• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
iacas

Yardage Book

15 posts in this topic

I'd like to find a place that's willing to sell me some sort of blank yardage book. I don't want a little notepad that will fall apart in no time - I'd like something halfway decent. Empty, too - I want to write my own notes. I want to diagram the holes on the bottom, the green, on the top, and leave space for notes and whatnot around the edges. Ideally the pages will be interchangeable, as I may goof up a hole or two and want to start over.

I've never seen anything quite like this for sale, so I'm wondering if there is something, and if not, if there's a suitable substitute.

Anyone know?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I'd like to find a place that's willing to sell me some sort of blank yardage book. I don't want a little notepad that will fall apart in no time - I'd like something halfway decent. Empty, too - I want to write my own notes. I want to diagram the holes on the bottom, the green, on the top, and leave space for notes and whatnot around the edges. Ideally the pages will be interchangeable, as I may goof up a hole or two and want to start over.

If you're not too picky on how it looks on the outside, try getting one of those little planners that I see a lot of high schoolers use these days. The covering seems to be made of pretty strong stuff.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check Franklincovey.com

These people are the kings of making very nice organizers. They dropped the golf organizer couple years ago - but there binders are nice, pages are easily removed etc. . .

Problem is, they all have something on them. Perhaps they make a "blank page" package you could get for your binder. I don't know.

See what you think.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These people are the kings of making very nice organizers. They dropped the golf organizer couple years ago - but there binders are nice, pages are easily removed etc. . .

How exactly am I going to fit a binder in my back pocket?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

The Moleskine pocket reporter style notebooks fit in your back pocket. I would recommend either the one with plain paper or the one with graph paper squares. The latter might actually be better for sketching holes.

The reporter style is bound on top, like a stenographers pad. Moleskines are very cool; the black binding kind of looks like what the tour players pull out of their pockets when they are deciding what club to pull

I have one with lines that I intend to use for a similar purpose, but I've been procrastinating.

http://www.moleskines.com/moleskine-...notebooks.html



The pages aren't really removable, though. You would have to cut out pages you wanted to lose.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why not try making your own, using a note pad and import thr pictures of the course into your notepad, thats what i do when i got an play practise rounds, and make your own notes
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try golfwits.com they sale blank yardage books. I just made one for Murifield Village so I can take it along this week while watching the Memorial. (I have two badges for the week.)
You buy the books you want (they have thousands of courses to choose from) and I print them on card stock and make like a flip chart. They print out pocket size - four holes to a sheet of paper. When I'm done adding my note I laminate them. The one I printed for Murifield I printed on photo paper because I don't plan on writing on it.
I really like their books but it takes me forever to get all my notes on them.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just tried the link for golfwits and it didn't come up. They might be out of business.
here is the link if you want to try www.golfwits.com
it is golf wits with one t not two. goflwitts with two t's is a different site than the one I bought the books from.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Moleskine pocket reporter style notebooks fit in your back pocket. I would recommend either the one with plain paper or the one with graph paper squares. The latter might actually be better for sketching holes.

I bought one today for the sole purpose of taking notes while at The Memorial this week (and the secondary purpose of considering this idea), but they're awfully thick. It'd look like I had a brick in my back pocket. I don't think it'd work unless I took out many of the pages.

Here are two that you can use:

Which of those, specifically? I don't want to use stickers to make my course, and the rest of their products seem like covers

Thanks. I have a few of those coming. I have concerns about the quality and how well it will hold up, though. Perhaps I can get one of the covers from the TPK people?

why not try making your own, using a note pad and import thr pictures of the course into your notepad, thats what i do when i got an play practise rounds, and make your own notes

I may have to do just that in the end.

I just tried the link for golfwits and it didn't come up. They might be out of business.

They may be. I think they came up in a Google search earlier but, like you, I found their site DOA.

The search continues!!!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Which of those, specifically? I don't want to use stickers to make my course, and the rest of their products seem like covers

You don't HAVE to use the stickers...

The yardage books at the sites I linked (TPK, Yardage-Marker) will both work. Regardless of which yardage book you use, you'll probably want to use a cover for it just to keep it intact. I use them for practice rounds/tournaments that I play in and those are two of the better books I've come across. If you find any other good choices, let me know!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The golfwits link was working today...you just need to sign up and pay for the service. I liked the yardage marker book, this is somehting nice, but I play different courses all the time, execpt for my league (first year) and since it takes 3-4 hours to play nine holes, i may have time to make out a yardage book.

In making your book, I assume you are going to use a range finder?

Keep us updated on your progress and post some pics if you get a chance so we can see how it turns out.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The golfwits link was working today...you just need to sign up and pay for the service. I liked the yardage marker book, this is somehting nice, but I play different courses all the time, execpt for my league (first year) and since it takes 3-4 hours to play nine holes, i may have time to make out a yardage book.

