Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Are most people exagerating their long drive exploits


Note: This thread is 6510 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
This is what we read all the time and it really makes no sense to me at all. To drive the ball 250 into play puts you about a 7 iron or less in on most holes. On the par 5s and short 4s its really a wedge. If someone has the athleticism to hit a drive that well which requires a lot of timing and balance, it just seems odd they cannot hit a wedge on the green and knock the ball in the hole in two putts most of the time thus yielding a single digit handicap. In a word something is amiss and I suspect its the average driving distance into play.

It's a completely different activity for an athlete to hit a ball sitting up on a tee with a huge clubhead, vs. hitting a ball with a small iron head that's sitting on the ground. Hell, I'm an 8 handicap, and I've bombed a drive only to completely push/thin a wedge into a bunker and make bogey. Plus, that 15 who occasionally hits that long drive also very occasionally mishits one entirely or bombs it into the trees/lake/hazard. Not to mention, even if that 15 manages to go fairway to green, let's not forget our friend 3-putt.

I have a friend, little guy, decently in shape, pretty unsound swing, doesn't play much, rarely breaks 100. I've personally seen him tattoo a drive, dead down the middle, long. It happens.

Nothing in the swing is done at the expense of balance.


Posted
I'm one of the longest at our club, in the junior section. I hit the ball about 220. However, I can never do the consistently. If I could, I would be a whole lot better player. Instead I just hit irons off the tee most of the time, and that does okay for me. I just need the confidence in the driver. However, I am made feel such a small hitter, by some people who say they hit it 300+ consistently, bang down the centre.

Posted
I think that the conclusion that we can all draw from this is that we've discovered a secret to hitting the long ball... this could be the next revolution in golf instruction: posting on the internet.

I can't wait to see Tiger, Phil, Rory and all those guys forgetting the gym and just chilling on their laptops before teeing off.

If you spend a day at a golf course you'll probably see a few 300+ yard drives out of the thousands of drives all day. However, you spend a day on an online forum in a discussion with 50 ppl and you see dozens and dozens of golfers who hit it 300+! The data speaks for itself.

Posted
I think that the conclusion that we can all draw from this is that we've discovered a secret to hitting the long ball... this could be the next revolution in golf instruction: posting on the internet.

Virtual Reality?

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Posted
I think that the conclusion that we can all draw from this is that we've discovered a secret to hitting the long ball... this could be the next revolution in golf instruction: posting on the internet.

Or go to the driving range. 7 or 8 out of 10 people are wacking their driver, doing what I call "speed practice." I'm sure you've seen it. Grab a ball, tee up, hit it with a driver, ball has not even landed and they are already teeing up.

Titleist 905T Accra SC75 M4 Shaft

Nike SQ 4W Accra T70 M4 Shaft
HB001 17* Hybrid with Mitsubishi Diamana Thump X Stiff Flex
Baffler Pro 20* Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Taylor Made 24* Burner Accra Axiv 105 Tour Hybrid Shaft

Mizuno MP-32 5-PW Black Oxide Finish Project X 6.0 Shafts

Vokey 52* Oil Can Finish TTDG S400 Shaft

Cleveland 588 60* TTDG S400 Shaft

Rife Bimini Blade Putter

 

Ball-White and Round

 


Posted
Is it really that outrageous to believe that people on a GOLFing forum actually know how to hit a ball half way descent. Its not like people are saying that fly the ball 300 + yds on a constant basis.

With the technology thats out today, its not uncommon to see a few people who can hit 280 +, but the people saying on a mis-hit the still hit the ball 260. If I have a mis-hit on a drive it will go 225 and another 100 to the right.
In My Bridgestone Stand Bag:

Driver: TM r7 425 TP (8.5*) Stiff
Wood: TM Ti 5 Wood (18*) Stiff
Irons: TM r7 TP Irons (3-PW) RegularGW LW: TM rac Satin TPs ( 52* 56* 60*)Putter: TM Rossa Monza Spider Balls: Bridgestone B330s

Posted
Is it really that outrageous to believe that people on a GOLFing forum actually know how to hit a ball half way descent. Its not like people are saying that fly the ball 300 + yds on a constant basis.

Uh, I believe I said 250, not 260 (that would be crazy).

LOL!! (I was being a little facetious....a little. I've (or rather technology has) hit them a little off the sweetspot on the toe side and still got that kind of distance. I'm sure the other big dogs, who jack a normally struck tee shot over 280, do the same. It's just something we have to live with.).

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Posted
First of all, I think a lot of people confuse carry with distance. I swing about 105, use an r5 draw with stiff prolaunch blue, and my carry is 260, with the ball rolling to about 280. I think you should be sure to include both measurements, but carry to me is the more telling stat.

Also, some people think that their best drives represent how far they hit their driver. If I really go after it, I can carry 280 (and have hit greens 280 yards away with a tee shot), but thats not how far I would say I "hit my driver". With my most reliable full swing, i "hit my driver" 260.

