not? She shouldn't have because of a cover two years ago? She should have said "oh, get Camilo Villegas or something"? Of course not.

Not at all. Just that Golf Digest seems to push the attractiveness angle in females over their golfer status in a disproportionate way to how they portray male golfers. It's fine in any given instance, but the whole trend taken together is kind of a bummer. They should occasionally make it seem like they're recognizing the female golfer for being an exceptional golfer.

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So what's your point exactly? They shouldn't have had Paulina on the cover? Okay. So what - what's that got to do with this cover, right here, right now, and Lexi's decision to do it or not? She shouldn't have because of a cover two years ago? She should have said "oh, get Camilo Villegas or something"? Of course not.


The point is that the wives and girlfriends of major sporting stars in all codes get pretty much more media coverage than female sporting stars themselves. That is a problem.

Lexi can do what she likes. It's her body.

But that doesn't mean that  a  male dominated sports media can't do some work to get better, even if part of the logic is to say "Hey guys, guess what? They aren't all fat ugly lesbians! Check this one out!"

This is a philosophical argument that is degenerating into a discussion about specifics, which isn't serving anyone.

I'll bet there are a lot of people who don't follow golf who wouldn't recognise Stacy Lewis or Lydia Ko if they bumped into them in the street.

But they may have seen bikini pics of Natalia Gulbis and Anna Kournikova and that is how they see women's tennis and women's golf.

Just because sex sells and people of a certain age can choose their own path doesn't mean that it helps everyone because it doesn't.

Laura Davies is most probably one of the nicest, most sincere and generous professional golfers ever to play the game, regularly turning up at charity golf events and doing stuff without making it a photo opportunity and adored by her peers. Not a "fitness" issue cover on her resume, but  lots snide remarks from frat boy types and those who should know better because she doesn't promote "femininity", for want of a better term.

It would be great to see someone who is making millions from the game resist the stereotypical "lads' mag" photoshoot.

Consumers should be demanding more. I'm not blaming the athletes.

But while men dominate the sports marketing and sports media worlds, it won't change.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Think we're overthinking this ... it's about selling mags. Turn the page...

  • Upvote 1

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Think we're overthinking this ... it's about selling mags. Turn the page...


True enough.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
[QUOTE name="dkolo" url="/t/81163/golf-digest-cover-goes-risque-once-again-possibly-nsfw/36#post_1124208"]   Not at all. Just that Golf Digest seems to push the attractiveness angle in females over their golfer status in a disproportionate way to how they portray male golfers. [/QUOTE] So? The women, when asked, should say no? They should say "Put Patrick Reed on the cover instead?" Golf Digest is in it to sell magazines. They probably have a better idea how to do that than you or I. Plus, the month prior, they had Rory shirtless (yes, as a statue, but it still showed off some chiseled abs and so on). So…? [QUOTE name="dkolo" url="/t/81163/golf-digest-cover-goes-risque-once-again-possibly-nsfw/36#post_1124208"]   It's fine in any given instance, but the whole trend taken together is kind of a bummer. They should occasionally make it seem like they're recognizing the female golfer for being an exceptional golfer.  [/QUOTE] I don't care about the magazine, really. They're selling magazines and trying to remain relevant. I'm talking mostly about the decision Lexi made, and I haven't seen a good argument why she should have declined the offer or that it was a "bad" decision. [QUOTE name="Shorty" url="/t/81163/golf-digest-cover-goes-risque-once-again-possibly-nsfw/36#post_1124209"]   ​The point is that the wives and girlfriends of major sporting stars in all codes get pretty much more media coverage than female sporting stars themselves. That is a problem. [/QUOTE] @Shorty , you're doing a fine job of imitating a brick wall tonight. ;-) How the heck does a magazine cover where one of the LPGA's youngest rising stars continue that trend? That's rhetorical, because the answer is obvious: it doesn't.   [QUOTE name="Shorty" url="/t/81163/golf-digest-cover-goes-risque-once-again-possibly-nsfw/36#post_1124209"]   But that doesn't mean that  a  male dominated sports media can't do some work to get better, even if part of the logic is tpo say "Het guys, guess what? They aren't all fat ugly lesbians! Check this one out!" [/QUOTE] I'm not really discussing the "male dominated sports media."   [QUOTE name="Shorty" url="/t/81163/golf-digest-cover-goes-risque-once-again-possibly-nsfw/36#post_1124209"]   I'll bet there are a lot of people who don't follow golf who wouldn't recognise Stacy Lewis or Lydia Ko if they bumped into them in the street. But they may have seen bikini pics of Natalia Gulbis and Anna Kournikova and that is how they see women's tennis and women's golf. [/QUOTE] So what? Would you rather they just go on not recognizing the players at all? In any context?   [QUOTE name="Shorty" url="/t/81163/golf-digest-cover-goes-risque-once-again-possibly-nsfw/36#post_1124209"]   Just because sex sells and people of a certain age can choose their own path doesn't mean that it helps everyone because it doesn't. [/QUOTE] I don't see anyone making that argument.   [QUOTE name="Shorty" url="/t/81163/golf-digest-cover-goes-risque-once-again-possibly-nsfw/36#post_1124209"]   Laura Davies is most probably one of the nicest, most sincere and generous professional golfers ever to play the game, regularly turning up at charity golf events and doing stuff without making it a photo opportunity and adored by her peers. Not a "fitness" issue cover on her resume, but  lots snide remarks from frat boy types and those who should know better because she doesn't promote "femininity", for want of a better term. [/QUOTE] As you said, she shouldn't be on the cover of a fitness issue. Among the things I'm decidedly not discussing: the value of Laura Davies as a human being. [QUOTE name="Shorty" url="/t/81163/golf-digest-cover-goes-risque-once-again-possibly-nsfw/36#post_1124209"]   Consumers should be demanding more. I'm not blaming the athletes. [/QUOTE] You've talked plenty about "the athletes." Scroll back and re-read your posts. Good night.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Stop twisting words or intentionally misleading or whatever it is you're doing. My use of the word "bizarre" referred to you classifying the cover in question as "showing her chest." It had nothing to do with the men in the documentary saying that they don't care about women's sports or whatever.

