Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3804 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Guys so I am playing the Nike vr pro cavities and this is my first year really into it on a reg basis...I have taken alot of strokes of with just hitting at the range, from around 100 to consistently around 85 or 87 and I really have the urge to try a different iron. I have a fella willing to to trade my Pro Cavities for a set of good looking Ping G 10 irons..woukd I notice a difference I know I am going back a couple years but just read great things and I like the VRS but the his hits seem harsh and the distances just seem to be very erratic sometimes ..any help on the pings would be great thanks!

  • Moderator
Posted

That's what I thought ...what about the Titleist ap1 710s? Are those pretty forgiving ...

Yes those are going to somewhere between the G10's and the Nike VR pro irons.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
G10's will launch higher and will be more forgiving.

This can cause problems if you have decent swingspeed. Back in 2009, I was looking to replace my stiff-shafted irons from 1994 with R-flex.

I tried both the Ping G10 and the (original) Callaway Big Berthas, which were listed as SGI irons by Golf Digest , and UGI by Maltby. But, each had a stock high-launch shaft that tended to balloon the short irons. I ended up going with the Callaway X20 irons, which had a mid-launch Uniflex shaft (between R and S).

You might want to test-hit the G10 short irons before you trade.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So of the G10 and AP1 710s which one would be the better upgrade from the Nike VRs...i know going to the G10 is a few years backwards but i am not talking about that, by upgrading i mean a more forgiving club that would last a while.


Posted

Yea I saw where the maltby factor was very high on the 710s if that means anything but it was higher


My issue with the 710 AP1 is that they are so clunky and awkward looking. My theory is that you must love the look and performance.

The 712 and 714 are better versions of the same club.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

yea i guess i could wait and play mine a little longer until something better comes along or i can sell mine towards a newer set...i dont hate the Nikes i just feel like i have gotten a little better and i see people playing other irons that i feel like could help me a little more.  And from what i have read the G series (G10 or G15 more than likely with my budget) and the AP1 710s seem to be very good sets and will be a little more forgiving on the mishits than my VR Pro Cavities


Posted

yea i guess i could wait and play mine a little longer until something better comes along or i can sell mine towards a newer set...i dont hate the Nikes i just feel like i have gotten a little better and i see people playing other irons that i feel like could help me a little more.  And from what i have read the G series (G10 or G15 more than likely with my budget) and the AP1 710s seem to be very good sets and will be a little more forgiving on the mishits than my VR Pro Cavities


If you are improving, taking lessons, etc, I'd go Ping. They are indestructible and typically maintain some resale value.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yea i still have not decided...i really would like to hear from someone that still plays the G10s...is it worth going back a couple years for..i mean would i notice a difference in the Nike VRs to the Pings?  i dont have to have the latest and greatest, i just want to get a swing down and stick to it and maybe in a few years upgrade to something nicer but was thinking the G10s may give me a little more ball striking confidence.


Note: This thread is 3804 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.