Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2388 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
1 minute ago, Pretzel said:

Yeah, I figured that it wouldn't really have much impact on the golf ball's trajectory just because clubface rotation through impact doesn't really even affect full swing shots. If it did, we'd all be swinging super low torque shafts (which, incidentally, I prefer simply because my swing isn't the most smooth and high torque shafts feel whippy to me) instead of the wide variety of torque ratings that golfers are fit into currently. We'd also all be trying to hit some kind of shot like a pull cut where you're attempting to hold off the natural rotation of the clubface through impact to minimize the effects of it.

It's also why I mentioned the gear effect, since I believed that to have a large impact on the line of the putt than the rotation of the face through impact, even if I did get it a little backwards in terms of whether it would have more or less time to act during a putt. It would be a bit interesting to see what kind of impact the gear effect has on initial starting line of a putt, since on full swings it seems to primarily affect spin (with the bulge and roll of a clubhead acting to help launch the ball opposite the direction that the gear effect spin will curve it). I know you'll lose a ton of distance on off-center putter hits, so to me it's never really mattered since I knew I'd be missing the putt anyways on distance if I missed the center of the face during the stroke.

To be clear, I think the "gear effect" is almost entirely about spin, not horizontal start direction. That, as you suggest, has more to do with bulge/roll (for horizontal and vertical gear effects).

But yes, toeing a ball with an iron (much lower MOI than a putter) doesn't change the start line by a bunch.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, iacas said:

To be clear, I think the "gear effect" is almost entirely about spin, not horizontal start direction. That, as you suggest, has more to do with bulge/roll (for horizontal and vertical gear effects).

But yes, toeing a ball with an iron (much lower MOI than a putter) doesn't change the start line by a bunch.

Yup, that's what I was trying to say. The bulge and roll just change the starting line (by change the face angle depending on where you hit the ball on the face) just attempt to compensate for the gear effect spin as a result of off-center strikes. If you toe the ball the gear effect will cause spin that makes the ball draw (even if path and face angle are identical), but the bulge will create a face angle that is effectively more open and start the ball further to the right. Because of the gear effect you can hit a draw even the face open relative to the path (good example from Trackman: https://youtu.be/IVbhEKeXKrs?t=33)

I think the bigger effect of an off center strike during a putt is that it will reduce the distance due to the energy absorbed and effectively lost when the clubhead begins to twist. It's possible that the Stability Shaft could help this, but keeping your arms and wrists very rigid as well to take advantage of this effect (combined with the loss of feel) will likely have a larger negative impact on your distance control to begin with. Most of the twisting during an off center strike happens in your wrists and arms, not the shaft, so I picture this effect being heavily minimized or disappearing altogether when a normal putting stroke with a gentle grip and relaxed arms (for improved feel and distance control on center strikes) is used even with the Stability Shaft.

I think the net effect for a player on distance control would still be negative because of the changes made to take advantage of this possibility, but I can see how on a machine it could appear to have a positive effect on off-center hits and distance control. I'd be interested in seeing testing by BGT on off-center hits and total putt distance to see if my theory holds true, as well as seeing experimental data from actual golfers making off center strikes with the putter to see if distance would be less effected on an off center strike even if you used a normal swing.

To outline and summarize my position clearly:

Spoiler

The currently available data shows that the Stability Shaft will have either no impact or slight negative impact on starting line of a putt.

I have a theory that the distance control on off-center strikes could be improved by a minute amount by the Stability Shaft due to less energy loss from the shaft itself twisting. I also believe that this effect would be very minimal (possibly non-existent/too small to be measured) unless combined with either a perfectly rigid putting robot or an incredibly rigid putting stroke that would adversely affect the distance control and feel of the golfer making the putting stroke.

 

Edited by Pretzel
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...
Posted

Not sure if I need to make a "introduction" post and I'm extremely sorry for necro'ing but I found this thread while doing a forum search for the stability shaft. I've read the whole thread. I recall seeing a few people ask for what is essentially scientific testing from unbiased 3rd party sources. I believe this has been done by MyG0lfSpy (not sure if I'll get banned for using their name... I know on other golf forums you can't even have the letters M-G and S in a row) somewhat recently.

IIRC, their data showed this shaft seemed to neither help nor hinder golfers, with maaaaybe a long term improvement on sg18 putting. Essentially, I read their test to say "if you're already a good putter, this will probably not help. If you're not a good putter AND you have $200 to burn, this *might* help you, over the course of many many rounds."

Again, apologies for the necro of this thread. Have any other users gotten their own data since the last post in 2018?


Posted (edited)
On 11/1/2018 at 11:58 AM, ChetlovesMer said:

Come on now! 
Next thing your are going to tell me is that the Hammer isn't really the world's longest driver. Or that isn't not really turning the golf world upside-down. 

Haw! My buddy was a sucker and bought one of those. After trying unsuccessfully to use it for half a season, he left it in the open bed of a pickup truck as we were leaving the course! 

And some outfit recently was advertising some new putter weighting or shafting idea, and for the life of me I can't remember who it was. It was supposed to "redistribute" the weight in the putter. I found a couple of them in a local golf shop and tried them. I didn't like them at all. Someone else mentioned re-bar. That's what these putters felt like, a length of re-bar in your hands! No feel at all! 

Edited by Buckeyebowman
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2388 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.