• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
broombroom

Should you hit from a golf mat or tee up on grass when practicing?

6 posts in this topic

Hi I just got a driving net for practice in the home however the garden is getting wrecked so I can't really hit of the grass any more.  I was looking at driving range mats but I don't think they are the way to go and am considering just hitting of a tee.  What are your thoughts on this? I am using it with my camcorder  to constantly check my swing so I intend to put a tonne of hours into it this year.

Driving mat - can't afford a "good one".  A bad one could promote injury plus years a go when I went to the range I couldn't hit a ball worth of crap on the golf course.  Hence why I stopped going. Unrealistic.

Just a tee in the garden - Won't destroy the garden as much (could put a door mat underneath tee) but more realistic I guess than hitting of the mat?  Its cheap.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Both a tee and a mat can give you a false impression of how well you are striking the ball.

IMO it's not a huge deal but just a minor factor that some of us have to be aware of.

I hear people complain about injuries from striking a mat but I honestly can't relate to that. I could hit balls off of a concrete slab (and hit them fat) and it wouldn't bother me at all...No clue why.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could do what I do.  I usually practice with BirdieBalls at a local park.  But I don't want to be the guy wrecking the grass at the park (you're not supposed to golf there for that reason, and cause regular golf balls are considered dangerous of course).  But I'm not going to drag a huge heavy duty mat to the park either.

My fix was to just buy a big off-size discount roll of astroturf carpet at Home Depot.  I cut off two squares at a time and keep them in the car.  Just stack them and hit the birdie balls off of those.  Isn't 100% at protecting the grass, more like 90%, but it's pretty good.  Also, when I'm at a park with a baseball field, I've found I can actually just hit off those things on the dirt in the diamond itself.  So you've got options.

Main drawback is that the little squares fly off with every shot.  But I've actually found I like this, as it forces you to take a few steps and reset rather than just beating balls on auto pilot one after another.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

Just an FYI based on personal experience ...

I was a range rat for about 2 years before I started playing live golf - I'd go to the range a couple times per week, all year long / but where I am from (Northern NJ) - there are no grass practice facilities within 30-40 miles (that I knew of) so I would constantly be hitting off of mats ...

When it came time to actually play, I struggled greatly ... The mats definitely gave me a false sense of security and still do.

Try to hit off of grass as much as possible ...

Cheers!

Rob

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your input.  I have had a few ideas about making my own mat so I think I will give that a go.  For now however I am going to buy a synthetic grass cut out from a grass shop.  They have mats that are very similar to the first cut of rough at my course.  When hitting out of the first cut of rough, on my course anyway, the grass is quite dense and stiff.  Most of the time the ball just sits on top just like it does with this mat.  Crucially though when hitting out of this rough on the course you don't actually take a divot since the ball is on top, instead you take a few grass cuttings.  The rough mat from the grass shop also can do this so it is quite realistic except it will wear overtime.

As for a good realistic fairway mat its very difficult to achieve realism since you are actually taking earth with you, something a mat won't do (and may never do)so I am thinking of some kind of solution for that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both a tee and a mat can give you a false impression of how well you are striking the ball.

+1 for the mat. I find that hitting off a mat that's placed on a hard surface (ashphalt /cement etc.), gives me a false impression of my iron play. Not sure how a mat on a softer surface like grass will work out. Plus some mats leave a green film on some clubs.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • GAME GOLF - Digital Tracking System
      Well, I went ahead and bit. Amazon Warehouse Deals has a few for $86 each. I had a $25 Amazon GC from Christmas, so after tax, it's going to be $66. It says the packaging is damaged, but no mention of problems with the device. Here's hoping it comes in good shape, and that it warms up pretty quickly so I can use it!
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (February 2016)
      The tournament I was supposed to play in was cancelled , so I played in a shotgun start today. The group I was in played at a quicker pace than the group in front and the group behind us, so I had plenty of opportunities for practicing greenside chipping and bunker shots as well as putting.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      While I expect it's largely accurate, I was more interested in a link to the actual quote than your paraphrase. The context of the question and interview plus the exact wording gives a clearer understanding of the statement. I accept deeper field of talent, I don't accept that it's automatically 'a ton' or an order of magnitude greater. What's the average score relative to the field (or % making the cut) in the PGA for the Pros vs. the PGA qualifiers from then to now? That could provide some insight to relative gap between majors field depth then and now. I am certain it's gotten harder for the PGA qualifiers to make it tot he weekend. I am less certain by how much the margin has shifted. The reason I stress the Majors and Opens is that size of field and openness to qualifiers is very important in making the top competitors face many elite players with potential to have a hot run of form. You're comparing apples to oranges there. That was ~ 1.5 million players in the U.S., not the world population of golfers. About 26 million golfers today in the U.S. Worldwide in 1920 who knows? But including Europe, Australia, and other 'commonwealth' countries it was likely double that - maybe triple. Also I can find no credible estimate that supports 100 million current golfers worldwide. Most generous is about 61 million. While there are a lot of clubs world-wide, participation of 'casual' unaffiliated golfers per club is not going to be the same as in the U.S. and that's the only way I get a number close to 100 million based on actual data. U.S. golf population talent base roughly tripled between Jack and Tiger and I expect worldwide it was a similar rate of increase. I think since the 1920's the U.S. has had about half the wold golf population, though that's started to decline of late as Asian participation increases. Jack was head and shoulders above highly competitive fields for nearly a generation similar to Tiger. I don't think human abilities change by orders of magnitude in short spans of time so I expect that Jack was an outlier of similar human ability as Tiger. How close and who has the edge is IMO debatable. Were Tiger's achievements (esp. the 'beat the field' streak) tougher than Jack's because of field depth, yes. How much more I'm not as sure as you. Did a relative 'competitive break' from full field events offered by the WGC's help Tiger there? Don't know but it's possible. Combine Tiger's regular wins and Majors and I have no problem giving him the greatest player of all time nod. I just don't think it's as cut and dried or by as large a margin as you seem to. They didn't play against each other so your confidence isn't any more a fact than my uncertainty. We're both estimating. Size of the field actually competing matters too, not just who wasn't invited to the party. I like the idea of a top player field and enjoy watching the events, but if only the top 50 players are playing they all have a better shot statistically than if the field was open to 156 or more players who are still very 'elite' in skill. As you've said in many posts, golf skill performance is highly variable. I agree and that's why I think size of field is relevant to the comparison, because I think the scoring variability of the top 90 golfers in the world overlaps considerably with the next 90 down and even a bit beyond that. That's why I wondered whether WGC wins are a bit less valuable than a major or a full field PGA tour event that's also open to Monday qualifying. Granted the world ranking system is better than it used to be, but it still weights international events more strongly than they deserve. Some of the reasons I think you may be undervaluing Nicklaus' achievement in comparing across eras.
    • "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge (January 2016)
      I managed to complete the January challenge (without missing a day, I believe). It was a great months' work for my game - having to blog every day sure helps to focus each session.
    • Steel vs Graphite generic question
      S300 is one of the lowest launching steel shafts.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries