Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3541 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

How important is it to have the club in a 'good position' at parallel point 1 i.e. 1st point shaft is parallel to ground in backswing.

I know ideally the club would be a little outside the hands and the face matching the spine angle. I'm not a million miles away from this but as you can see my arms have come away from my body slightly, the club is a touch open and slightly behind my hands. But the top of my backswing is pretty decent. Club neutral, parallel to target line.

Thing is my coach has got me working on these exaggerated feelings of club outside hands, hinging up much more vertically and getting way more laid off at the top. Admittedly these are all 'feelings' and when I actually do them whilst hitting a ball I've actually only moved the club a tiny bit closer to the 'better' positions. 

But I honestly feel so awkward and horrible doing them. It just makes me hit it so much worse and come down very steep on the ball. I've always enjoyed the flatter more baseball like feeling in my golf swing. I feel like my arms are trapped against my chest in the backswing and I cant rotate properly. My coach says changes like this are always tough and will feel horrible for a while, but I've made positional changes in the past and yes they've felt odd at first, but I've usually been able to adapt to them pretty quickly and my swing has improved quickly as a result. But these changes he's trying to make to my backswing have been going on for a while now and every time I focus on implementing them, whether it be on the range or during a round, my ball striking deteriorates.

Im a 7.0 hcap and improving, but he says if I want to reach a more elite level I need to bite the bullet and make these changes to my swing.

Thoughts? 

Screen Shot 2016-03-27 at 16.02.17.png

Screen Shot 2016-03-27 at 16.04.27.png


  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, golfaddict1 said:

How important is it to have the club in a 'good position' at parallel point 1 i.e. 1st point shaft is parallel to ground in backswing.

It's probably the least important position in the golf swing. There are great players that are well inside the hands and other that are way outside.

Having said that it can be an important position for some players because loading the club low and in can create a "domino" effect with the rest of the swing. The change typically isn't to fix the position but why it's occurring. 

2 hours ago, golfaddict1 said:

I know ideally the club would be a little outside the hands and the face matching the spine angle. I'm not a million miles away from this but as you can see my arms have come away from my body slightly, the club is a touch open and slightly behind my hands. But the top of my backswing is pretty decent. Club neutral, parallel to target line.

It looks fine to me, agree with the changes if you wanted to make it "perfect" but you reach a really nice position at the top.

One thing that stands out to me is that you look like you have some weight back into your heels. To fix that I'd look at getting the arch out of your lower back.

 

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

thanks for the response. I agree I think the position at the top is far more important than how you get there. I've always felt the weight was in the balls of my feet at address so maybe i'm falling back at touch during BS. You're right about the arch. I have pretty weak core muscles and I need to engage them more at address.


  • Administrator
Posted

FWIW I renamed the thread to say A2 instead of "PP1" (which would be "pressure point 1").

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3541 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.