Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Why RE/MAX World Long Drive Champions hit it so far! [Video]


Note: This thread is 3698 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted (edited)

Why RE/MAX World Long Drive Champions hit it so far!

1) Lift Lead Heel In Backswing
2) Hands High
3) Vertical Jump in Downswing

PGA tour pro average rotation speed - 900 degrees/sec. Long drive competitor - 1300 d/s

Most of you probably know the three points mentioned, but nonetheless, an interesting video mostly due to the slow motion segments. If a picture is worth 1,000 words, a video is worth a novel. Learned what blackout means w/resp. to pressure plates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_GLBg74Ckw

 

Edited by nevets88

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Fascinating that they can run 3 tests on the these guys and accurately predict their max ball speed (so they say):

  1. Seated chest pass of medicine ball
  2. Lie on back and sit up to throw medicine ball
  3. Vertical jump

I'd imagine max ball speeds are somewhat similar so who knows what correlation they're seeing. But if they can do this over a wide cross-section of people with a wide variety of ball speeds, then that would certainly indicate these tests are critical skills in hitting the ball long.

I'm interested in the idea of the vertical jump on the downswing, as I know I'm very flat. I think more about pressing down on my left foot to get weight forward than I think about going airborne! My assumption is that the vertical leap part of the long drive swing adds an element of inconsistency that may not be worth the extra distance?

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

 

Wish they revealed the formula. That's probably an industry secret though. Or take the course.

Like 0.4 * Seated Pass + 0.4 * Ball from lying down + 0.2 * vertical

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Fascinating that they can run 3 tests on the these guys and accurately predict their max ball speed (so they say):

  1. Seated chest pass of medicine ball
  2. Lie on back and sit up to throw medicine ball
  3. Vertical jump

I'd imagine max ball speeds are somewhat similar so who knows what correlation they're seeing. But if they can do this over a wide cross-section of people with a wide variety of ball speeds, then that would certainly indicate these tests are critical skills in hitting the ball long.

I'm interested in the idea of the vertical jump on the downswing, as I know I'm very flat. I think more about pressing down on my left foot to get weight forward than I think about going airborne! My assumption is that the vertical leap part of the long drive swing adds an element of inconsistency that may not be worth the extra distance?

Interesting vid.

A lass I know at my club who plays off scratch is little but doesn't half hit the ball a long way. Photo of her through impact is below:

Training I do that helps with driving isn't all that different to when I used to compete at javlin and discus (other than the intensity right now - early days). Yes there's arm stuff in there but there are a lot more squats and core stuff. I was always taught you have to build strength from the core outwards when training for a dynamic sport. There's no point in having really strong arms if your core can't support that strength. Dynamic balance is equally important.

image.png

Edited by Nosevi

Pete Iveson

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Old school version (probably slightly more 'controlled' / in balance):

 

Mac Smith - Top.PNG Mac Smith - Post Impact.PNG

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Note: This thread is 3698 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.