Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Euro Tour events vs. PGA tour events


Note: This thread is 3443 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Most of the players that I follow regularly play on the PGA tour 99 percent of the time but I find more enjoyment watching the European Tour events more so than PGA tour events (excluding majors.) 

Not sure of my reasoning but I seem to like the course layouts better and the commentary I find way more enjoyable. 

 

Sorry if this isn't directly related to a specific even, I just wanted to see if anyone else felt the same. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

We have some good early morning coverage of some European Tour events on Golf Channel. For me, it's a timing thing. Nice to get up and put on some relaxed coverage while I drink some coffee. The commentators are part of the morning relaxation. The competition is usually good, and the scenery/course is quite nice. What a great way to start the day.

The PGA coverage is a totally different beast. Late afternoon. The busy day has mostly gone on, there's still things we usually need to get done before dark, and it's time to eat dinner soon. The style of coverage is more commercial somehow, as it's usually a major network. There's usually more on the line for the players, and the events seem bigger (and the players are typically the bigger names in golf).

The whole feel of each event is nearly polar opposite, so each has its place, I suppose. Both are great.

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

When I did watch TV golf, I always thought  the Europeans did a better job.. There was more golf shown, (fewer commercials) and the commentary seemed better. I always thought commentators were more in the back ground, and didn't require a lot of on camera face time to do their job. They seemed to whisper which gave the viewer a sense of actually being at the tournament. 

Edited by Patch
  • Upvote 3

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 hours ago, Patch said:

When I did watch TV golf, I always thought  the Europeans did a better job.. There was more golf shown, (fewer commercials) and the commentary seemed better. I always thought commentators were more in the back ground, and didn't require a lot of on camera face time to do their job. They seemed to whisper which gave the viewer a sense of actually being at the tournament. 

 

That last sentence I hadn't even thought about but makes sense. I was watching the open on the way to work this morning and it was great 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3443 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.