I don't know what you're trying to say there, but it does not seem relevant to this conversation. She's not a professional golfer looking to promote herself, make money, drive interest in the LPGA Tour, or other things like that.

And why should a female athlete only be recognized for her athleticism? And how is being the cover model and showing off her body, of which she's ostensibly proud as it's the thing she uses in expressing her athleticism, not being "recognized for her athleticism"?

I don't care about the documentary. At the end of the day, you're passing judgment despite not being a young female golfer with a major on her record already. You don't like it. That doesn't make it wrong.

How on earth does it "take away from her golfing ability"? Do they remove one tournament win or add a stroke to her scorecard every time she does something some old man somewhere does not approve of?

Inbee is not as "fit" as Lexi, and the issue is the Fitness issue. Lexi is, one could conclude, proud of her body. At least this year we don't have a TV host (Holly) or a girlfriend/party girl (Paulina). At least this year we have a golfer.

Straw man. It's the fitness issue. I highly doubt the oncology monthly publications have "fitness" issues.

Fitness issue? Sure it is. And if she had whip cream on her chest would it be the cooking issue? When is the last time you saw a woman working out topless in the gym? I have my own feelings about the cover but let's call it for what it is, the sex sells issue. Marketing 101.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So? The women, when asked, should say no? They should say "Put Patrick Reed on the cover instead?" Golf Digest is in it to sell magazines. They probably have a better idea how to do that than you or I. Plus, the month prior, they had Rory shirtless (yes, as a statue, but it still showed off some chiseled abs and so on). So…? I don't care about the magazine, really. They're selling magazines and trying to remain relevant. I'm talking mostly about the decision Lexi made, and I haven't seen a good argument why she should have declined the offer or that it was a "bad" decision.

I think you're misunderstanding me. I'm not saying I have any problem with this or any particular cover shoot they've done with women (except maybe the Paulina one but even then, whatever). If Lexi is down for this kind of cover, I think she's welcome to go for it. No issues with it. But I'd like Golf Digest to make an effort to present female golfers as golfers and not sex symbols. Like, I doubt being topless was Lexi's idea when they approached her. I'm just encouraging Golf Digest to, in some of the rare instances they do present female golfers, focus on them as golfers. It's not something I'm really up in arms about by any means, just that I think it'd be a good thing for the game and the legitimacy of the women's tour if they presented them in a similar light to the men. So to your last point, our focuses are different. My point wasn't about Lexi's shoot in particular at all, just its position in the larger context.

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Fitness issue? Sure it is.

It's the fitness issue. Yes. The rest of your post does not deserve a reply. @dkolo , again, I'm not discussing the magazine's decision. I'm sure they know more about selling magazines than you or I.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's the fitness issue. Yes. The rest of your post does not deserve a reply. @dkolo , again, I'm not discussing the magazine's decision. I'm sure they know more about selling magazines than you or I.

And People magazine is a good source for current world events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just for the record, Anna Kournikova has two Grand Slam titles to her credit.  Neither of them can be taken away no matter how you slice it.

Driver:  :nike:  Vapor Pro 9.5°  Wood & Hybrids : :nike:Covert Tour 13°, 18° & 21°
Irons & Wedges:
  :nike:  Covert 2.0  5i - AW,  :titleist:   56-14F,  60-07S
Putter:     :titleist:Newport Select
Balls:  :bridgestone: B330-RX

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just for the record, Anna Kournikova has two Grand Slam titles to her credit.  Neither of them can be taken away no matter how you slice it.

Say what?????? Edit: never mind, I see that you're being sneaky and talking about doubles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Say what??????

She won in doubles.

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just for the record, Anna Kournikova has two Grand Slam titles to her credit.  Neither of them can be taken away no matter how you slice it.


Two less than Todd Woodbridge's 22 . :-P

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Say what??????

