Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3412 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
57 minutes ago, Braivo said:

Ahead of the DNC even liberal leaning polls are showing Trump pulling ahead. Those Bernie supporters are really throwing a wrench in the DNC.

Even Nate Silver, who has been wrong this entire election cycle, is putting the odds in favor of Trump. 

 

I do not feel that if the election were today Trump would win. I do not feel that the average American feels that Trump would win if the election were today!
And what I said is also a fact!

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
8 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

That's why all stats are crap.  I can use a set of numbers to say whatever I want them too.  We don't know why he used July - July, but it certainly isn't a lie to use those stats versus annual stats.  In some cases July - July is a more current representation.  

I am not saying his stat is wrong. It's not. It can not be compared with the FBI data base which used clearly defined dates for their data. 

When comparing stats, how the stats are constrained is very important. 

If I do a traffic safety study, I can't compare a year total from July to July and compare it to January to December. The reason being, I will be doubling up on the data. July 2015 to July 2016 would include data from a data set from just the year of 2015 alone (January thru December). 

I could look at July to July as one data point to make one claim, as Trump did. It doesn't define a trend on what is happening. It doesn't give any relevant data or points to a direction of causality. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

I am not saying his stat is wrong. It's not. It can not be compared with the FBI data base which used clearly defined dates for their data. 

When comparing stats, how the stats are constrained is very important. 

If I do a traffic safety study, I can't compare a year total from July to July and compare it to January to December. The reason being, I will be doubling up on the data. July 2015 to July 2016 would include data from a data set from just the year of 2015 alone (January thru December). 

I could look at July to July as one data point to make one claim, as Trump did. It doesn't define a trend on what is happening. It doesn't give any relevant data or points to a direction of causality. 

 

I am pretty sure they were talking about trends but I understand your point. 

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Regardless of who gets the election, IMO, we the people are screwed either way....................

Hate crowned cups.


Note: This thread is 3412 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 430 - 2025-12-04 Slow motion backswings (with chippy shots) with AlmostGolf balls.
    • Day 24 (4 Dec 25) - Spent about an hour working with the new 55° wedge in the backyard.  Kept all shots to under 20yds.  Big focus - not decelerating thru downswing and keeping speed up with abbreviated backswing.  Nothing like hitting a low flighted chip with plenty of check spin and then purpose to float a pitch of similar distance.  
    • Day 114 12-4 Put some work in on backswing, moving the hips correctly, then feeling over to lead side. Didn't hit any balls was just focused on keeping flowy and moving better. I'll probably do another session tonight and add in some foam balls.
    • Didn't say anything about your understanding in my post.  Well, if you are not insisting on alignment with logic of the WHS, then no.  Try me/us. What do you want from us then?? You are not making sense. You come here and post in an open forum, question a system that is constructed with logic, without using any of your own and then give us a small window of your personal experience to support your narrative which at first sight does not makes sense.  I mean, if you are a point of swearing then I would suggest you cut your losses and humor a more gullible audience elsewhere. Good heavens.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.