Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3410 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, onthehunt526 said:

Component Companies did, back in the early 1990s. To take advantage of the "features" of a product, and sell it at 1/3 of the price to reach more golfers.  Component Companies do it now, but that's definitely :offtopic:. If you want a more definitive answer PM me sometime.

I get that but those knock offs generally would changed the name slightly and these were not widely known in general.

2 hours ago, pganapathy said:

Any knock off is made because you are hoping to be able to sell it for more than you could under your own XYZ brand that nobody has heard of.  Any brand with some market value will see knock offs if it is profitable to do so

Yes for like Ping, Titleist but was Tommy Armour comparable?

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, Valleygolfer said:

Yes for like Ping, Titleist but was Tommy Armour comparable?

Provided you can sell it for more than your own unknown XYZ brand, it is worth while.  Plus, companies like Ping and Titleist are more stringent on checking for and punishing fake manufacturers.  Similar to the luxury goods manufacturers today.  Tommy Armour not so much.  Less risk and correspondingly less reward

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Tour 900 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I did a little searching around for some archive pics and info on his old clubs and all of them seem to have silver scot, oversized or titanium on them.  It is quite possible the ones you have are fakes.

Driver: :callaway: Diablo
Woods: :callaway: Big Bertha 2 & 4
Irons: Miura MC 102's 3 - PW & Mizuno MP 67's 3 - W
Wedges: :mizuno: MP-R12 52* & 58*
Putters: :ping: WRX Ti4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 hours ago, Valleygolfer said:

Why would anyone waste time making knock offs of Tommy Armour 845s?

The only reason I can think of is the titanium. From what I've researched, the 845 Ti irons were expensive when they first were released. 

2 hours ago, Vinny Cap said:

I did a little searching around for some archive pics and info on his old clubs and all of them seem to have silver scot, oversized or titanium on them.  It is quite possible the ones you have are fakes.

That is exactly what made me suspicious. The overall look of the club, the missing "Silver Scot."


Note: This thread is 3410 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.