Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7620 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I am currently in the market for a new set of irons. Is there really a big difference between name brand and non-name brand sets. I was originally looking at lower end clubs ($200-400) of the name brands, but have come across some other brands like acer, oxygen, and turbo which are supposed to compare to the higher end name brand clubs, but are a small fraction of the price.

Specifically I am looking at the Acer XP Hollow Core Beta Titanium Irons which are suppose to compare to the Callaway Fusion's, and also other Acer clubs which compare to the X-18's and X-16's.

All of the reviews of the acer clubs that I have read online said that they are just as good or even better than the callaways - better distance, accuracy, feel etc.

Does anyone have any personal experience with non-name brands and how they compare to the name brands?

Is there anything specific that I should be careful of with the non-name brands?

Any ideas of where I could get a hold of the acer clubs to take them out for some swings?

Any advice would be appreciated......

Thanks.

Posted
I have hit KZG, Peerless, and Wishon just to name a few. I wouldn't say they are non-name brands but they aren't as well known as say Titleist. They play about the same as the popular brands. I've never had any experience with Acer but if they are "knock-offs" I would steer clear of them.

Posted
I agree, stay away from the knock offs. If its just not a wellknown company they should be fine. But you wont get the same performance from a knock off of the X-18's or X-16's as you would by actually getting the X-18's or X-16's, there is a reason that those clubs are expensive. Remember, you get what you pay for.

In the Bag:

Wilson Fat Boy Driver
Callaway Steelhead 3 & 5 Wood (Steel Shaft)
3 & 5-SW Callaway X-1452 degree WedgeAdams Golf 60 Degree WedgePing B60 PutterOther Optional Clubs:Callaway Steelhead 1 WoodCleveland 60 degree wedgeAdams Golf 56 Degree WedgesWilson Blackjack PutterBall: ...


Posted
Thanks for the advice. I guess my next question would be what qualifies a set of irons as knock off as opposed to a not known name brand? Is there anything specific to look for that would indicate low quality, or certain features of the club that makes them a better club?

Thanks again.......

Posted
Thanks for the advice. I guess my next question would be what qualifies a set of irons as knock off as opposed to a not known name brand? Is there anything specific to look for that would indicate low quality, or certain features of the club that makes them a better club?

IMHO it's not that black and white. If you're not too serious about the game, starting up or playing once a month - I don't see a reason going for the big names - most likely you won't feel and notice the difference. Once you really get into it there is no doubt - the quality assurance is much, much higher. The idea is, that if you hit the ball with the same swing - you'll get the same result. If you have not-so-good-equipment - a slight difference in the surface of the clubface, shaft quality etc - might cause a few yards difference.

It's hard to point out "what to look for". Definitely take it out to the range before buying - if it feels good and preforms well for you - go with it.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
...what qualifies a set of irons as knock off as opposed to a not known name brand? ...

Usually knockoff's look like the original (illegal trade name violation), but are made out of cheaper material and don't preform as well as the original (i.e. if a "real" driver has 0.83 COR the copy might have only 0.4 etc.). With the advancement of technology in China and Taiwan there are knockoffs on the market, that only an expert can identify. Bottom line is stay away from "shady" sellers, if someone offers you a brand new set of Callaway X-18's for $200 - it's trouble. Other category is clubs labeled as "Callawy" or "Tilor Made" etc. These are kind of legal, but hope to fool a buyer into thinking he/she is buying the real thing. I'd stay away from both.

Non-brand names don't try to imitate the big dogs, sometimes they use the same design elements, but they have clearly identified manufacturer and logo. You can find some real gems (not always cheap) sometimes, after all every company had to start somewhere - just look at sonartec as a most recent example of no-name becoming a big-name...
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 7620 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Foundation Session #2  
    • I shot an 85 yesterday without any shots that really stood out as spectacular to me.  On the first nine, the highest SG shots that didn't originate on a tee were a 22 yard chip from the rough to 6' and sinking a 10' putt (not the same hole).   On the second nine, driver 4-hybrid to 17' on a 421 yard par-4 was pretty cool.  Sinking a 15' putt for par on the 420-yard par-4 15th was my largest SG of the day (0.98 vs 10 hcp), and that one goes on my acting resume because when it went in, I acted like I wasn't surprised I made the putt.   I'm a lot happier with that round than this post indicates.  It shows I can play to a pretty good score (a 10-11 handicap shooting 85 on a 70.9 / 125 / 6400 yard is a good performance I think) without having to work miracles. 
    • Shot an 85 yesterday (posts as an 84).  40 first nine, 45 second nine.  Only two holes worse than bogey:  a double on a par-4 and a totally preventable snowman on the par-5 18th (the one where Arnold Palmer once made a 12 during the L.A. Open). Bogeyed every par-3.  Par-5s were 6-6-8 (there are only three).  Lots of work to improve upon these.  Especially performance on 18: wild tee shot, great recovery, good third I thought, but it somehow drew against a left-to-right wind and finished barely in bounds, where all I could do is smack with a putter towards the green.  And I did, leaving it in the rough for my fifth.  Chip way past the hole, putt 5' past the cup, a miss, and a tap in to complete the snowman.  Played the par-4s in a cumulative 5-over (there are eleven), one of which was a double.  Strokes gained: par-4s during the round gains 2.16 over the 5-handicap baseline, that's pretty cool. No birdies.  Only 5 GIR, 7 near-GIR, and one green hit on a full swing that wasn't for GIR (par-4 9th, drive, recovery, sand wedge to the green).
    • I played this course yesterday (casual friendly round, not a tournament) with friends.  I told my playing partners up front I was going to try a second approach shot on #7, the hole I was describing.   I hit my tee shot to where I had 130 or so yards to the green from the fairway (per ShotScope GPS and also laser to a pin near the middle).  There was a decent wind in my face. If we hadn't had this conversation, I would have hit 7-iron (140 yard average under calm and flat conditions).   I played that shot, full normal swing, hit the green 24' short of the pin, made an easy two putt for a par.   My second attempt at the approach shot (which I hit right after my main one) was a 5-iron, using the swing I usually use to hit a 100-yard low shot (I'm not sure if it qualifies as a punch shot) where I'm trying to hit it straight and low, such as if I'm behind trees and attempting a recovery-and-advance.  I hit it decently well and the ball finished at the back of the green.  Incidentally, I've recently started a notebook for this course.  Somehow I don't have a lot written down despite having played this course semi-regularly for almost two decades (minus the times I'm not playing golf, of course).  I added that to my notes for this particular hole.  Next few casual rounds there, I think I'm going to hit an additional approach to that green with different clubs on the low shot and take notes.  It's a small sample size but it seems worth knowing instead of having to guess during an important round. As my handicap edges closer to single digits, I think it's good to have shots like this in the repertoire -- not only mechanically, but knowing situationally what I can do.  I recognize that the really good players tend to hit their stock shot on the vast majority of occasions, and I'm not about to try to shoehorn in punch shots everywhere, but knowing options into the wind and/or to a lowered green beyond "take more (or less) club" seems like a good thing.
    • Wordle 1,806 2/6 🟩🟨⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.