Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3257 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, Rainmaker said:

Interesting observation .  . my teacher is a man of few words . . for example, he'll say "keep your left knee bent longer" . .and then I could literally write a thousand words, maybe draw a few diagrams,  about what that means to me, lol.   

Well . .the other thing he said on that lesson was "keep your hands closer", referring to my hands at and past impact.  

What I've noticed for me, though . .is I can't do any of this directly.  I can't "keep my left knee bent longer"...I can't "keep my hands closer".  These things feel arbitrary.  I have to find the right mental picture that makes these things happen.  Give them some context.  My teacher says the biggest obstacle to learning golf is "what we think we're doing is not what we're doing" . .but, for me, there's an awful lot of "what I think I saw, I didn't see" . .so I'm trying to do the wrong thing . .and then probably also not doing what I think I'm doing, lol.  

Communication of individual perceptions and feels is one of the very challenging elements of learning/understanding golf. There's a sports science study that talks about athletes having internal vs. external focuses. An internal focus would be on hand path and an external focus would be on the path of the clubhead.

Now imagine a teacher conveying his external focus on the clubhead 'swinging to right field' through the ball to an internal focused student trying to figure out how to consciously accomplish this. The student interprets swing to right field as an action of the hands, but that's not what the teacher is visualizing. An intent to swing toward right field and trying to hit a ball hard to right field likely create very different motions. Precision in language and lack of understanding of differing perspectives creates a breakdown.

Maybe be bold in asking more specific questions of your teacher of few words to get him to explain how he accomplishes what he's asking you to do or what he feels as a mistake when he doesn't do it well?

FWIW here's the image from Steven Nesbit's modeling study on different hand paths showing the opposite curvature / radius at the same points.

Nesb_handPath.gif

Here's the link to the full page: https://www.tutelman.com/golf/swing/models4.php

And here are some vids with possibly different 'word pictures' related to the subject:

 

 

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


  • Moderator
Posted

Don't consciously try to resist with the trail knee, allow the trail hip to turn back and around. Can even let the lead heel come off the ground (more as an effect of the lead knee turning/flexing inward).

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3257 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.