And the longest drive for me was 400 yards... It was in the altitude of Utah off the side of a mountain with a 30+ mph win at my back... just missed hitting the green 415 yards away... pretty awesome.
Bag: Flight SS
Driver: 10.5* r5 draw with Pro Launch blue 65 Stiff
Irons: CCi Forged 3i-pw
Wedges: 56* CG12 black pearl and 60* low bounce RTG 900
Putter: i-Series Anser 35"Ball: e5+Tee: Zero FrictionGlove: FootJoy WeatherSofRangefinder: MedalistShoes: Sp-6 II, Adidas 360Scores this year:92 91...

Posted
In the old days we got a lot of roll from our drives thinking that was the way to go because the ball simply went farther.

These days in the time of 'optimal launch angles' it has been proven that a longer carry with less roll for more predictable tee shot placement is preferred. Of course, the type of golf course you play and the conditions should dictate what kind of drive to play.

I have a feeling that players who have difficulty launching it high and far will likely welcome roll to get them farther from the tee.

In all seriousness, I'm not trying to come off as some arrogant monster. I'm very satisfied with my driver right now. I've been playing a lot of golf lately with & against many different players. My launch angle is noticably higher with a deeper carry. The end result are drives 20-50 yards further than my competitors. I never talk smack about it. When your friends at the club start joking about me playing par 5's with driver-pitching wedge, you know you're doing something right. (No, I don't do that).

So back to the original question...sure, I would say most people exaggerate their driver exploits. It's part ego and partly because they don't have an accurate way to measure. I do give credit to the guys who say, hey I hit it 220 and I'm fine with it. We know the real fun begins at the 100 yard marker.

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Posted
We're not jealous, we're realistic.

I dont know what to tell you. Ive had a club in my hands since 10 but growing up I was a 3 sport athlete in HS which didnt include golf and I played football in college. So golf really took second fiddle growing up (re: the high handicap). Now Im 24 and getting serious about lowering my handicap since all I could do growing up was drive.

Im 6'2'' and weigh 205 with a muscular build so building momentum and swing speed isn't a problem for me. I usually just hit Top-Flite 2000's because I wasnt really into the game and just used whatever was cheap so that might be another factor in my deep hits, but it could be moot. Like I said I was at a golfers warehouse a few weeks ago and had a radar behind the ball and my consistent swing was 121 mph . I dont see how its so unconceivable that someone with my size can generate that clubhead speed. BTW the course I hit over the green was Norton Country Club at the end of last season. http://www.nortoncountryclub.com/layout/b13.html I was hitting from the whites.

Driver: G5 9 Degree w/ Aldila Green Stiff
Irons: i5 Green Dot
Wedge: 588 53 Degree
Balls: NXT Tour


Posted
I think that the conclusion that we can all draw from this is that we've discovered a secret to hitting the long ball... this could be the next revolution in golf instruction: posting on the internet.

Like I said earlier, and this post speaks volumes. I think a lot of the reason behind people calling BS on long drives stems from jealousy.

Driver: G5 9 Degree w/ Aldila Green Stiff
Irons: i5 Green Dot
Wedge: 588 53 Degree
Balls: NXT Tour


Posted
Speaking from my own experience I can happily go into a golf Sim and rip the club at 125 mph through the ball .... but with 0% chance of actually hitting the sweet spot and even less chance of ever finding the ball again were I to pull that stunt on a tee box.
So having read that you can lose up to 25 yrds of carry for every 1/2 inch you miss the sweet spot by I never go beyond 80% effort on my swing and so my impact speed is around 105 and in most cases pretty near the sweet spot. Now 105 is not slow but this never gives me any more carry than maybe 220 - 230 with a verified launch angle of approx 14 Deg.
Some one mentioned jealousy .... not me, just a realist

Posted
[QUOTE=ganjagolfer;109163]Mike Austin's record 515-yard drive has yet to be approached in thirty years. Which begs the question: Did it—could it—really happen?

ahem? mike austins record has been exceeded on several occasions - mike dobbyn recently took the record (now 551) from scott smith (539) yards.

k

Posted
my sodding driver got lost in the post and i had the pleasure of hitting my old 1980s (was state of the art) taylor made burner - wow golf was hard back then

k

Posted
I have seen three naturally long hitters in my life; two were thin, wiry guys who had a perfect swing with perfect timing; the third was a really big guy who simply crushed the ball. Back when balls were made of wound rubber bands, a crushed ball would fly like a line drive for about 50 yards then the rubber would rebound inside the ball and it would look like it had turned on an afterburner and jump another 150 yards in a straight line seemingly twice as fast, then ball would slowly climb to a peak and then fall rapidly; this is what later was called the "pro" trajectory, except now you don't see balls launched at almost zero degrees.

2007 Yamaha Cart
TaylorMade R7 460 Superquad Driver, 10.5, Reg flex (RF)
Taylormade R7 Titanium 3,5 & 7 Fairway woods RF
PING Rapture irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, graphite RF
Odyssey White Hot Two Ball putter Ping Cart Bag, Pioneer in Atomic OrangeNow playing Titleist Pro V1x balls


Note: This thread is 6510 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.