Jump to content
IGNORED

Wanna help another beginner chose his clubs?


Note: This thread is 4684 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

My wife and I are beginners, and are just as confused as everyone else. I have been to the driving range a few times and have played a couple of games of golf. When it comes to buying equipment for sports, I am extremely picky; and eventually want to buy a very nice set if I stick to the game (my favorite driver so far is Taylormade Burner- http://www.taylormadegolf.com/products/drivers/burner-superfast-2.0-driver).

For now, we were thing of buying a beginners set we wont mind discarding for cheap next year. I have narrowed down to two sets available at our local club (which will let me try these out for a couple of times with an option of returning): Price Triax XV (http://www.princegolf.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath;=10&products;_id=72) and Orlimar Black Ice (http://www.orlimar.com/blackice.html).

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think you should just go for the nicer set and get fitted for your shaft.

If you are beginners and you aren't swinging hard, perhaps get a regular shaft.

At least when you need to change, all you change is just the shafts and you still keep the club heads.

New clubs = getting used to it and your swing may detoriate for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thanks for the reply, Sai-Jin.

I went to a local store, and although they didn't officially fit me, they told me that I need regular length and regular stiffness based on my swing speed. Both of these sets have regular graphite shafts; and I really cant tell the difference (prince has more clubs and is $30 more). I am going for  swing analysis/ lesson this weekend. Should I wait until then to buy?

Which of the two I mentioned do you think is nicer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I use Taylormade Woods and Mizuno Muscle Back blades only.

They are some of the best in the market and lower handicappers like them I find.

But you should just go with the ones you like in terms of feel and visual. This will give you more confidence when you look at the club heads as well as how they feel

when on impact. Only you can decide that.

The fitting will be for your current swing to determine what shaft you need. Believe it or not... shaft is very important.

So get those lessons and swing analysis and try out different brand clubs and pick the club head you like and stick

the shaft recommended by the fitter.

As your swing gets better and more solid, then you can get fitted again for the shaft. But I would think maybe it'll be a long while

before you get a new shaft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Don't go with a cheap beginner's set-get a nice used set of irons off ebay or globalgolf for approximately the same amount of money.  Tons of great clubs that cost top dollar 2, 5, 10 or 15 years ago, and you'll have no problem finding a set with regular flex shafts.  Look for stuff along the lines of Titleist 775s, PING Eye2s, PING Zing2s, PING ISIs, TaylorMade R7s, TM 300s, WilsonStaff Ci7s, Wilson Staff Ci9s, W/S Di9s, Mizuno MX-25s, Mizuno MX-200s, Callaway X-18s, X-20s, X-22s, Cobra SZ and many others.  Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Getting fitted for a iron shaft for a beginner is un-necessary.

Originally Posted by Sai-Jin

I use Taylormade Woods and Mizuno Muscle Back blades only.

They are some of the best in the market and lower handicappers like them I find.

But you should just go with the ones you like in terms of feel and visual. This will give you more confidence when you look at the club heads as well as how they feel

when on impact. Only you can decide that.

The fitting will be for your current swing to determine what shaft you need. Believe it or not... shaft is very important.

So get those lessons and swing analysis and try out different brand clubs and pick the club head you like and stick

the shaft recommended by the fitter.

As your swing gets better and more solid, then you can get fitted again for the shaft. But I would think maybe it'll be a long while

before you get a new shaft.



Link to comment
Share on other sites


Aye Carramba! More confused now. But I get the point. Buy what feels good, and something my coach approves.

Finding used sets is harder than it sounds, tried Ebay- there's too many variables (shipping etc). Plus I find it hard to know if a brand from 2002 is as good as one today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Here's the short answer-yes.  A brand (I think you mean model) from 2002 is as good as one from today.  I don't know what people think is magically happening with irons over the last few years that is making them so much better.  The basics of a cavity back iron are the same today as when the PING Eye2 was invented.  Yes, there have been incremental changes/improvements over the years, but you'd be hard pressed to find a more forgiving and great all around iron than the PING Zing2 from 1994-1996.  Callaway Big Berthas and X-12s-X24s are essentially the same club now as when they came out.

I'm not sure I understand how there are too many variables on ebay.  Sort what you're looking for by cost plus shipping, look at items from a respected seller.  And if for some reason you're still not comfortable, check globalgolf.

Originally Posted by gurdesh

Aye Carramba! More confused now. But I get the point. Buy what feels good, and something my coach approves.

Finding used sets is harder than it sounds, tried Ebay- there's too many variables (shipping etc). Plus I find it hard to know if a brand from 2002 is as good as one today.



Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by max power

Here's the short answer-yes.  A brand (I think you mean model) from 2002 is as good as one from today.  I don't know what people think is magically happening with irons over the last few years that is making them so much better.  The basics of a cavity back iron are the same today as when the PING Eye2 was invented.  Yes, there have been incremental changes/improvements over the years, but you'd be hard pressed to find a more forgiving and great all around iron than the PING Zing2 from 1994-1996.  Callaway Big Berthas and X-12s-X24s are essentially the same club now as when they came out.

I'm not sure I understand how there are too many variables on ebay.  Sort what you're looking for by cost plus shipping, look at items from a respected seller.  And if for some reason you're still not comfortable, check globalgolf.