Edit: never mind, I see that you're being sneaky and talking about doubles.

Driver:  :nike:  Vapor Pro 9.5°  Wood & Hybrids : :nike:Covert Tour 13°, 18° & 21°
Irons & Wedges:
  :nike:  Covert 2.0  5i - AW,  :titleist:   56-14F,  60-07S
Putter:     :titleist:Newport Select
Balls:  :bridgestone: B330-RX

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Think we're overthinking this ... it's about selling mags. Turn the page...

Was it a bad choice for young female golfers to see, though? I'm sure there are 10 or 11 year old girls out there obsessed with the game, some have a subscription to Golf Digest (or their parents do). In a era where a 17 year old is #1, is it ill fitting for a 19 year old star to be on the cover topless?

Joel Holden

https://twitter.com/JHolden138

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Golf digest, like many magazines are in a world of hurt & are desparate for anyone to simply pick it up. Lexi is a beautiful women and I think more so in her golf swing and with her shirt on. I expect a photo like that on another magazine not golf digest. I think it cheapens the product. Clearly something is happening at GD, with articles about losers like Johnny Manzel and Lance Armstrong....who are they trying to appeal to? Or alienate? It seems as of late the first several pages, do not even feature golf related product, rather luxury automobiles and ciallis ads
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 2968 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 6:  Played my 6th 9 hole game and beat my best score by 1.  Yay. 
    • I need to find a 200 yd club. I am playing sTM speed blades right now and I like them due to trajectory. I get them up really high. But my 4 iron is 20* and flies185 in the air. My 3 wood averages 215. I am looking for a  club, preferably an iron , that will go 190-205 cuz I got a gap there. I got an old Adams idea 3 hybrid that if I swing like an iron,goes 185. If I swing it like  wood it will get to 200 but I lose accuracy. I would really like to replace the hybrid with an iron that will get me 10-15 more yds. is there a super hot 2/3 iron out there that  could get me there with more consistency ? That gap comes up usually every round or two.
    • I've been enjoying practicing with the GCQuadMAX lately. I thought I'd take a little time to talk about how I use it during my practice. I practiced tonight with a 6I (my trust Nike VRII Pro/TW blade). First, I'll just say this: it's not about the ball flight or the shot. I'll pick a target on the range that's close to the distance I normally hit it, but it's just… because hitting it into a field is a little boring. And occasionally I hit a "shot" but the bulk of my practice is not about hitting shots, but working something specific. Here's the data in my default display (I'm using GSPro often for this type of stuff): Clubhead and ball speed are self explanatory, as is smash factor and spin (this was a 6I with a lower spinning premium ball). Club path is 4.3° right on this shot, with a spin axis of -6.9° (nice!), or a draw. The ball started 1.9° right, launched at 19.4° (a bit high, because…) AoA was 0.2° up. The ball reached a peak height of 117.2 feet, carried 183.1 yards, and was 5.7 feet left of the target line. A decent shot… if the ball was on a little tee or was sitting up in a lush fairway. 😄  Anyway… The only number I cared about for the first 20 or 25 shots today is the path. Since I care about the path, I use my alignment stick to make sure the QuadMAX is aligned, and I don't care much about what the face is, etc. This shot, like almost every shot I hit today, was a two-step swing. I'd swing back, pause, then swing down. I'm trying to do two things: take it back without folding my right wrist back a lot, then throw the club "behind" me with the elbow pit staying facing out longer. After my path was consistently 2-5° out, I'd start to care a little about the AoA. I moved the ball back a smidgen in my stance, and worked on feeling my chest stay down a little. I also slightly shortened the swing, as that would result in the hands getting to impact zone a bit earlier relative to the rest of my chest. Not surprisingly to me (but perhaps to others), my speed typically goes up when I do this. Here's a fuller screenshot with the number son the left made larger (and replacing the mini map in the GSPro software on the right side of the screen): As you can see, a similar shot. Path was still out, spin axis was still a bit left (barely), AoA was a bit better, offline was still pretty small… and the ball went a bit farther with more ball speed because I got up to 94.2 MPH clubhead speed with a still decent smash factor. This ball was a slight push a touch toward the toe - if my path is 3.1° right and the start line is 3.7° right… and the ball draws, that's a slight toe hit. A look at the QuadMAX screen confirmed that. At one point, I made the shortest swing I could, with the fastest downswing piece (what I'm trying to do) that I could. I really didn't care about the face on this one: Path and AoA are good. Speeds are good. Smash wasn't bad considering the face was wide open.
    • I shot a 34 on a Podunk par 3. got 5 pars in a row but skulled 2  "pitches" off of dried mud. killed my round. I guess I'll bump and run whenever I am on hardpan from now on
    • 39-39 today for a 78. 6860 yards, 72.6 rating I hit 12 greens but couldn't get a putt to drop. That was frustrating. Hit in the fescue on 9 and 15 for doubles and other than that played well with 14 pars, 2 bogeys, and those two doubles.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...