Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3195 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I come from an equipment background, so these myths/misinformation are equipment related and the ones I have heard the most:

1. Graphite shafts are too "whippy".

If I had a nickel for every time I heard: "when my hands are here, the clubhead is way back here" when a player was explaining why he thought he couldn't hit a driver, I would be a wealthy man.  The truth is that graphite shafts are every bit as stiff as steel shafts, but they are of course lighter. Players are often under the impression the graphite "can't keep up with their swing", but the real issue is the club is too light for them to feel.

2. A higher spinning golf ball will help me score better.

There is an obsession with spin...everyone wants more spin because they can "control it better" or they want to "throw the ball right at the hole" and they think high spin is the answer.  For most mid to high handicappers (around 15 and up), high spin golf balls can cost a player more shots than it saves them.

3. A shorter driver shaft will cost me distance

Day-in and day-out, most players will not only hit a shorter driver more accurately, but they might hit it as far or farther than a longer shaft!  The majority of golfers have an early release (some more than others) which will result in a longer shaft actually slowing down at impact.  A shorter shaft also makes it easier to hit the ball on the screws more often, and when that happens, everything gets better.

4.  I'm not good enough for the golf ball to matter.

Actually, mid to high handicappers will have more dramatic results than low handicappers and pros.  The ball won't prevent you from hitting a bad shot, but the ball can either minimize a bad shot or exaggerate a bad shot.

5. A low compression ball (40, 50, 60 compression) will feel like a marshmallow  

This is usually the thought when guys are still thinking about the old 90 and 100 compression models from 25-30 years ago, and comparing to the modern ball.  Today's golf balls cannot be compared to the old wound ball in terms of compression...totally different animals.

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3195 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.