There are too many variable on ebay for a new golfer. Don't search by brand and model. Try searching for "golf clubs". It's truly overwhelming.

I wouldn't normally suggest getting a cheaper box set, but since most people quit golf after seeing how hard and expensive it is, why waste so much money and time searching. Just pick up a set of Prince or whatever set an experienced golfer might think is a POS and go for it.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I guess you're right-I'm just thinking of everyone I know who bought a similar set, got even remotely interested in golf, and then was looking to sell or trade for some "real clubs" 3-9 months later.  There's nothing "wrong" with a starter set-they're perfectly functional.  But if you like golf at all you'll be looking to move up soon and the starter set will be worth next to nothing.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

There are too many variable on ebay for a new golfer. Don't search by brand and model. Try searching for "golf clubs". It's truly overwhelming.

I wouldn't normally suggest getting a cheaper box set, but since most people quit golf after seeing how hard and expensive it is, why waste so much money and time searching. Just pick up a set of Prince or whatever set an experienced golfer might think is a POS and go for it.



Link to comment
Share on other sites


I just mean losing $2-300 on a set of crap-o-matics isn't any more of a waste than buying a 2-300 set of great irons that don't fit then he has to turn them around on ebay (not everyone likes to be a seller) or kijiji or whatever, because irons from ebay are sort of worthless too, at trade-in time.

And irons have changed in the past year and a half. There aren't quite as sets of Transformers by Nike for example. Cobra still has some goofball irons, but for the most part 2011 has much more classic irons than 2002 offered. BTW the first generation Big Berthas are virtually unplayable for someone who's ever swung a blade.

Originally Posted by max power

I guess you're right-I'm just thinking of everyone I know who bought a similar set, got even remotely interested in golf, and then was looking to sell or trade for some "real clubs" 3-9 months later.  There's nothing "wrong" with a starter set-they're perfectly functional.  But if you like golf at all you'll be looking to move up soon and the starter set will be worth next to nothing.



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I concede to a degree on the ebay point (if he's not comfortable with ebay then so be it), but disagree on the change in irons.  Yeah-Nike's recent offerings look different and whatnot, but irons are irons.  I prefer blades and play them about 70% of the time, but I wouldn't have any trouble hitting some old Big Berthas.  Late last year I was visiting my Dad and playing my MacGregor blades.  We tee off at the butt-crack of dawn at his course, so there's time to goof around or practice on the course.  I hit an approach shot with my 9 iron, then grabbed his PING G5 PW to hit the same shot.  Took the same swing, very similar result.  I will admit that G5s are easier/more forgiving than blades, but I get the best results with a big cavity back when I make the same swing as I do with a blade.  Sometimes I go to the range with some old blades, new blades, and a GI cavity back.  The better I hit old school blades the better I hit everything else.

Side note-if he's worried about losing money on used clubs then I 100% recommend some used PINGs.  Eye2s, Zings, ISIs, I3s, I5s, G5s-they've lost about as much value as they're going to lose, cosmetically they hold up extremely well, and it's not uncommon to make a few dollars when you decide to sell a set of older PINGs.

You'll also be happy to know that I finally convinced my 60 year old Dad that he didn't have to play big oversized cavity backs.  I gave him my Nike Pro Combo set for father's day, and he certainly wasn't going to pass on practicing/playing with a new set of irons.  After a short learning curve he hits them as well/better than any irons ever, and he shot a career and possibly best ever 5 under a couple weeks ago.

Originally Posted by sean_miller

I just mean losing $2-300 on a set of crap-o-matics isn't any more of a waste than buying a 2-300 set of great irons that don't fit then he has to turn them around on ebay (not everyone likes to be a seller) or kijiji or whatever, because irons from ebay are sort of worthless too, at trade-in time.

And irons have changed in the past year and a half. There aren't quite as sets of Transformers by Nike for example. Cobra still has some goofball irons, but for the most part 2011 has much more classic irons than 2002 offered. BTW the first generation Big Berthas are virtually unplayable for someone who's ever swung a blade.



Link to comment
Share on other sites


Buy a new beginer set because they are

  • Forgiving and made from multi material heads for larger sweet spots, off set and perimiter wieghted
  • Compelet even with a putter and bag
  • Cheep so you can try and hit out of a fairway bunker and not worry about scratching up your 5 iron

Dont buy a good set (even used) untill you have found your swing.

Even if you buy another set in 6 months you'll end up paying more for one or two clubs than whole beginer set.

Once you retire the beginer set keep it as It's always good to have a spare set for a guest or friends.

I just put my Adams Tieght Lies away this year after banging um arround for 2 years and got Mizuno JPX pro irons and titleist woods/hybrid.

I do not regreat one penny I spent on the Adams beginer set and I am very happy I waited to get a good set as I know what my game needs are now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4684 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 135: 5/10/24 Putting and chipping practice. Good session putting through 50 mm gates.
    • Why should SuperSpeed get 3x of Stack's profits? I get the part about SuperSpeed wanting damages sustained as a result of Stack, but I don't get why SuperSpeed feels that they're entitled to both Stack's profits and damages.   Does anyone know/think SuperSpeed actually has a case here?
    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...