How many golfers are in your league? 3-4 hours is ridiculous for 9 holes no matter how many players there are.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How many golfers are in your league? 3-4 hours is ridiculous for 9 holes no matter how many players there are.

I agree the time is somewhat absurd, but our league is not the problem. It is really the

leagues in front of us. Due to some scheduling snafus we were only able to get the 6:30 Tuesday slot at one of the local munis. Therefore, the course is already log-jammed by the time we tee off. Plus the group in front of us tend to migrate to each ball instead of walking to their own. In there defense though, they would have nowhere to go if they did play faster as they seem to be waiting for the group ahead as well. I just chalk it up to league play at a local muni being slow, really slow. But it is better than working or doing yard work, and gives me something to look forward to on Tuesdays. I see your in Michigan, whereabouts, where do you usually play?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

golfwits worked for me...I'll download my home course and see what I can put together. That yardage-marker.com site seemed to have a good product as well.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • GAME GOLF - Digital Tracking System
      Well, I went ahead and bit. Amazon Warehouse Deals has a few for $86 each. I had a $25 Amazon GC from Christmas, so after tax, it's going to be $66. It says the packaging is damaged, but no mention of problems with the device. Here's hoping it comes in good shape, and that it warms up pretty quickly so I can use it!
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (February 2016)
      The tournament I was supposed to play in was cancelled , so I played in a shotgun start today. The group I was in played at a quicker pace than the group in front and the group behind us, so I had plenty of opportunities for practicing greenside chipping and bunker shots as well as putting.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      While I expect it's largely accurate, I was more interested in a link to the actual quote than your paraphrase. The context of the question and interview plus the exact wording gives a clearer understanding of the statement. I accept deeper field of talent, I don't accept that it's automatically 'a ton' or an order of magnitude greater. What's the average score relative to the field (or % making the cut) in the PGA for the Pros vs. the PGA qualifiers from then to now? That could provide some insight to relative gap between majors field depth then and now. I am certain it's gotten harder for the PGA qualifiers to make it tot he weekend. I am less certain by how much the margin has shifted. The reason I stress the Majors and Opens is that size of field and openness to qualifiers is very important in making the top competitors face many elite players with potential to have a hot run of form. You're comparing apples to oranges there. That was ~ 1.5 million players in the U.S., not the world population of golfers. About 26 million golfers today in the U.S. Worldwide in 1920 who knows? But including Europe, Australia, and other 'commonwealth' countries it was likely double that - maybe triple. Also I can find no credible estimate that supports 100 million current golfers worldwide. Most generous is about 61 million. While there are a lot of clubs world-wide, participation of 'casual' unaffiliated golfers per club is not going to be the same as in the U.S. and that's the only way I get a number close to 100 million based on actual data. U.S. golf population talent base roughly tripled between Jack and Tiger and I expect worldwide it was a similar rate of increase. I think since the 1920's the U.S. has had about half the wold golf population, though that's started to decline of late as Asian participation increases. Jack was head and shoulders above highly competitive fields for nearly a generation similar to Tiger. I don't think human abilities change by orders of magnitude in short spans of time so I expect that Jack was an outlier of similar human ability as Tiger. How close and who has the edge is IMO debatable. Were Tiger's achievements (esp. the 'beat the field' streak) tougher than Jack's because of field depth, yes. How much more I'm not as sure as you. Did a relative 'competitive break' from full field events offered by the WGC's help Tiger there? Don't know but it's possible. Combine Tiger's regular wins and Majors and I have no problem giving him the greatest player of all time nod. I just don't think it's as cut and dried or by as large a margin as you seem to. They didn't play against each other so your confidence isn't any more a fact than my uncertainty. We're both estimating. Size of the field actually competing matters too, not just who wasn't invited to the party. I like the idea of a top player field and enjoy watching the events, but if only the top 50 players are playing they all have a better shot statistically than if the field was open to 156 or more players who are still very 'elite' in skill. As you've said in many posts, golf skill performance is highly variable. I agree and that's why I think size of field is relevant to the comparison, because I think the scoring variability of the top 90 golfers in the world overlaps considerably with the next 90 down and even a bit beyond that. That's why I wondered whether WGC wins are a bit less valuable than a major or a full field PGA tour event that's also open to Monday qualifying. Granted the world ranking system is better than it used to be, but it still weights international events more strongly than they deserve. Some of the reasons I think you may be undervaluing Nicklaus' achievement in comparing across eras.
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (January 2016)
      I managed to complete the January challenge (without missing a day, I believe). It was a great months' work for my game - having to blog every day sure helps to focus each session.
    • Steel vs Graphite generic question
      S300 is one of the lowest launching steel shafts.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries