Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3637 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Been back in golf a few years after taking 20+ away. I've noticed one trend in the newer technology is the longer shaft lengths on everything. I recently measured a set of Wilson WS1000's from 1986 and came away surprised. The driver is 43", 3-wood 42", 5-wood 41.5", 3-iron 38.5", with the rest of the irons decreasing at .5" increments. I recently began cutting all my modern drivers down to 44.5" and have much better dispersion and distance. I use 25 gram grips to get the feel I like, which puts the SW at D8. I'm considering cutting down some Wishon woods I have to those older specs and adding tip weights and lead to up the swingweights on those also. May even cut down a set of Snake Eye irons to older specs and lead the snot out of those to get higher SW's. My thinking is, because of all this new modern tech with lighter and longer shafts, I'm losing distance and direction because the new stuff is too long and I can't hardly feel the head weights, thereby throwing my swing out of whack...................does this make any sense to anyone but me?


  • Moderator
Posted
6 hours ago, Jeff Tilley said:

Been back in golf a few years after taking 20+ away. I've noticed one trend in the newer technology is the longer shaft lengths on everything. I recently measured a set of Wilson WS1000's from 1986 and came away surprised. The driver is 43", 3-wood 42", 5-wood 41.5", 3-iron 38.5", with the rest of the irons decreasing at .5" increments. I recently began cutting all my modern drivers down to 44.5" and have much better dispersion and distance. I use 25 gram grips to get the feel I like, which puts the SW at D8. I'm considering cutting down some Wishon woods I have to those older specs and adding tip weights and lead to up the swingweights on those also. May even cut down a set of Snake Eye irons to older specs and lead the snot out of those to get higher SW's. My thinking is, because of all this new modern tech with lighter and longer shafts, I'm losing distance and direction because the new stuff is too long and I can't hardly feel the head weights, thereby throwing my swing out of whack...................does this make any sense to anyone but me?

Club designs have changed so much over the decades, it is hard to compare. The launch of the heads are different now and there is a lot more research going into shaft design for the heads. If you cut down shafts, make sure to have the lie adjusted to match and to fit your swing.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think this is more applicable to drivers and possibly longer fairway woods than with irons.  Most of us will benefit from less length and more loft in our tee club.

The modern irons are longer, but also have less loft, so today's 5 iron is really a 1986 3 iron with a larger face. Considering that the modern irons are designed with a weight, length, shaft to work together, I think you would do more harm than good by altering them as you described. Just get them fitted properly from the outset.

Hybrids have been around a while, but have not changed as much with respect to loft and length.

If you want the old-school feel, play old-school stuff like I do. Works fine with ProV1's.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ok, those Snake Eyes irons came in today and they specked out .5" shorter than standard, D3D4 SW, and almost perfect lie angle for me. I hit 'em well and mostly centered. I got them home and added enuff lead to get them up to D6D7. I also had those Wishon woods shortened and had the 25 gram grips installed. They came in at D1 and D2 so I added lead to those, putting the driver at E0, and the fairways and hybrid to D7. I also raised my Cleveland 54 up to D7. Was wanting to take it to D9 along with my 58, but ran outta lead. Can't wait to try these out next Tuesday weather permitting.


  • Moderator
Posted
14 hours ago, Jeff Tilley said:

Ok, those Snake Eyes irons came in today and they specked out .5" shorter than standard, D3D4 SW, and almost perfect lie angle for me. I hit 'em well and mostly centered. I got them home and added enuff lead to get them up to D6D7. I also had those Wishon woods shortened and had the 25 gram grips installed. They came in at D1 and D2 so I added lead to those, putting the driver at E0, and the fairways and hybrid to D7. I also raised my Cleveland 54 up to D7. Was wanting to take it to D9 along with my 58, but ran outta lead. Can't wait to try these out next Tuesday weather permitting.

Let us know your results.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well it was a mixed bag of results today. The driver was actually pretty good. I was hitting most everything down the middle with it. Seemed to have less yardage than normal, but it was kinda cold and very wet, so no rollout. On the last hole I removed the lead which put the driver back to D1 and I hit 2 balls and it was ugly. It felt like I was losing control of the head and felt like I was overswinging. The fairway woods were a hot mess with and without lead. I've never been able to hit those 949s well. The hybrid had a pronounced fade with the lead and just a baby fade without it. The wedges were better without the lead. I was hitting the irons both fat and thin til I removed the lead, then I went pin hunting. I'm not a big fan of those Nippon 1150 shafts, they feel harsh to me. I may end up installing shaft inserts or just going with graphite. I have a set of Adams CB2 irons with Xcaliber 85 gram shafts and just love the ball flight and the feel. I read somewhere that Robin Arthur is coming out with some new shafts soon and I hope he's gonna have some 105 or 115 gram iron shafts similar to the 85's. I know he has the Tour X, but I have some Steelfibers in a set of Callaway Apex and those are so-so to me. Those original Xcaliber 85's are awesome. So, for now I'll keep tinkering with the Snake Eye irons and will probably put my 44.5" R1 driver and Stage 2 woods back in the bag. I think going shorter with the irons worked well, the woods not so much.


Posted

Unfortunately, I think part of this is marketing. When testing clubs if you catch it right with a longer club an avid golfer is likely to remember that shot vs. the mishits with the 'unfamiliar' club and buy based on that 'good shot' potential that is probably an illusion due to the decreased consistency you are likely to have with a longer shaft.

Part of it is probably fair in that average heights are greater today due to better nutrition and overall health.

Kevin


Posted

I agree. Still probably best to get fit by a qualified clubfitter if a person can afford it vs. buying off the rack.

And take lessons, lol.


Note: This thread is 3637 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.