Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3734 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'd like to know how much your swing tempo can tell what kind of flex you should use.

I have a fairly quick clubhead speed with my driver: 116-122 mph and a slow tempo: 27/9 (at 30fps 27 frames backswing 9 frames downswing)

I never saw the difference in how well I hit the ball with the driver wether it's X-Stiff, Stiff, Regular... Even tried ladies flex and with it I feel like I have the best feel and control over the ball. (Always felt I was an Hickory type of swinger) 

I'm very confused. I heard the story about Couples putting O'Meara's wife wood in is bag after hitting it on the range. Nicklaus played and "extra-whippy" driver for a very long time.  

When I look at my swing on video with regular flex I barely see any bending in the shaft. 

If there's a clubfitter around, I'd like to know his take on this. 


Posted

A couple of things you can do to get more specific information:

  • Hit drives on a launch monitor with someone around who can help you interpret the data.
  • See if you can hit some shots with the Mizuno Shaft Optimizer device. It will give you your swing DNA - 5 data points about your swing characteristics. One point is transition (at top). People with quick transition normally need a stiffer shaft than someone with slow transition.
    • Plus, ShaftO will give you a short list of shafts that likely would work for you in irons.

As for super whippy shafts, players in the early 1900s sometimes used super-flexible shafts in their clubs, especially longer clubs. In Golf My Way, Nicklaus (p. 59) describes how you needed a very slow, smooth swing to use these buggy whip shafts, but you could "hit it a mile" if you got the tempo mastered. (BTW, Nicklaus also said he had never used a buggy whip, but had tried a super stiff telephone pole shaft to keep tee shots low during British Open play.)

Super flexible shafts will give more distance - sometimes - but may cause you control problems. I tried out Ping G25s with both R-flex steel and senior-flex graphite shafts. On 7 iron shots, the senior flex went from 135 to 155 yds. The R-flex went from 140 to 150 yds., and had less linear dispersion (left and right of target line).

Let us know what happens.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'd like to know how much your swing tempo can tell what kind of flex you should use.

Depends on the make and model of the golf shaft. You can find a very stiff overall for the whole model type and that could be above the x-stiff another make and model. 

There is no industry standard for shaft flex. Really it only pertains to the exact make and model of the club you are trying out. Even then it can get tricky because some shaft makers change the bend profile of the same make and model.

I have a fairly quick clubhead speed with my driver: 116-122 mph and a slow tempo: 27/9 (at 30fps 27 frames backswing 9 frames downswing)

3/1 tempo is pretty much ideal. There is some studies done on golf tempo. Most PGA Tour players are around the 3/1 range. I think what is more important is how quickly you transition and how hard you leverage the club in transition.

Fujikura defines it as loading the club. I think most people who swing fast tend to have a medium to strong loading of the club. Though some people can have tremendous lag and not hit the ball as far as others. 

 Load.thumb.JPG.8c68a65a0b7b1ea8a5c7abce8


 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)


Fujikura defines it as loading the club. I think most people who swing fast tend to have a medium to strong loading of the club. Though some people can have tremendous lag and not hit the ball as far as others. 

I don't get the illustration by fujikura, it's super early release vs early release vs very delayed release. If your in position 1 or 2... don't buy a new club... get lessons. 

I always thought the loading of the shaft is the amount the shaft bends in your downswing (at transition) like Sergio Garcia he has a very quick transition with a change of club path, his swing gets really steep on the downswing. I can see why he would need a X-Stiff or X-X-Stiff.

But someone like me with a downswing with passive hands and a rather smooth and linear transition doesn't get that "loading" or "bending" of the shaft even with regular stock shafts.

  • See if you can hit some shots with the Mizuno Shaft Optimizer device. It will give you your swing DNA - 5 data points about your swing characteristics. One point is transition (at top). People with quick transition normally need a stiffer shaft than someone with slow transition.
    • Plus, ShaftO will give you a short list of shafts that likely would work for you in irons.

 

Thx for the tip! I'll try that. 

But I have a feeling that I'll all come down to feel, I just find it hard to buy a golf set with specs my way by feel when common knowledge would say it's not right for me. 

 

Edited by ygmondoux

Posted

... Thx for the tip! I'll try that. 

But I have a feeling that I'll all come down to feel, I just find it hard to buy a golf set with specs my way by feel when common knowledge would say it's not right for me. ...

 For final decision, yes. When I've been fitted by a good fitter, the fitter will tell me "the numbers say X and Y are the closest fit for you." Then, it's up to me to make the final call by what feels, and looks, best.

Years ago a driver test came down to a Callaway HyperX Tour and a Cleveland HiBore XLS. I went with Callaway because it "fit my eye better." - It was easier to line up. I played it well for three years.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3734 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.